Today in class, we discussed about Albert Camus’ quote and briefly gave a description about the writer. Before we discussed about his quote, we would have to describe who he was and why he wrote his quote. We said that he was known as a stupid famous French writer who also wrote his own famous novel called, “The Stranger.” Professor Mansfield mentions that he was also a philosopher who did not believe in God, considering him as an Atheist. After we described who the writer was, Mansfield had told us to read and discuss the quote that Albert wrote with a partner and see what we have came up with. My partner was named “Rabin” and we were explaining to each other what the quote is really saying and how it relates to our perspective of life. …show more content…
Rabin and I defined that an unfree world means the rules of the government. Rabin explains to me that the quote is saying, “if you become free for yourself, you start to rebel against it,” then I explained to him that it says, “when you follow rules, you are most likely not to be free.” Then, we both described rules as an act of oppression and that rules can really oppress you in your very existence. I also told him that it says, “It’s all about following your own rules as an act of rebelling the unfree world.” Therefore, Professor Mansfield explains the meaning of the quote that, “the free of your existence is an act of doing what you’re supposed to …show more content…
Julio explains that “we are embarrassed by love because of our insecurity, emotions, pressure, and how we are naturally born with being embarrassed by it.” Then, Harlene explains that “Less women are afraid to show their love and more men fear the rejection.” Julio and Rick describes the story about the Santa Barbara man being rejected by a girl as an example of the fear of rejection of men. Professor Mansfield asks Antwaun about his thoughts of embarrassment for love; although, he needed help to answer Mansfield’s question, Rick decided to help him respond to the question. Rick explains to Antwaun that “love isn’t just for you, but also for your family.” Professor Mansfield tells us that “romantic love isn’t just the only type of love there is,” then he starts to ask the class, “what kinds of love is out there.” As we speak, me, Julio, Harlene, and Rick mention: Brotherly Love, Parental Love, Self-Love, and Companionship. Finally, we read a 10 page article written by Bell Hooks called, “Love As The Practice of Freedom.” To begin with, we start to look for the page where the working definition of love Bell Hooks mentions in the article. Fernando finds the page
What is love? There are many ways American Literature has portrayed the idea of love, and how it works. Several pieces of American Literature demonstrate the theme of love; this is shown in Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, “Annabelle Lee”, by Edgar Allan Poe, and Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. In Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag and Mildred Montag, a married couple, represent what love is not about.
¨Freedom means you are unobstructed in living your life as you choose. Anything less is a form of slavery.¨ This is similar to Frederick Douglass because he lived his most of his life in slavery and then after slavery ended he chose to live his life the way he wanted. Frederick Douglass was an African American slave who wanted to abolish slavery after hearing the word abolish so many times. Douglass´s audience were many other African Americans who also said slavery was a bad thing. How slavery was bad for slaves and how it corrupts slave owners.
The Cost of being Free “Man is born free, but he is everywhere in chains.” A man is free to do everything as per his will, but then there are some cultural norms, social restrictions, and the destinies which have already been decided. All of these matters frankly chain the man and make him handicapped. The realities of the life confine him, and all his free will goes in vain.
Lord of the Flies Essay Freedoms are well earned rights that most people have in today’s world. These freedoms allow people to do what they want, to an extent, without the government stopping them. Freedoms like these are great to have, but often they are abused. Societies take advantage of their rights, which can lead to consequences.
How to Live According to Irving Singer Throughout Irving Singer acclaimed trilogy, The Nature of Love, the viewer can observe how he unveils rich insight into fundamental aspects of human relationships through literature, the complexities of our being, and the history of ideas. In his sequel, The Pursuit of Love, Singer approaches love from a distinct standpoint; he reveals his collection of extended essays where he presents psychological and philosophical theories of his own. The audience can examine how he displays love as he systematically maps the facets of religion, sexual desire, love from a parent, family member, child or friend. Irving explores the distinction between wanting to be loved and wanting to love another, which ultimately originates from the moment an individual is born.
A question that most Americans ask is “Are we really free?’ and people respond with multiple different answers such as yes, no, and “we used to be”. This answer always varies on the type of person you ask because everyone has they different meaning of the word “Free”. Freedom means “not under the control or in the power of another”. Freedom was a gift given to America from the forefathers’ victory against the British.
We live in a society that has increasingly demoralizes love, depicting it as cruel, superficial and full of complications. Nowadays it is easy for people to claim that they are in love, even when their actions say otherwise, and it is just as easy to claim that they are not when they indeed are. Real love is difficult to find and keeping it alive is even harder, especially when one must overcome their own anxieties and uncertainties to embrace its presence. This is the main theme depicted in Russell Banks’ short story “Sarah Cole: A Type of Love Story,” as well as in Richard Bausch’s “The Fireman’s Wife.” These narratives, although similar in some ways, are completely different types of love stories.
Jesus Muneton Mr. Ramirez English 3-AP 21 August 2015 Their Eyes Were Watching God Response A picture may be considered to be worth a thousand words, but an experience that one lives cannot be valued in words or in any other currency for that matter. Janie Crawford, the main character in Their Eyes Were Watching God, a fiction novel written by Zora Neale Hurston, expresses the belief that hearing or talking about a certain feature of life can in no way compare to actually experiencing that event. Furthermore, Janie adds to this belief in the novel’s foreword by claiming that, “Yo papa and yo mama and nobody else can’t tell yuh and show yuh.”
Immanuel Kant’s moral theory differs greatly from the other theories we have learned about, especially Mill’s view of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is based on the consequences of actions, while Kantian Ethics focuses on the intentions a person has before they act, and if they are fulfilling their duty as a person when acting. Kant explains his theory by providing examples of different people who are all doing the same action, but for different reasons. He discusses a store owner who charges everyone equal prices and explains that this only has moral worth if he is acting from duty, meaning he does this because it is what is right. The act is not moral if he acts in accordance with duty, or because he is worried about his reputation or business.
The statement that “We should never use a good person as a means to an end” is false. Kant states that the Principle of Humanity is to always treat a human being as an end, and never as a mere means. Kant also believes that you should always respect rational people and should never use anyone or break moral laws no matter what. It is true Kant ’s Principle of Humanity is found under categorical imperative, but categorical imperative is a moral obligation that cannot be unkept no matter what the circumstances may be.