Sacco And Vanzetti Analysis
Russell Aiuto, in his article “Sacco and Vanzetti,” describes the events that led to and followed the executions of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. On April 15, 1920, two men shot and killed a paymaster and guard in Braintree, Massachusetts. The two men escaped with three accomplices, successfully nabbing nearly 16,000 dollars. Although five men were involved, only two, Sacco and Vanzetti, were ever arrested, tried, and convicted for the crime. The trial against Sacco and Vanzetti was poorly conducted. Prosecution leader Frederick Katzmann cross examined the two suspects in a bad fashion. Furthermore, the verdict was determined without enough concrete evidence.
Soon after the South Braintree theft, Sacco and Vanzetti were arrested.
…show more content…
In the Sacco and Vanzetti trial of 1921 however, this was not the case. There was a large gap in what prosecution and defense claimed to have happened, and even today, there is much speculation on the truth behind the prosecution’s accusations and proof. When discussing the trial, Aiuto, in his article “Sacco and Vanzetti,” describes the prosecution 's strategy (aside from cross examination). According to Aiuto, “The case for the prosecution was developed along three principal lines. First, Katzmann produced eye-witnesses... Second, Katzmann centered on the bullets... The third line of the prosecution’s case was ‘consciousness of guilt’” (Aiuto 5). Prosecution planned to persuade Sacco and Vanzetti’s guilt by placing them on the scene of the crime, proving that the bullets were fired from their weapons, and that they acted guilty. Strangely enough, only one of the eleven witness actually saw the shooting, and even the one ducked for cover once it began. Also, both Sacco and Vanzetti had alabi’s that placed them away from the crime scene. Next the gun analyst for the prosecution could only skeptically claim that one of the bullets was fired from Sacco’s gun, whereas Katzmann took this answer, claimed it was true and fed it to the Jury. On the last count of acting guilty, Sacco and Vanzetti were able to answer, that carrying arms were because of safety or transportation of money, and
The Trial Of Nicola Sacco And Bartolomeo Vanzetti
151 Words | 1 PagesThe Sacco Vanzetti trial was a trial that occurred during the time of the Red scare where people feared and accused others of communism. Unfortunately for these two italian men known as Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were accused of robbery and murder at the Slater and Morrill shoe factory in South Braintree in 1921. Later on both men were executed on April, 9 1927. The Sacco and Vanzetti trial was considered a witch hunt due to the red scare and the little evidence that was disproven.
Compare And Contrast Croaker V. Clarke
386 Words | 2 PagesFACTS: The defendant (Lake) encountered Clarke sitting on the beach and he demanded Clarke’s white car keys for several times. But, when Clarke refused, Lake pulled out a gun and walked Clarke out to the water. At that time, Clarke saw his friend (Croaker) and he called out to warn her. Thereafter, Lake saw her and demanded her car’s keys. When she refused, he held the gun to Croaker’s head and she gave him the keys.
Randall Dale Adams Case
908 Words | 4 PagesDavid told the cops that he was in the car when Randal Dale Adams shot the gun. The cops then began to question Randal Dale Adams and had him sign a statement which only stated what the two men had done during the day and that they had passed by where the murder took place and that was a false confession given by Adams. There were also two eyewitnesses who also had claimed to see the car and identify Adams as the person who shot the officer. The police were determined to find the killer because it was one of their fellow officers. When the case went to trial and there was a false confession by Adams, eyewitnesses along with the officer who had been in the car stating that the person who killed her partner had the same color hair as Adam the jury found Randal Dale Adams guilty.
Was Johnny Justified For Johnny's Murder?
266 Words | 2 PagesOn the night of the murder, five drunken Socs pull up on the street and attacked Johnny and Ponyboy. One of the Socs tried drowning Ponyboy while at the same time Johnny felt threatened by another Socs named Bob which led to Johnny killing him in self defense. Johnny is justified in what he did and is not guilty because he was defending himself from the Socs. The Socs had threatened to harm Johnny and Ponyboy earlier that night and Johnny recognized Bob as someone who had attacked him before. Johnny recognized Bob from the last time he got jumped in the abandoned lot.
Mr. Douglas Abandonment Of The Scrowers In California
1174 Words | 5 PagesOne of the most peculiar cases in the investigative community just occurred a few months ago. When Mr. John Douglas was murdered by the Scrowers a group of criminals who hailed from Vermissa Valley also known to residents as the Valley of fear. The Scrowers had been terrorizing Vermissa valley for years until Douglas who at the time was a Pinkerton agent whose real name was Birdy Edwards infiltrated the dangerous Scrower organization to take them down and bring them to the hands of justice. Many Scrowers faced various forms of imprisonment and the leader of the Scrowers John Mcginty was sentenced to death. “ Mr. Douglas was a bright mind subject to the impossible job of taking down a illegal organization and also escaping with his
In Search Of Sacco And Vanzetti By Susan Tejanda
491 Words | 2 PagesTejada does a fantastic job at telling the story of both Sacco and Vanzetti and their accusations. While still telling and explaining what actually happened in the court cases, Tejanda also goes into details on different stories and experiences that people claimed to happen that might not have been used in court. While both Sacco and Vanzetti were executed for the presumed murder and robbery at the Slater and Morrill shoe factory, there still to this day isn’t clear evidence proving that they actually did or did not commit this crime. Tejanda uses a plethora of sources throughout the book and accurately documents all of the sources that she gets them from to try to inform the reader about the most that is known about this case, showing all the readers that no matter how much evidence there is, there can still be age-old
Summary Of Ernie's Lunchroom Murder Case
560 Words | 3 PagesOne piece of evidence which leads us towards the culprit is the handprint located on the wall where the shooter placed their right hand. This handprint shows that the shooter shot the gun with their left hand. As a rule, someone who shoots a gun with their left hand is likely left-handed. This leads us to believe that the culprit is left-handed. A second piece of evidence discovered at the scene of the crime is the sets of footprints left behind on the wet floor.
Leroy Orange Research Paper
718 Words | 3 PagesThe False Accusation of an innocent man Leroy Orange puts him onto Death Row. Leroy Orange and his half brother Leonard Kidd were accused for the murder of 4 people, who I will go into more depth later. From a corrupt cops torture Orange to the verge of death. Leroy Orange was accused of Charges of murders, concealment of homicidal death and aggravated arson.
Who Is Responsible For Al Capone's Downfall
1184 Words | 5 PagesValentine’s Day Massacre” started the downfall of the Al Capone power scandal (Alphonse Gabriel “Al” Capone – From Obscurity to Chicago Outfit Boss). He was arrested on a weapons charge in Philadelphia in 1929 and served nine months in jail. The year before his arrest Fred Wilson, a treasury agent, had begun looking into his income taxes. Even though the supreme court had just made a ruling that required everyone, even criminals, to pay income taxes. Everyone knew that Capone was making millions of dollars a year, but had never reported any income or paid any taxes to the government.
History Vs. Hollywood: The Untouchables
1487 Words | 6 PagesHistory Vs. Hollywood: The Untouchables The Untouchables is an action packed movie, set in Chicago, 1920s. Crime controls the city, the system has gone corrupt, and people are dying.
Eyewitnesses: 60-Minute Segment Of Ronald Cotton And Jennifer Thompson
702 Words | 3 PagesThis week’s topic was very interesting to learn about how important eyewitnesses can be when a crime and accidents do occur. In the case that was presented in the 60-minute segment of Ronald Cotton and Jennifer Thompson is exactly how legal system can fail us when it comes to the eyewitnesses’ identification testimony and how a person’s perception and memory can be altered. The aspect of psychology and law research from this week’s course material is most relevant to the topic of perception and memory. The memory has different stages the first is encoding the process of entering perception into memory.
Murder On A Sunday Morning Analysis
681 Words | 3 PagesAs you are shown in the film, after the identification of Brenton Butler and his so-called testimony to investigators, the police and prosecutors just stopped working on the case. Thus, evidence that would have supported Butler’s innocence and help find the actual killer weren’t discovered until Brenton’s defense attorney, Pat McGuinness did some investigation and research of his own. Thus, flowing from film from the trial to McGuinness’s investigation scenes shows the how he attained the information that he and his partner could present in the courtroom. While the prosecutors only had the one eyewitness, who claimed to have only caught a glimpse of the shooter and gave description that did not even match Butler. The film presents the conclusion that the police did not actually do the work to find the actual killer and if it wasn’t for Pat McGuinness and his partner wanting to find the culprit, it would never actually be solved.
The Lindbergh Case: Bruno Richard Hauptmann
1140 Words | 5 PagesOn October 8,1934 Hauptmann is indicted for murder and his trial began in January 3,1935. The case used circumstanul evidance. A wood expert confirmed the markings on the wood board that was used in the kidnap ladder matched those of Hauptmann’s tools in his garage. A important piece of evidence was that Hauptmann not being able to provide an alibi on the night of the kidnapping. Experts testifed that Hauptmann wrote the ransom notes his handwriting samples matched.
Cruelty: Unidentified Serial Killers
920 Words | 4 PagesJudges said that because of how planned out the murders were, taking videos and such, that they were perfectly aware of their actions and not insane. Detective Bogdan Vlasenko stated: "We think they were doing it as a hobby, to have a collection of memories when they get
Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 PagesThis is an important element when deciding who the best and worst jurors were. There were no facts as to who was right or wrong because we didn’t see the crime in question. All
More about Sacco And Vanzetti Analysis
The Trial Of Nicola Sacco And Bartolomeo Vanzetti
151 Words | 1 PagesCompare And Contrast Croaker V. Clarke
386 Words | 2 PagesRandall Dale Adams Case
908 Words | 4 PagesWas Johnny Justified For Johnny's Murder?
266 Words | 2 PagesMr. Douglas Abandonment Of The Scrowers In California
1174 Words | 5 PagesIn Search Of Sacco And Vanzetti By Susan Tejanda
491 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Ernie's Lunchroom Murder Case
560 Words | 3 PagesLeroy Orange Research Paper
718 Words | 3 PagesWho Is Responsible For Al Capone's Downfall
1184 Words | 5 PagesHistory Vs. Hollywood: The Untouchables
1487 Words | 6 PagesEyewitnesses: 60-Minute Segment Of Ronald Cotton And Jennifer Thompson
702 Words | 3 PagesMurder On A Sunday Morning Analysis
681 Words | 3 PagesThe Lindbergh Case: Bruno Richard Hauptmann
1140 Words | 5 PagesCruelty: Unidentified Serial Killers
920 Words | 4 PagesReasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 Pages