Shays Rebellion Research Paper
Shay's Rebellion in 1786 took a while to put down. There was no army to break them up and the system that kept the poor, poor was breaking down through its promised contracts. Then a year later a strong central government was made to put a stop to the rebellions and control the people. This new constitution offered little and exclusive rights as a pacifier to stop further rebellions. Britain and European roots drive in the U.S having an economic interest over freedom. Layers of self-interest are threaded within the Consitution as unnecessary compromises for the rights and liberties given to the excluded. Their self-interest could not be achieved without disrupting a correct and unbiased, balanced government from the beginning. This needs to keep the rich and the poor divided the country and the start of rebellions. These rebellions were merchants fighting the injustices. With every group stopped showing the example of scenting rebels to death would never mute or satisfy the public to accept things as they were. More chaos would continue on. As the country evolves more outrage over being inequality for all, as The Constitution promises, will have to be corrected by new transforming generations of …show more content…
The constitution was written for elites by elites. Men with interests to stay wealthy and keep the peace, gather together with their own concerns and the masses second. The need for a large and central government to control the state override the need for equality for all. Charles Beard said, “The rich must, their own interest either controls the government directly or control the laws by which government operates.” Those who gathered together to defeat a common enemy which was anything stopping their own economic interest. This was the common man with no property, the indentured servant, woman, and certainly not the slave or the
An Economic Interpretation Of The Constitution By Charles Beard Summary
262 Words | 2 PagesAn Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States was written by Charles Beard in 1913 and describes Beards opinion on the Constitution of the United States at an economic standpoint. Beard believes the constitution was written by rich landholders who wanted their land to be protected. In order for their land to be protected, the lower class would be expensed. He found out that many land owners had “personalty” which is extra land to the West, trading stocks and other money related items. Beard claimed the slaveholders or higher class were not influenced by philosophy, instead just wanting money for themselves and not thinking of the classes below them.
Northwest Ordinance Of 1787
665 Words | 3 PagesRiyana Patel 12/6/15 Mr. Riotto US 1 H Chapter 7 Summary The chapter starts of with a detailed description of events before a series of protests from 1786-1787 known as Shay’s Rebellion, led by Daniel Shay in Western Massachusetts. This rebellion was to overthrow the state government by going against the Springfield arsenal; this movement was an example of the weakened government and led to the ratification and adoption of the United States Constitution. With the end of the royal authority the Continental Congress became the national government and formed state governments that were governed by the people. Although by the end of 1777 Articles of Confederation were proposed by John Dickinson, in order to help keep
Shays Rebellion Research Paper
270 Words | 2 PagesLast night on February 4, 1787, General Benjamin Lincoln attacked members of the Shays’ Rebellion, and successfully captured 150 of the rebels. As a result, Daniel Shays left Massachusetts and fled to Vermont. Shays Rebellion was an armed rebellion consisting of 1,200 angry farmers from Massachusetts. They caused major chaos in this state. On December 26, 1786 Daniel Shays and the rebels revolted in Springfield, Massachusetts insisting that the state legislature address their issues, such as lack of money.
Daniel Shays Rebellion Research Paper
329 Words | 2 PagesA is an incorrect statement because Daniel Shays did not get killed or executed as a result of the conflict. In the source titled, "Mount Vernon" it stated that "Many participants were later captured and most men, including Shays, eventually received amnesty as part of a general pardon. " Daniel Shays was not hung, rather he was released back to his family where he later died in September 1825. Answer choice B is the legitimate answer because in the book for this class it says, "The state government [Massachusettes] responded by sending 4,400 militiamen.
Zinn Vs Schweikart Analysis
510 Words | 3 PagesEric Harris Rough Draft Friday Paper 10/29/2015 Zinn vs Schweikart and Allen In A People’s History of the United States (1980) by Howard Zinn, he makes the argument that the US Constitution was written to protect the selfish economic interests of the wealthy. Zinn has plenty of logical information to back his statement up, but in A Patriot’s History of the United States (2004) by Schweikart and Allen opposes the idea. They argue that the constitution was written to promote selfless ideas of unity and political truth like it should have. Schweikart and Allen feel that true patriots are ignored due to too much emphasis on political correctness.
Shay's Rebellion Dbq Essay
867 Words | 4 PagesIn the late 1700’s, it was America’s goal to create a republic that had a representative government that was based upon the approval of the people. Unfortunately, the people feared a strong central government because of the previous trouble the colonies had when they were ruled by Britain. They were always being unfairly taxed and had very few rights. In order to avoid this, a very weak government was developed that seemed to satisfy the people, but would not satisfy the well being of the country. It wasn’t until Shay’s rebellion which brought light to the fact that the Articles of Confederation were not going to cut it, so the Constitutional Convention was created and convened to find an alternative solution which was the creation of the Constitution.
Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution
1511 Words | 7 PagesLectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..
Examples Of Shay's Rebellion
776 Words | 4 Pages“Let the people take arms. The remedy is to present them with the facts, pardon, and pacify them.” (A letter by Thomas Jefferson, paragraph 2). Shays’ Rebellion was a group of American citizens that were fighting for their rights and were against taxation during the 1780s. Although many people perceive Shays and his followers as rebels, nevertheless Shays’ and his followers were freedom fighters because the government were treating others unfairly, the justice system was full of revenge, hatred, etc., and the wealthy became more rich from taxes.
Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay
827 Words | 4 PagesHence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.
Essay On The Great Compromise
298 Words | 2 PagesThe Great Compromise which was founded at the Constitutional Convention wasn't formed without trouble. Many of the delegates that participated in the convention were wealthy landowners and lawyers, who owned many slaves. They failed to notice the diversity that excited within the nation. As they talked how to repair the Articles of Confederation, issues would arise that would create continuous debates amongst each other. One of the issues that would arise would be the nature of the new government.
Differences Between The Constitution And The Articles Of Confederation
565 Words | 3 PagesFollowing British General Charles Cornwallis’ surrender at the Battle of Yorktown in the Revolutionary War, the United States, now no longer under British rule, was in dire need of a new government. Consequently, the Articles of Confederation government was formed in November of 1777, and was finally ratified by the states in 1781. The Articles of Confederation created a loose alignment of sovereign states, where the central government was incredibly weak, with almost no powers. After Shay’s rebellion, in which a group of farmers revolted against the over taxation and underrepresentation of those on the American frontier, and the subsequent failure of the government to do anything, a new, stronger government was created in the form of the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution is a radical departure from the Articles of Confederation because of it centralized the
Us Constitution Dbq
446 Words | 2 PagesThe US Constitution was created in 1787. It was all about putting confidence in the citizens that they would be taken care of no matter what. It was very important to the people who wrote the Constitution that everything that was written would come to firmition. In certain situations the Constitution was held to its principles and in some instances it fell flat. When talking about the Whiskey Rebellion, Jefferson did a good job trying to support the citizens of the States.
The Constitution: The Fight Against Tyranny
636 Words | 3 PagesThe first way the Constitution guards against tyranny is the system of Checks and Balances. The Federalist Paper #51 has a quote from James Madison from the year 1788 it says “... the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…
The Philosophies Of The Founding Fathers
885 Words | 4 PagesThey believed that because people are instinctively selfish, that people would have a hard time coexisting in a land where all people were supposed to be treated equal. Though the government was created to aid the people, it was also established to teach the people how to “live properly”. The fact that the constitution was written in the mindset that people needed to be, in a sense, controlled is was and remains a controversial topic. Many view the constitution’s favor for the rich, white, and male property owners was not so much of an “easier way to unify a nation” but more of a list of who it was going to be more desireable to govern. These facts aside, in order to instill equality to a newlywed nation, the people were given some basic human rights and the power to choose who was going to represent them in order to still make sure that the people were still the basis of the new government while still having control over them.
Similarities Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists
687 Words | 3 PagesUnder the Articles of Confederation, the United States government was in shambles. Having left the rule of the British Crown, the States desired a government far from their previous predecessor. However, having given tremendous power to the states and very little to the federal, there was much chaos. A prime example of the failure of this document was Shay’s Rebellion, when farmers rebelled against government officials for debt that they could not repay due to faults in the Articles. Consequently, a new Constitution had to be ratified which resulted in many compromises between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
More about Shays Rebellion Research Paper
An Economic Interpretation Of The Constitution By Charles Beard Summary
262 Words | 2 PagesNorthwest Ordinance Of 1787
665 Words | 3 PagesShays Rebellion Research Paper
270 Words | 2 PagesDaniel Shays Rebellion Research Paper
329 Words | 2 PagesZinn Vs Schweikart Analysis
510 Words | 3 PagesShay's Rebellion Dbq Essay
867 Words | 4 PagesAlexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution
1511 Words | 7 PagesExamples Of Shay's Rebellion
776 Words | 4 PagesRatification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay
827 Words | 4 PagesEssay On The Great Compromise
298 Words | 2 PagesDifferences Between The Constitution And The Articles Of Confederation
565 Words | 3 PagesUs Constitution Dbq
446 Words | 2 PagesThe Constitution: The Fight Against Tyranny
636 Words | 3 PagesThe Philosophies Of The Founding Fathers
885 Words | 4 PagesSimilarities Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists
687 Words | 3 Pages