ipl-logo

Powerful Federal Government

705 Words3 Pages

In the beginning many argued how powerful should our federal government be. Many questions were raised on what instances did the federal government had the standing and precedence to act. Notable figures who disagreed were Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. The power of the nation expanded greatly between the years of 1789 and 1820. Economical policies by the treasury, decisions by the Supreme Court and the Acquisition of more territories resulted in more powerful federal government. Alexander Hamilton was the Secretary of the Treasury while George Washington was President and he was one of the main proponent to having a stronger federal government. One of policy that made the government stronger was when he allowed for it to pick …show more content…

The first of many was Marbury v. Madison. The Court formed the basis and established the exercise and practice of judicial review in the United States under the Constitution. The decision defined the boundary between the branches of the American form of government so it could provide the proper checks and balances. Many Anti-federalists disagreed stating that this decision would give the federal courts too much power and authority. They pointed that nothing in the Constitution established the power of judicial review. McCulloch v. Maryland was a case that decided if states had the power to tax national banks within their jurisdiction. The federal government had not asked for permission to open the bank in the state, and it was competing with banks established by the state. The state legislature then passed a law taxing all banks in Maryland that were not chartered by the state. The Court ruled that the United States government did have the right to establish a bank in Maryland and that the state of Maryland could not tax the bank for doing so. Cohens v. Virginia questioned if the Federal supreme court had to the right to review cases in the State Supreme Court. The court ruled that it had the authority decide all cases of every description under the laws of the United States.This case strengthened the federal Court 's jurisdiction. Another example of a court case that expand

Show More
Related

  • Case Study: Mcculloch Vs. Maryland

    643 Words  | 3 Pages

    McCulloch vs Maryland Summary In case of McCulloch vs Maryland is a landmark case that questioned the extent of federal government 's separation of power from state government. A problem arose when the Second Bank of America was established. With the War of 1812 and it’s financial suffering in the past, the government sought to create a bank with the purpose of securing the ability to fund future wars and financial endeavors. Many states were disappointed with this new organization, one of them being Maryland.

    Read More

  • Why Is Mcculloch Vs Maryland Important

    839 Words  | 4 Pages

    The McCulloch v. Maryland all was a supreme court case originally questioned does Congress have the power under the constitution to incorporate a bank even though it isn't clearly said in constitution? The other argument was does the state of Maryland have the power to tax an institution created by congress? The reason for Maryland trying to sue McCulloch was because they wanted money and he wasn't following state law

    Read More

  • Why Is Mcculloch Vs Maryland Important

    823 Words  | 4 Pages

    McCulloch v Maryland Facts of the Case In 1819 the United States had a federal bank, the Bank of the United States. The state of Maryland taxed every person that did business with banks out of the state. Also they decided to tax the federal bank to impede their operation. They prohibited the issuing of all bank notes except the ones issued by the state. There were fees and penalties established if this regulation was violated.

    Read More

  • Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Analysis

    729 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ogden, which was about New York requiring out-of-state boats to pay fees to go through there waters. A man named Thomas Gibbons who owned a steam boat that went through New Jersey and New York waters everyday challenged the States monopoly. The case eventually went to the Supreme Court where Chief Justice John Marshall said that those state laws weren't valid since it didn't work with the congressional act. The state of New York had created a law that allowed them to earn money, but the government didn't like the idea that the state was regulating its waters so they voided the law. In the case McCulloch v. Maryland, the state of Maryland placed a tax on the Second Bank of the United States.

    Read More

  • XYZ Affair: Events Surrounding The French Revolution

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    59. Marbury v. Madison is the most important case in Supreme Court history, was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to apply the principle of "judicial review" the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution. The facts surrounding Marbury were complicated. In the election of 1800, the newly organized Democratic - Republican Party of Thomas Jefferson defeated the Federalist party of John Adams, creating an atmosphere of political panic for the lame duck Federalists. 60.

    Read More

  • Marbury Vs. Madison: Supreme Court Case

    391 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison, the court used its jurisdiction authority to hear and decide the issues put forth in Marbury v. Madison. This Supreme Court case argued for William Marbury’s commission, although it was denied by Thomas Jefferson’s secretary, James Madison. This case further helped to establish judicial review, the power of the courts to review acts of other branches of government and the states. In the case of Marbury v. Madison, the court used appellate jurisdiction and eventually appellate court to review and revise the law made by a lower court.

    Read More

  • Court System: The Marbury Vs. Madison Case

    610 Words  | 3 Pages

    The judicial review process is an important aspect of the US Court system. The process involves the use of powers by the Federal Courts to void the congress' acts that direct conflict with the Constitution. The Marbury v. Madison is arguably the landmark case that relates to Judicial Review. The Marbury v. Madison case was written in the year 1803 by the Chief Justice at that time named John Marshall. Thomas Jefferson won an election on the Democratic - Republican Party that had just been formed creating a panicky political atmosphere having defeated John Adams of the previous ruling party.

    Read More

  • What Are The Implications Of The Marbury Vs Madison Case Brief

    582 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Marshall wrote, “the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void” (Findlaw.com, 2015). This was the first time the court nullified an act of Congress. Ultimately, the ruling by the Supreme Court brought into question the power of judicial review and their future involvement in regards to federal

    Read More

  • John Marshall's Supreme Court Cases

    252 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Marshall’s Supreme Court hearings had a positive effect on the United States. From court cases like McCulloch v. Maryland, declared that the federal courts could decide if state laws were unconstitutional. The McCulloch v. Maryland trial went to the supreme court because Maryland had put a tax in place that too 2% of all assets of the bank or a flat rate of $30,000. John Marshall saw this tax as unconstitutional for the simple fact that people were being denied their property under the state legislature. From the Gibbons v. Ogden case, congress’s power over interstate commerce was strengthened.

    Read More

  • How Did John Marshall Impact On American History

    646 Words  | 3 Pages

    In both the McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden cases, John Marshall asserted the power of judicial review, and legitimatized the Supreme Court within the national government. The Marshall Court, over the span of thirty years, managed to influence the life of every American by aiding in the development of the judicial branch and establishing a boundary between the state and national government. John Marshall’s Supreme Court cases shaped how the government is organized today. He strongly believed in Federalism, and that the national government should be sovereign, rather than the states. The Supreme Court under John

    Read More

  • Federalists Vs Anti-Federalists

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branch were created and they all have equal powers. Federalist No. 51 states, “It is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others … But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others.” The Anti-Federalists believed the executive branch had too much power and that it became a monarch government. Richard Henry Lee's Objections to the Constitution states, “In the new Constitution, the President and Senate have all the executive, and two thirds of the legislative power.

    Read More

  • Marbury Vs Madison Case Summary

    556 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Marbury v. Madison (1803) it was announced by the Supreme Court for the very first time, that if an act was deemed inconsistent with the constitution then the court was allowed to declare the act void. Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, James Madison, denied William Marbury of his commission. President John Adams appointed William Marbury the justice of peace for the District of Columbia during his last day in office. Madison denied Marbury of this commission because he believed that because it was not issued before the termination of Adams presidency, that it was invalid. Marbury himself started a petition, along with three others who were in a similar situation.

    Read More

  • Colonial America Pros And Cons

    1120 Words  | 5 Pages

    McCulloch v. Maryland, Cohen v. Virginia, and Gibbons v. Ogden all served great significance to judicial nationalism due to their American legal system impact. The court case of McCulloch v. Maryland was caused due to the dispute between Maryland and the federal government regarding the constitutionality of a tax on the Bank of the United States (Nationalism and Sectionalism 1808-1826 lecture). It was determined that the creation of a national bank was an implied power, through the Necessary and Proper Clause. With this expression of power, the state of Maryland was unable to interfere, resulting in the affirmed supremacy of federal laws over state powers (Nationalism and Sectionalism 1808-1826 lecture). The McCulloch v. Maryland court case allowed for the priniciple of implied powers to settle in, extending the meaning of federal authority within the United States.

    Read More

  • Power Of The Federal Government In The 19th Century

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court case McCulloch v Maryland originally originated in Maryland when the Maryland legislature decided to levy a tax on all branches of the banks. It was aimed to destroy the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States. James McCulloch was a cashier at the Baltimore branch. He was issuing bank notes without complying with the Maryland law. Maryland had sued McCulloch for refusing to pay the taxes under the Maryland statute.

    Read More

  • Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    Madison court case that took place in 1803. The law that was declared by the Supreme Court at this hearing was that a court has the power to declare an act of Congress void if it goes against the Constitution. This case took place because President John Adams had appointed William Marbury as justice of the peace in the District of Columbia, and the new president, Thomas Jefferson, did not agree with this decision. William Marbury was not appointed by the normal regulation, which was that the Secretary of State, James Madison, needed to make a notice of the appointment. James Madison did not follow through and make a notice of Marbury’s appointment; therefore, he sued James Madison, which was where the Supreme Court came in place.

    Read More

More about Powerful Federal Government

Open Document