Fair Cost Vs Historical Cost Accounting

1050 Words5 Pages

Fair cost is the cost that is estimated or can be determined by the market while historical cost is related to the cost that is fixed i.e. purchasing cost. Fair cost is the cost on which the assets can be sold or exchanged among the different parties and the liabilities can also be settled with the other parties while the historical cost of an asset is that cost on which that particular asset was purchased. The fair value of an asset can be determined from the current situation of the market because it is the market value of the asset while the historical cost is always fixed; it can’t be changed with the passage of time because the cost during the purchase remains the same. The fair value is determined by using some models rather …show more content…

In the process they have set up what the 'pros' of this model are. The following list of preferences, which in no way, shape or form is thorough, is gotten from crafted by Littleton, Mautz and Ijiri.
Historical cost accounting, an account of the genuine exchanges is kept and in this manner speaks to a supporting record of the figures on the money related explanations. Chronicled cost gives the proof to deciding how successfully administration has met its duties. Records of the past exchanges are fundamental for responsibility. Ijiri (1975) claims that as long as responsibility is important, historical cost must be used.
Historically based financial statements have been observed to be valuable. Mautz (1973) attests that financial reports in light of historical cost have stood the trial of time. On the off chance that those depended with settling on administration and venture choices had not observed such reports to be helpful, they would have unquestionably called for bookkeeping to actualize changes in like …show more content…

Because, it is timely relevant. Since reasonable esteem bookkeeping uses data particularly for the time and current economic situations, it endeavors to give the most applicable assessments conceivable. It has an extraordinary enlightening an incentive for a firm itself and energizes provoke remedial activities. Also, More data in the financial statements than historical cost. Reasonable esteem accounting upgrades the instructive energy of a budgetary proclamation rather than the other bookkeeping technique - the authentic cost. Reasonable esteem bookkeeping requires a firm to unveil broad data about the strategy utilized, the supposition made, hazard introduction, related sensitivities and different issues that outcome in a careful money related articulation. Moreover, Dependable Information, For a money related information to be solid, they should be undeniable and impartial. Since reasonable esteem is induced from the market cost of a given resource, this esteem can be checked looking back from accessible data about the present and past market costs. Since it is important to incorporate the system and reveal the data about conceivable deviations from a cited cost in the money related articulation, this data can likewise be

Show More

More about Fair Cost Vs Historical Cost Accounting

Open Document