Should College Athletes be Paid? Every season, the nation is captivated by the complex world of college athletics. Many teenagers, myself included, love to watch college football and March Madness with friends and family. Aside from college athletics, many people also watch the NBA (National Basketball Association) & NFL (National Football League), and these professional athletes make millions of dollars every single year. This raises the question: do college athletes deserve to be paid? To the untrained eye, college athletes receive an education, coaches make a living, and the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) keeps the well oiled machine running. The NCAA is simply an association of institutions and members which provide pathways of opportunity …show more content…
After dissecting the dilemma of payment for college athletes, one may discover that oftentimes the only incentive college athletes receive is a full athletic scholarship to the college/university, as opposed to a salary. There must be a reason as to why the college athletes do not receive a salary even though they generate billions of dollars for the NCAA. There are numerous sources illustrating pros and cons regarding whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Some argue that athletes should be paid because they are forced to endure unhealthy environments and unfair treatment, struggle through the “plantation system”, want support for themselves, etc. Opposers of this argument state that athletes should not be paid because of financial irresponsibility, education equaling money, university offering more than education, loss of passion for the game, etc. Throughout this paper, the reasons to pay, not to pay, and other details will be discussed so one can formulate an opinion on the
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Horace Michell in his article, “Students Are Not Professional Athletes,” and Dave Zirin in her article, “An Economist Explains Why College Athletes Should Be Paid.",” offers differing views on why student athletes should and or shouldn’t be paid. Horace States that College Athletes are not proficient competitors who are paid pay rates and motivating forces for a profession in games. They are students getting access to a school instruction through their cooperation in games, for which they procure grants to pay educational cost, charges, food and lodging, and other permissible costs. University games are not a vocation or calling. It is the understudies' vehicle to an advanced education degree.
Should College Athletes Be Paid Regge D. Dayton Madison High School Intro How would you feel if college students were being paid to play sports at a collegiate level? Many people feel it is the right thing to do because of all of the work they put into the game. While others feel these athletes are already being rewarded enough with others things that they are given. College athletes make their school a lot of money, bring a lot of attention and entertainment to the world while putting a lot of effort into the sport, but these athletes are given scholarships along with other things; Therefore these college athletes should not be paid for playing collegiate sports.
For a century the National Collegiate Athletic Association has been around governing the organization for millions of college athlete. In the recent year, though, many people have been asking whether or not college athletes should be paid to play their sports in college, in particular, Division One male football and basketball players. The Paying of college athletes concept is in its resolution and plan, however the history of this issue dates back two decades and has proven both ineffective and discriminatory. The negative inherency of this new potential solution would far outweigh any minute advantages that the opposition will attempt to present as a positive change.
Dalton Collins Berthot English III 2/24/2017 College Athletes Should Not Be Paid College athletes are given scholarships to cover their tuition and other expenses in college, so should they be paid a salary for their athletic performances as well? They are receiving something far more valuable than a chance to play college ball. They are receiving an education that will provide for them and last a lifetime. College athletes should not be paid to perform on the field or the court. Whether college athletes should be paid or not is a topic that is debated more and more these days.
Should college athletes be paid? I think they should. I found three main reason why other people and myself think that college athletes deserve pay. One, you can just pay the sports that produce the most revenue. Two, these student athletes put in lots of work and even sometimes have to miss class to go to the sports event.
College athletes should get paid to pay because they dedicate a lot of time to their teams, they do not have time for a job, the school receives a great amount of money from the games that they perform in, and a salary would help student-athletes learn how to
Should college athletes get paid? People have been asking this question for many years and people still don’t know the answer to it. That are people who are for paying athletes while there’s also a group that are against, some of the people that are for paying athletes are ex-college players and coaches and the people that are against are mostly people that work for the NCAA. Many people have different points of view on rather the athletes should get paid. There is some sport analysis that thinks that college athletes shouldn’t be paid for many reasons, one reason is the fact that the athletes already receive a free scholarship and they believe that covers for all the money they bring in from competitions.
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
NCAA has various views on college athletes getting paid. On NCAA.org, they push for more success in academics than in athletics. School work will be put before the time spent on the court to ensure that they know their main purpose for going to that specific college, according to NCAA. For the people who like to give their opinions on the situation, the past years have seen good days and bad days in where as people, even fans,think that college athletes are somehow not given enough benefits. NCAA states, Most of the money made off of the athletic program doesn’t go to the people that actually make the profits rise.
One of the biggest debates in sports right now is if collegiate athletes should be paid to play. March Madness, a college basketball tournament that goes on for a month in March grosses around 900 million dollars which go to the NCAA and the colleges that participate in it. However, the college players don’t make any of that money. Rather the college athletes have to work hard all season and don’t make any money off of their play. College athletes should get paid though there are economical, educational, social and legal reasons why they wouldn’t be able to get paid.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
In my personal opinion, college athletes should be paid due to seeing first-hand the immense amount of dedication the players put into their sport. I believe that by placing their sport above all else, making it a sole factor of their focus, athletes treat their participation in their sport as a full time job. Being required to practice year around taking up most, if not all spare time that they aren’t in class or studying, makes maintaining an outside job or way to make money seems nearly impossible. According to Mark Edelman from Forbes.com, the typical Division I college athlete devotes around 43.3 hours per week to his or her sport and maintaining his or her scholarship. Not only are they spending over 40 hours per week towards these sports related demands, but they are also required to spend around 50 hours per week towards their academics.