Pros And Cons Of Felon Disenfranchisement
Felon Disenfranchisement: Is it Constitutional and Should Felons Be Allowed to Vote? Felon disenfranchisement is defined as, “Any convicted felon currently incarcerated or ex-felon now on parole or probation who cannot vote.”(Brooks, 2005). There are nearly 5.3 million Americans who have been barred from voting due to criminal conviction (Okechukwu, 2022). This is important to consider because the United States is unlike any other democratic country in the world by doing this. Yes, other countries express felon disenfranchisement in their own ways, but “no other democratic country in the world denies as many people- in absolute or proportional terms- the right to vote because of felony conviction.” (Okechukwu, 2022). These laws that permit …show more content…
and taken away their ability to vote. I believe this disproportionately affects certain minority groups and robs the U.S. polls from the true opinion of the American people. When felons lose the right to vote they lose their voice. They lose the ability to speak for their experience and for the felon’s lifestyle in America. During the civil war era, southerners would make many efforts to prevent black citizens from gaining the right to vote and the primal way they could do this was by creating laws to punish felons and those with criminal history. They did this to limit the voices of minorities in politics and the policies passed that would benefit the minority groups in the U.S. These felon disenfranchisement laws were the only restrictions remaining after Jim Crow laws were rid of. On the opposing side, people value morality and claim the purity of the ballot box would be decreased by enfranchising felons. They fear that permitting felons to vote would promote hazardous laws and people to be elected into office because of the judgement felons are stereotyped to have. To avoid corruption the U.S. keeps these disenfranchisement laws in place to avoid corruption and ensure our nation is led by trusted officials not influenced by the opinions of those incarcerated. Research Questions 1. Why do felons get the right to vote taken away? 2. Does disenfranchisement disproportionately affect people of color?
Brief Summary Of Chapter Four By Alexander
1042 Words | 5 PagesAccording to Alexander, the punishment that a convict suffers within prison is nothing compared to the punishments that await the convict on the outside. The first obstacle that convicts face directly following their release is whether or not they will find a place to sleep. Once labeled a felon, an ex-convict faces various forms of discrimination in housing, employment, and other necessary resources. Under Jim Crow, housing discrimination was legal on the basis of race while under mass incarceration, housing discrimination is legal against labeled felons on the basis of their prior criminal convictions (Alexander, pg 142-145). In his “get tough on crime” policies, President Clinton passed the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act, which permitted public housing agencies to evict drug offenders, convicts, as well as deny housing to any person that was believed to be involved with illegal drugs.
Causes Of Felon Disenfranchisement
142 Words | 1 PagesFelon Disenfranchisement has emerged as popular and topic in recent political agendas. Felon Disenfranchisement is defined as, “The removing of a felon’s civil liberties while incarcerated and/or past their prison sentence” (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2016). Generally, disenfranchisement is seen as a retributive form of punishment. Arguably, the rights that are removed from felons during disenfranchisement are seen as essential to the American Identity. Supporters argue that people that break the law should not partake in the process of it and argue that the potential loss of these basic American civil liberties can provide deterrence.
Should Felons Have The Right To Vote Essay
888 Words | 4 PagesSo the ones, who think felon’s or ex-felons should not vote, hold a grudge and begin to despise the idea of allowing a felon to vote. People want to continue with felon disenfranchisement and exclude felons from their own country. Although felons seem to have no morals. In all honesty, they do and they should be allowed at least one right that all Americans are able to share with one another.
Should Felons Be Able To Vote Essay
697 Words | 3 PagesIt is clear to see that if incarcerated individuals could vote while in prison many negative factors they face would be prevented. However, Politician’s wouldn’t want this to happen because they know that this would go against or hurt their campaign for many reasons, one being they wouldn’t be able to successfully persuade both incarcerated individuals and those of us in society due to one party (incarcerated individuals or citizens) being able to benefit from the promises of the candidate and one not. This wouldn’t be beneficial to those who oversee private prisons either because they would be prosecuted if the truths came to light about the mistreatment and injustice of those who are in jail face in their day to day lives. These wrongdoings could be changed in many ways but if I had to step up and do it personally I would demonstrate through signing a petition or marching for change. Signing a petition that would speak out and highlight things that need to change to ensure a safe life for their inmates would ultimately cause the overseers to consider my proposition to prevent a scandal.
Should Felons Be Allowed To Vote Essay
618 Words | 3 PagesA recently released felon making the right moves then we are denying them the very basic human right to vote. In 2010, out of the voting population, 2.5% were denied the right to vote because of a previous felony conviction. In recent years, 28 states have passed laws that allow convicted felons to vote but only once they have completed their sentence and anything that was given to do upon being released from prison. Once released, this means that they have worked off the punishment that
Prisoner Voting
1489 Words | 6 PagesA goal of elections is for communities working together to achieve a common good that creates social ties and some sort of social stability. Granting prisoners, currently or previously sentenced the right to vote gives them the psychological and sociological rehabilitation in order for them to express their political right. Although prisoners are social outcasts they are familiarized with political standpoints and are well informed citizens given their free time to watch television or read the newspaper, allowing prisoners to vote helps them reintegrate into society no matter how long their sentence may be. However, felony disenfranchisement increases “the social distance between the offender and the community, and reaffirms his/her feelings of alienation and isolation. This may impede his/her acceptance and respect of the social norms and rule of law” (Dhami, 2009, p. 10).
Costs And Benefits Of Felons Restrictions
97 Words | 1 PagesThis is certainly a conflicting issue. While it is fair to value the welfare of law abiding citizens over the welfare of convicted felons, placing restricting on felons presents the issue of those felons lacking the ability to become a contributing member of society. Like you mentioned, that can provide the push needed for them to return to crime rather than working towards a steady life of their own. Further research into the costs and benefits of such restrictions is necessary to determine whether these types of restrictions actually do benefit society overall like they intend to.
Argumentative Essay On Felons
912 Words | 4 PagesSomeone who has been convicted of a felony can have just as much passion or even care more about their civil rights than another citizen. Depending on which state they committed the crime, felons could lose their right to vote which could take that opportunity away from someone who really cares about the political and economic state of our
Ex Felons Should Have The Right To Vote Again Essay
530 Words | 3 PagesHowever , there are many controversies going on whether the former criminals to should have the right to vote again. Should they get the right to vote again? No, they should not because ex-cons have shown irresponsibility and dishonesty, they have violated the the rights of others, and they do not value society. According to, Voting Rights: 6 reasons Ex felons should not vote by Jerry Shaw, “Ex prisoners prisoners have demonstrated dishonesty and irresponsibility in their character by committing a crime, especially a serious crime and
Why Do Felons Deserve To Vote
924 Words | 4 PagesFormer Felons Deserve to Vote Felons can permanently lose their right to vote in ten different states and have their voting rights restricted in thirty-eight of them, this means that in forty-eight states there are people who are not able to express their opinion, they have had their voice taken from them. Many people who were once convicted of a felony want to change their life around, they want to be a normal civilian to the United States, not someone seen as a juvenile or a law breaker. Being able to vote is a right and part of being a U.S. citizen, these people have had part of their citizenship taken from them, some won’t ever have that piece of citizenship for the rest of their life because of human disenfranchisement, a law passed in 1789. This law stated that all felons, blacks, and women were not allowed to vote. Since the passing of this law blacks and women were given their rights to vote however felons never were.
Felons Should Be Allowed To Vote Analysis
390 Words | 2 PagesIn the article “Why Released Felons Should Be Allowed to Vote”, author Steve Chapman addresses the concerns of societal members who are worrisome about a released felon’s right to vote. The basis of the article is focused on whether or not those who were once accused of a felony, should be granted voting rights after being released into society after imprisonment or the proportionate punishment has been served. The author’s thesis is that previously convicted felons who have been reformed through rehabilitation or incarceration should receive voting rights after being released into society, and should not be subject to the inquiry of society based on their prior actions. The main argument made by Chapman is those who are against voting
Summary Of Bryan Stevenson's Just Mercy
961 Words | 4 PagesInstead of facing a punishment, these criminals are treated just like law-abiding citizens. In addition, the authors explain that disenfranchisement rulings “[serve] the same purpose as the other forms of punishment for felonies: to discourage people from committing serious crimes by making them forfeit not only a year or more of their lives in prison, but by excluding them from the body of citizens who make the rules they agree to abide by.” The article explains that people who have committed felonies must be disciplined in order to learn a lesson. Many states that fail to punish released felons have people who may repeat their illegal activities. They may try to test the government and bend the rules.
Should Felons Be Allowed To Vote Essay
479 Words | 2 PagesThe judgment of those who have committed serious crimes is not only arguable but untrustworthy. The right to vote should not return to felons upon completing their sentence because, there is no way of knowing if the individual has since improved their character. Ex cons should have to go a certain amount time without committing any sort of crime before voting rights are restored. While some may feel not permitting felons to vote goes against the eighth amendment, not allowing them to vote is in the people’s best
Compare And Contrast Constitution And Texas Constitution
670 Words | 3 PagesThe removal of this right dehumanizes prisoners. The streets of Texas are filled with blue or white collar criminals on bail or simply waiting for their sentence. Presently, if individual are found guilty of a crime, but they are not given a judicial sentence they are still allowed to vote; why should there be treated differently from convicted criminals who are locked up? However, allowing prisoners to vote while in prison would increase voting turnout and also Texas would gain the reputation of becoming one of the two states that allow prisoners to vote while in prison.
The Pros And Cons Of Disenfranchisement
1068 Words | 5 PagesThese efforts to block ex-felons to vote are unfair, undemocratic, and politically or racially motivated. Others who disagree may say they have shown poor judgement and should not be trusted with a vote. This is false because no one is perfect and everyone
More about Pros And Cons Of Felon Disenfranchisement
Brief Summary Of Chapter Four By Alexander
1042 Words | 5 PagesCauses Of Felon Disenfranchisement
142 Words | 1 PagesShould Felons Have The Right To Vote Essay
888 Words | 4 PagesShould Felons Be Able To Vote Essay
697 Words | 3 PagesShould Felons Be Allowed To Vote Essay
618 Words | 3 PagesPrisoner Voting
1489 Words | 6 PagesCosts And Benefits Of Felons Restrictions
97 Words | 1 PagesArgumentative Essay On Felons
912 Words | 4 PagesEx Felons Should Have The Right To Vote Again Essay
530 Words | 3 PagesWhy Do Felons Deserve To Vote
924 Words | 4 PagesFelons Should Be Allowed To Vote Analysis
390 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Bryan Stevenson's Just Mercy
961 Words | 4 PagesShould Felons Be Allowed To Vote Essay
479 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast Constitution And Texas Constitution
670 Words | 3 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Disenfranchisement
1068 Words | 5 Pages