People who are considering reporting their employer for securities violations under the SEC Whistleblower Program know reporting the possible violations is the right thing to do, yet they still hesitate. It 's difficult to turn in co-workers or supervisors who may also be friends. It 's even more difficult to utilize a company 's own internal reporting system, however, the SEC suggests that people do, unless they have a very good reason not to, such as a fear of retaliation. Employees who utilize their company 's internal reporting system have 120 days to report the information to the SEC: otherwise, it 's not original information.
Employees also hesitate to inform the SEC of possible violations because they initially condoned the act and they fear the SEC will say that they participated in the fraud. In cases like this, individuals should consult an attorney familiar with the SEC Whistleblower Program before submitting the tip.
The only way whistleblowers can anonymously report a possible securities violation under the Whistleblower Program is if an attorney represents them. The attorney becomes an intermediary between the SEC and his or client. An attorney that bills him or herself as an SEC whistleblower advocate will try to clients the largest possible monetary reward from the SEC. The whistleblower 's identity may come out in court;
…show more content…
The Dodd Frank Act 's whistleblower provision is complicated, even with regards to eligibility. Consulting with an SEC Whistleblower Attorney has many advantages in addition to anonymity. An attorney can help a person determine if he or she is eligible for a reward and explain employment protections offered to whistleblowers. In many case, the whistleblower is a bookkeeper, outside auditors or mid-level manager, not an attorney, who might understand the details of the SEC Whistleblower Program. An experienced attorney will help a client maximize their reward by helping their client follow the SEC reporting instructions
In 2002 the Securities Exchange Committee filed the suit against Adelphia Communications Corp and all the members listed previously. Adelphia owned several subsidiary companies and the first SEC suit against them is for hiding the liabilities of Adelphia in these companies. The second was for making false statements to deceive others such as Wall
An organization already in crisis not only requires swift action to correct the situation, it also requires they inform the public of their knowledge as well as display the actions being put into place to remedy the problem and support for those directly affected immediately (Crandall et. al., 2014). This is one of the areas the officials at Penn State failed in their response to the scandal (Stern Strategy Group, 2012). The board of trustees did act swiftly in their termination of former university president Greg Spanier and former head coach of the football team Joe Paterno following the Grand Jury indictment of Jerry Sandusky in 2012. Consequently, the action was still delayed since they had been made aware of the pending indictment in early 2011.
The financial scandals in early 2000s caused the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to be created. Enron, WorldCom and the accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, to intentionally mislead their shareholders by exaggerating their profits and understating their expenses. The scandals had raised the importance of internal control for enhancing corporate governance. Therefore, the government established the SOX to protect the interest of the investors and employees and to monitor the companies and auditors.
According to the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act court ruling of 6-3 which states, whistleblowers will have security against subcontractors, public companies, and private contractors. Any employees who reports that their company has got revenge against them for reporting alleged wrongdoing can conceivably bring legal statements against their employer. In this case Val Riviello would be protected under the Sarabanes-Oxley Act.
How Effective is the Federal Trade Commission In the end of last month we saw FTC Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen speak at a panel titled Federal Online Data Security Regulation: Where Are We Going? in which she shed some light on the agency 's approach towards enforcing data security. She stated that while the Federal Trade Commision simply doesn 't have the time to investigate every reported breach it has a remarkable 70% closure rate in prosecuting data security cases.
“Together with a few friends, Matthew reported what he knew to school administrators, and police ultimately arrested and charged two students involved in the shooting plot.” This sentence from the article is a perfect example of why sometimes it’s a good reason to be a whistle-blower, a whistle-blower is someone who tells for a good purpose. If Matthew decided not to tell them a great deal of lives could have been lost. If Matthew hadn’t told about the shooting, his life could have been cut short and so would many others who went to his school. He wasn’t going to tell originally, but his friends helped him tell
6. Please read this decision by the Iowa Supreme Court in an attorney discipline case and answer these four questions: a. Should judges care if attorneys submit legal briefs or written motions that are plagiarized? Please explain your answer. Yes.
What the employees are afraid of is retaliation from employers. If we take an alternative as forcing the business who violate the law, it would prevent the business from wrongdoing but ultimately result in the whistleblowing losing their
Jerry Sanduski, an assistant football coach for the Penn State, engaging in sexual abuse of children over a period of at least fifteen years. The scandal broke tate Nittany Lions in early November 2011 when Sandusky was indicted on fifty-two counts of child molestation. Although Sandusky's abuse may have begun in the 1970s, he was charged with abuse that occurred between 1994 and 2009. , obstruction of justice, failure to report suspected child abuse, and related charges. The Board of Trustees commissioned an independent investigation by former FBI director Louis Freeh and his law firm.
There is an ethical debate on whistle blowing which mainly is concerned with
Insider trading is when one person has access to information that’s unavailable to the public and will likely have an impact on stock prices. For example, employees might know that their company is going bankrupt before the general public and sell all their stock before it becomes worthless. People who buy the stock will be deceived into thinking its worth more than it really is. In fact, it’s also insider trading for the employees to encourage family and friends to sell their stock using such “inside information.” Insider trading involves difficult moral issues.
The SEC was proactive in the sense that it allows for tips to be sent in, but they did not take fully investigate the tips sent in. One could argue that there was no point in the whistleblowing system if one is not going to investigate the tips sent in. Another thing to note is the psychological effects of being a whistleblower on Harry Markopolos. In order for a whistleblowing system to be effective, the system should contain anonymity, the possibility of reporting to an independent party, provide any means to make the report, and a follow-up. The SEC failed in the follow-up.
early stages of the scandal, the San Francisco based financial institution was investigated by the local Los Angeles City’s Attorney and California state officials. Preliminary investigations revealed the extent of the fraud and malpractice predated as far back as 2011. As a result, on September 8, 2016, federal investigators followed suit and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Agency opened an investigation against Wells Fargo and handed a $185 million penalty to settle the dispute. This settlement would become the largest fine levied in the agency’s history. Of the $185 million, $100 million comprised of fines from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), $50 million originated from the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office, and
And if this is the case, its conduct is closely knitted to the success and failure of it. And as the case of other publicly traded tech giants, like Google. And this is a very interesting fact, anything that these tech giant do can be concealed within its company. However, once there is a whistleblower, there will be a ripple effect seen within the company. A scandal will be in the news and the stocks will fall for that specific company.
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW The review of literature of this study broadly focused on whistleblowing. There have been several attempts to define whistleblowing, but certainly there is no generally accepted definition. According to Near and Miceli (1985), which are often referred by researchers, whistleblowing is a process whereby a current or former member of an organization discloses practices or activities believe to be illegal, immoral or illegitimate, to those who may be able to effect change. The practices or activities can be refer to personal misbehavior such as stealing, waste, mismanagement, safety problems, sexual harassment, unfair discrimination and legal violations (Dasgupta & Kesharwani, 2010).