Over the last twenty-two years, there have been more than 130,000 fatal teen crashes. Though these teenagers are legal, trained drivers, what is a solution to reduce the number of lives lost due to these lethal car crashes? Scientists believe that the solution to reducing the amount of deaths would be to raise the driving age and enforce stricter driving laws. Parents, however, are against raising the driving age as they would have to drive their teenager to the movies for a longer period of time. Thus, the driving age should be raised to twenty due to the maturity of people’s brains and understanding of consequences rather than depending on emotions and desires.
First, the driving age should be raised to twenty due to the gradual maturity …show more content…
Teenagers’ brains heavily rely on their emotions rather than the potential consequences of actions. With the constant desire for pleasure, teenagers do not make decisions that reflect their character during the moment in time, which could ultimately lead to devastating consequences. When teenagers make the decision to drive past the speed limit, for example, their emotions are the main influence for their choice of action, and they do not acknowledge the consequences that are a result of their actions. During these situations, the prefrontal cortex, which is the underdeveloped part of the brain, is “all but useless”, forcing teenagers to have to make decisions depending on their emotions rather than the possible consequences of such actions. The prefrontal cortex is responsible for understanding the long-term consequences that would have a major influence on a teenager’s decision. However, it does not fully develop until the one’s twenties, leaving teenagers at risk while driving where they are forced to make precise decisions to sustain themselves. Allowing teenagers to drive at sixteen without the maturity of the prefrontal cortex is a significant factor in their fatal car crashes. With people driving at twenty, their understanding of potential consequences will make them less likely to commit premature decisions on the
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
In this letter, the author argues that all students should be required to take the driver’s education course at Centerville High School which is a mandatory program sponsored by the high school to solve the teenage driving problems in the town of Centerville. He supports his argument by presenting some evidence, however, there can be a number of flaws in his argument, rendering it unconvincing. First, the author assumes that Centerville High School students should take driver’s program because several accidents in and around Centerville have involved teenagers. However, the evidence the author needs to provide that the accidents may have been caused only by Centerville High School students.
In the novel, Brave New World, soma is a drug meant to escape emotions like pain, sadness, and depression. The drug represents the overall well-being of people, so they are always happy and content. In modern society, alcohol functions as soma-like, distorting your reality and making you forget your problems. Another parallel to soma is the societal pressure to drink from advertisements to social pressure. Similarly, the government of Brave New World pushes the usage of soma intensely and the people feel this pressure to consume this drug.
“Every year 500,000 teens are injured in a car wreck. Every year 5,000 teens die in a car wreck meaning an average of 14 teens die a day. Car crashes are the No. 1 killer of teens in the U.S. Even more than alcohol and drug abuse, violence and suicide”. Teens are always excited to earn their license and drive out on the road for the first time, but not every time will be a success, it might also be their last.
Fourth, raising the driving age is not a fair solution to the problem of accidents caused by young drivers. Many young drivers are responsible and cautious on the road, and they should not be punished for the mistakes of a few. Instead, authorities should focus on identifying and addressing the specific causes of accidents involving young drivers. It may be difficult for some families to arrange transportation if their teenagers cannot
Should the Driving Age Be Raised to 18? I take the position that the driving age should not be raised to 18. Many people believe that 16 year olds are too young to drive. However, many 16 to 17 year olds and their families disagree. Teens enjoy their freedom, and not all teens are stereotypically “wild” or “out of hand” on the road.
Many people believe that age doesn’t matter, it’s only the experience that does. Others say age plays a big role due to the fact that the younger the people are, the less mature they act. There are so many reasons to why the driving age should be raised. Thousands of people wonder what could be done to prevent all these tragic fatalities and between all those debates raising the legal age for driving has been the most controversial. Car accidents are reported every day.
You hear that many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive, raising the minimum driving age from 16 to 18 years old. Who would want to experience their first time driving at the age of 18 when it 's better to start at 16? I disagree with the new rule because teens would have to wait longer, you would always have to ask for a ride, and at the age of 16 many teens are cautious and mature enough to drive. As a teenager myself i wouldn 't want to have to wait until I turn 18 to drive. Many teens want to go places with their friends in their own car without having their parents driving them around.
In the news article titled “Is 16 Too Young to Drive a Car?,” Robert Davis investigates the science and legal issues surrounding teens driving. To begin with, Davis reports that many support raising the driving age fatal deaths involving 16 years old driving. The author also explains that politicians want to avoid inconveniencing parent who would have to drive around their unlicensed teens. Furthermore, he reports teens driver errors are linked to underdevelopment the part of the brain that thinks about the future, controls emotions, manages decisions and behavior. In addition, the author explains graduated licensing rules which limits teens driving privileges until they are more mature, but this restriction are not always enforced.
Reform has been at the epicenter of society for years. Humans are far from perfect, and we must work to improve upon our mistakes through change. One blunder that hangs over our heads is the legal driving age of sixteen, and it is imperative that this wrong be righted. As it stands right now, anyone at the age of sixteen can drive a car, granted that they have supervision. But this measly protection pales in comparison with the bigger picture.
The teenage driving age should not be raised because of the safety and emotional health it provides. Teenage driving allows young adults to gain independence. Teenagers spend a lot of time at sporting events, sports practices, after school activities and hanging out with friends, which requires parents to bring them
It’s concluded that making the driving age as a minimum age of sixteen has had a negative impact. This minimum age has affected the road safety negatively. It has caused premature death and severe injuries among teenagers aged 16 and 17 years old. Research suggests that some risks of driving are contributed to the lack of skill and experience. Furthermore, age plays a crucial role in deciding the risks valid in
So establishing the raised driving age, again would be redundant. In conclusion, raising the driving age would be pointless. Delaying the inevitability of car crashes and dependence on another driver are just a few of the many reasons why we should not raise it. It’s just perfect the way it is.