Is bacon actually harmful? Is the bacon at Mcdonald's dangerous? According to the World Health Organization bacon and other processed meat cause cancer. Many authors will write a formal article to spread this message. However, in the article, Bacon gives you cancer. Or does it?, the author Rex Huppke utilizes humour, satire, and undertone to deliver his message. He actually makes fun of Americans by indirectly saying that we they are obsessed with meats and unhealthy living. A big component of his article is humour. Throughout the piece Huppke uses humour to allow the passage to flow and be well understood. For example, he states, “Shut up, World Health Organization. Shut your stupid, baconless mouth.” This humour is specifically a repartee which allows the reader to stay engaged. The reader stays interested in the piece because it uses words, to create insults making the reader laugh. However, this also allows Huppke’s message to come out. Before the quote he says, “On behalf of all Americans…” this little clause shows the …show more content…
It shows the foolishness of Americans, because their thought process surrounds their own wants. They point out other small flaws that will make the opposite party look foolish allowing them to act upon their wants. Today twitter is a big social media site; people around the globe are using it to get their message across. The WHO does the same; however, a small error has been made. In their message about processed meats: flavor is spelled wrong. Here Huppke excites, “WHO THE HELL SPELLS ‘FLAVOR’ WITH A ‘U’?” Sure, this is a stupid mistake, but it’s such a small mistake. Huppke is making fun of Americans because they would use this as an excuse to say, “well the organization is obviously not trustable.” He presents that Americans tend to find excuses, small or big, to keep them from accepting the truth. Which in this case is that processed meat, specifically bacon, is harmful for our human
Corn. Is it delicious? Yes. Do we think about it’s role in our lives when we’re eating it? Probably not.
The one thing that any author must do when writing any sort of essay is to make it comprehensible to the reader. In order to achieve this, the author must utilize anything to get their point across or else the writing would be futile. In Turkeys in the Kitchen , Dave Barry gives his own personal stories about his Thanksgiving and how he feels that men aren’t as useful as women in the terms of the culinary arts (kitchen), Barry’s flippant tone and his use of rhetorical devices such as similes and irony bring forth a light hearted explanation of stereotypes between men and women as well as describing how men are useless in the kitchen. The uses of similes throughout the essay give purpose by showing how men are useless.
Throughout American history, propaganda pieces have been used to sway the public opinion on one matter or another. The famous Federalist Papers were used to sway the early American public to ratify the Constitution. The Civil War also heavily relied on propaganda to recruit soldiers and boost morale. At the turn of the 20th century, Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle was written as a propaganda piece on socialism, however, it was remembered for its cometary on the ethics of the meat packing industry.
Novelist, Eric Schlosser, in his novel, “Fast Food Nation”, expresses how fast food has spread. Schlosser’s purpose is to make us see how addicted we are to fast food. He adopts a shocking tone through the use of diction, Logos, and diction in order to get people to make better choices. For starters, one of the strategies that Schlosser used in this text is diction. Diction can be defined as style of speaking or writing determined by the choice of words by a speaker /writer.
When the audience reads about this they begin to wonder if that statistic specifically refers to them and if there is a problem with eating that amount per year. Eric further informs his audience that the reason McDonalds fries taste so good is from the natural and artificial flavorings added to fries, and most of the processed food in America. He also includes how much revenue the American flavor industries make a year and how many new products they introduce and points out the companies and movements that petitioned for clearer labeling on food products that contain these
However, this is not his only purpose in writing this essay. Additionally, Michael Pollan seeks to reassure the reader that this change will eventually occur and how it will happen. He argues that the food movement of our generation has been successful in changing popular consciousness. However, it has been struggling with shifting, in any impactful way, the “standard American diet,” which he purports has only gotten worse since the 1970s (Envision in Depth p.g
“I 've eaten this food all my life not knowing what was in it and how powerful the food industry was." (Kenner, Food Inc.) “The industry doesn 't want you to know what you 're eating because if you did, then you might not want to eat it" (Kenner, Food Inc.) Ethos components in the film strengthen the documentary claim about the food
In “How Junk Food Can End Obesity,” by David H. Freedman, he claims that processed foods can help fix the obesity crisis in a more realistic manner, rather than whole-some foods. The popular opinion emphasizes whole-some foods because they aren’t informed about the similitude between processed and unprocessed foods. The essence of the essay is that people believe processed foods are bad and unhealthy for us, therefore whole-some foods are highly recommended for the health of an individual. Freedman mentions many prominent authors who wrote books on food processing, but the most influential voice in the food culture Freedman makes a point of is, American journalist, Michael Pollan. The media and Michael Pollan indicate that everything should be replaced with real, fresh, and unprocessed foods, instead of engineering in as much sugar, salt, and fat as possible into industrialized foods.
The beginning of the essay, the tone and diction are both lighthearted and inconsequential- full of basic observations and details. As the argument progresses, the tone shifts to be much more serious, even the footnotes hold a more serious perspective and address more insightful issues. Even in the moments of sincerity, Wallace builds a place of non-threatening engagement, reassuring the audience that he is not an expert either and any decisions about the consumption of meat is an individual one. Such is evident in Footnote 14; Wallace explores the linguistic trends in naming food, then immediately identifies himself as a non-expert by restating that is is just a theory and asking about “biblio-historic reasons” that could unravel his whole
Rhetoric in Panera Advertising Panera is a healthy restaurant. All of their ingredients are natural. All of their products are freshly made. Panera has freshly baked breads, pastries, bagels, soups, salads, and sandwiches. The Panera Bread legacy began in 1981.
Rhetorical analysis Do you believe in order to understand other culture you need to try different food ? These are some ideas of this article from Amy S. Choi a freelance journalist. She wrote this article,“What americans can learn from other food cultures”. Choi betters her argument by providing real stories from other countries.
Advertisement plays a big role in our society and it’s a way of attracting people ‘s attention. For instance, McDonald’s website illustrates a vision of focus, perspectives and colors to approach the audience in a way of selling products only using three methods. These methods are logos, pathos, and ethos. Logos is an argument or form based on a logic, pathos make appeals based on emotions and ethos is the form or appeal of character or credibility. Using these three methods is a way to analysis how McDonalds persuade, inform, and reminder in advertisement.
In both David Zinczenko’s “Don’t Blame The Eater” and “ Radley Balko’s “What You Eat is Your Business”, the argument of obesity in America is present and clear from opposing viewpoints. Both articles were written in the early 2000’s, when the popular political topic of the time was obesity and how it would be dealt by our nation in the future. While Zinczenko argues that unhealthy junk food is an unavoidable cultural factor, Balko presents the thought that the government should have no say in it’s citizens diet or eating habits. Zinczenko’s article was written with the rhetorical stratedgy of pathos in mind.
Rhetoric in Panera’s Advertising Mmm. Panera. Whenever I decide that I want soup I buy a thing of vegetable soup at panera. As long as it’s not lunch hour, I can get my food in less than 10 min. It takes far less for me to gobble it down.
Satire is nowadays found in many artistic forms of expression, including literature, plays, commentary, television shows, and media such as lyrics. In the text “My Satirical Self” the author explains “All these varied entertainments-human emotion on the web, on television, at the movies and between hard-lovers are attuned to the ridiculous in modern life”(Mason). This illustrates that no matter where you go in entertainments there is going to be satire. In today’s society people are accustomed to being around satire, they have accepted this fact by the passage of time. Also, according to the passage “In me straight faced language of a sermon, advocated solving me problem of poverty by selling children as meat - his made was perfect ironic”(Mason).