With the women’s rights movement and the end of the draft the pentagon was compelled to review the status of women in the military. (Moore) The Army committee had recommendations to separate the women’s corps to increase the specialties offered to women. The Army committee also pushed opening ROTC and military academies to women and also changed the law that required automatic discharge if a woman became pregnant. It was after these recommendations were followed that women could serve in 430 of the 467 military specialties, but they could not command any unit that had a combat mission.
The Women’s Armed Services Integration Act was a law passed by President Harry S. Truman, allowing women to join the army. Before the act was passed, only men were permitted to be in combat, while women in the army worked in clinical positions. When World War II began, despite women not being allowed to join the “regular” army, the Women’s Army Corps was created and granted full army status during wartime. The growth in the number of women in the corps, along with the fact that they performed equally to the army, were two of the main factors for the law to be created and passed. The WAC was set to be expired in 1948, but the act was passed in the same years which meant that women would continue to be allowed to fight in the army.
So the frequently understood notion regarding the similarities and differences amongst the Civil War and World War 1 was that the civil war was an undeclared war fought merely against ourselves while Word War 1 was a certified war battled with a foreign country that came to American shores. One specific concern that was continually fanning the blazing issues with the Civil War of slavery produced a profound divergence among the North and South in the mid-1800s. From that distribution, the next surge of municipal liberties for minorities expanded. Changes between the two wars were the fact that the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendment shined a light on the fault lines of class and race. Racial animosity, injustices of the draft, and unrest during the civil war brings a head to our American nature.
In 1917, the first World War was officially underway. Orderly, the United States of America joined its indelible battles with a hope of peace throughout the countries. This war undeniably had a great impact on the U.S. ,but at first, there were little to no citizens who proudly volunteered to fight. As a result, the Selective Service Act had to be put into place. I believe that this was indeed necessary in order to gain enough troops to attack.
(Document 1) Before this new national policy was established, a men’s traditional role was to work and financially provide for their family. They have gained a new responsibility and must contribute to this war for their nation. As almost all men now partake in the military, there is an empty role in a family that needs to be filled. Women are now left to fill in the place of men to work and provide for their family. The government is encouraging all women to take this new opportunity in the workforce and states that the more women who work, the war will end quicker.
The government passed a law stating if men went to college, they couldn’t be drafted for war. This was unfair because a lot of families couldn’t afford to send their children to school so they didn’t have a choice whether to go to war or not. Many men tried escaping to Canada and other countries just to avoid the draft. A person should be made to go fight. It should be their choice.
I feel that the military draft should be mandatory for individuals to perform at least a year for public service because I think it will benefit the communities by helping and to volunteer to make the communities a better place to be. The consequences that the military draft to be mandatory for individuals to do public service is that in the future, the citizens of the communities would eventually make protests and claim that they should not be obligated of what they should do. I think that both men and women should be mandated to military service so that it would be equally fair for both genders. I think the program would not fit within the American notions of liberty for the reason that it has to do with someone 's way of life, behavior, and
A New York Times article provides evidence for a situation when that occurred, General Hershey the draft's veteran director once said, "Members and personnel of the board appreciate the concern of parents when their sons are being called into service... most of them know from personal experience the trials of such times” (Fred
Vietnam has certainly remained as one of the most concerning and controversial wars of all time. One of the most disputed aspects of the war was the draft. As a result of the draft, many young men would never return home. From draft card burnings, to anti-war protests, it is evident that the draft and it’s process was seen as unfavorable in the eyes of many people in America.
In the feature article “All Guts, No Glory”, I agree with the author Molly M. Ginty, that women participating in combat. If I was in the military some of the things that might affect me would be probably because of my gender. First, women would not be put into battle because people think women cannot handle the work or bloodshed. They think women are better off bring a nurse for helping men in battle if they get injured. Second, they think women in combat would be a distraction.
The purpose of the draft is to recruit physically capable citizens to the armed forces if they are required. The draft should recruit from all of the physically capable, no matter their gender. It is frequently argued there are less physically capable than there are men, and while that is true, it should not stop the millions of women who are physically capable. As of 2011, about 203,000 women serve in the active-duty military, including sixtynine serving as generals and admirals. Though this impressive number is only about fifteen percent of the total active-duty force, the amount of women serving continues to rise.
Should women be allowed in combat? Women should be able to serve in combat if men can. I will prove that women are equal to men and they have the strength just like men. People say one of the main reasons they don’t want women in combat, is Physicality. Physicality is a main component in combat, you have to have it to be in it.
It would be horrible for a husband to be yanked from his wife and kids, then to find out he died fighting in a war he didn’t even sign up for. If a man has children, or his wife is expecting, he should be exempted. Some would argue that the mandatory draft was necessary, that “the U.S. military must remain prepared to fight a really big war that might require a much larger force” (Barno/Bensahel). To protect against that, there would be safeguards put into the mandatory draft. If the amount of soldiers in the military by volunteer dropped to a point that was too low to fight, the protections such as college and family, would be stripped, and the age range upped from 18-25 to 18-30.
In the book written by (Gavin, 1997) it was cited that “As women took over from their absent men in hundreds of new and challenging occupations, many of which had previously been considered inappropriate”. From the beginning of the World War 1, the German women were participating a great deal. They contributed to half a million-people working on the munitions manufacturing alone (Gavin, 1997). It also mentioned in the book that over in the U.S, the men in charge refused to let the women participate up until April 1917 (Gavin, 1997). The U.S government never formally authorize the enrolment of women, despite Army officials repeatedly asking for such personnel’s.
The gender role in military as women categorized and stereotyped by men has never been easy. Military does not require muscular or gender power for leadership in combat or command positions. Some men believe that women in command will weaken the military tradition or military in context. The gender role of “women” and “soldiers” proved to many that is uncontested in World War I and II when women served as auxiliaries. Women have a long history of service in the military.
