College Athletes Being Paid: An Annotated Bibliography
Bouchrika, Imed. “Why Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Research.Com, 21
Apr. 2023, research.com/education/why-should-college-athletes-be-paid. In “Why Should College Athletes Be Paid” author Imed Bouchrika first begins by explaining what college athletics are and what role they play in some students’ lives. Bouchrika details the Student-Athlete Compensation System, which includes the $3.7 billion provided by the NCAA to DI and DII colleges for athletic scholarships. Bouchrika then moves into the main idea of his article, why should college athletes be paid? He states several pros and cons, such as payment is the equal to a work-study basis. The money given to student-athletes
…show more content…
He works with the European commision on the Scovis project as well. Bouchrika has collaborated with several other great authors and scientists in his many international projects around the world. He has made many other articles, fairly often using credible sources that he lists at the end of each reading.
Drozdowski, Mark J. “Should College Athletes Be Paid?: BestColleges.”
BestColleges.com, Best Colleges, 10 Mar. 2023. https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/analysis/2021/09/07/should- college-athletes-be-paid/. In “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” author Mark Drozdowski begins by listing the multiple deals signed with colleges to provide student-athletes with gear and equipment. He then states how college athletes are not provided salaries, but instead they are given scholarships. Drozdowski finishes his article by giving pros and cons of the subject, like how paying student athletes is needed compensation from the always occurring chance that they get injured, or how paying athletes will get messy with how much they pay each
…show more content…
Reasons Why or Why Not?” author Unknown goes over the NCAA vs. Alston ruling, which is when colleges were given the power to reward their athletes for their name, image, and likeness. They then explain why student athletes are not being paid by their schools, and what a name, image, and likeness agreement is. It is then written how student athlete scholarships actually work and what the difference is between a full versus a partial scholarship. They then list cons of paying college athletes, like how scholarships are the fairest form of compensation for them and how paying athletes diminishes the spirit of
The debate of whether not college athletes should be paid has been going on for a couple decades now. With college institutions gaining revenue from football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, Dr. Dennis Johnson thinks that “There now is a clamoring for compensating both football and basketball players beyond that of an athletic scholarship” (2012). On the other hand, Dr. John Acquaviva is satisfied with the current college system in which colleges provide athletic scholarships which reward a free college education in return for representing the university’s athletic program (2012). Dr. Johnson then follows up Dr. Aquaviva’s claim with his five selling points for the paying of college athletes and Dr. Aquaviva provides five points
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
College sports have become a big business in recent years, with universities and the NCAA earning billions of dollars in revenue from television deals, merchandise sales, and other sources. However, the athletes who generate this revenue are not compensated for their participation in sports. This has led to a growing debate about whether college athletes should be paid for their participation in sports. The exploitation of college athletes and the significant revenue they generate for universities and the NCAA without any direct compensation for their participation in sports necessitates the need for paying them. This would not only address their financial challenges and ensure a level playing field but also provide fair compensation for their
“When you pay student-athletes, you give them the chance to earn money to buy necessities in their daily life” (College Raptor). How do college athletes survive if they can not make any extra money if they are so focused on the game? “Between their games and practices they do not have time to work” (College Raptor). Many college athletes deserve to be paid because of how much dedication and time they have given to their college and the sport they play. In conclusion, athletes could focus on their sport instead of paying for rent and food.
Jack Evans S. Blount Assignment 4 - Argumentative Research Paper – Final Draft May 4, 2023 Should college athletes be paid? American intercollegiate athletics are deeply engrained into the college culture and are beloved by students and spectators alike. Collegiate national championships are just a few examples of athletic events that draw in thousands of spectators, millions of televised viewers and over a billion dollars annually for universities across the country. The business of collegiate athletics is enormous.
College Athletes: Should They Get Paid? The controversial debate on whether or not collegiate athletes should be able to profit from their name, image, and likeness has been going on for as long as the brain can think. Each year, year-round, college athletics generate tens of thousands of dollars for their respective institutions, only for athletes to see none of that money. It is believed by many that the scholarships athletes receive is enough to compensate, along with the presented argument that allowing college athletes to make money makes college athletics political and takes away from integrity of the business. To oppose, not all sports give athletic scholarships, and even when they do, it still isn’t enough to compensate for an athletes’
Throughout the past few years, countless arguments have been made regarding if college athletes should get paid. Dismissing the Name, Image, and Likeness deal (NIL) and how athletes receive compensation for that matter, they do not obtain money like a salary. Despite the fact that the athletes are the ones who agree to continue their sport at an advanced level with the knowledge of no pay, they should at least gain a slight amount of income before, during, and after their season. These athletes play for the NCAA, National College Athletic Association, and they draw in a great deal of revenue, but do not acquire the same in return along with their effort, drive, and enthusiasm. Being a college athlete is predominantly a full-time job, so if
Football, basketball, and baseball, in particular, generate billions of dollars a year for colleges in ticket sales, merchandise sales, and advertisements” (Drew 1). Because of how much money is being earned by a school, college athletes could earn some of this money. But, the school might use the money on other things such as campus needs. But, “ensuring that student-athletes are paid may not only alleviate the financial burden that some families face when sending their children to college. It may also encourage college athletes to stay for education before going pro” (Bouchrika 4).
As the NCAA revenue continues to climb, pressure to pay student athletes is growing(“Why college athletes deserve compensation” 1).Former NFL player Michael Bennett told ESPN, “Heck yeah college athletes should be paid(Reasons Why Student Athletes Should Be Paid” 2).He says “NCAA gets paid, Rose Bowl gets paid, everybody gets paid except the people making the product(“Reasons Why Student Athletes Should Be Paid” 2). There is an extreme amount of attention brought to curtain sports around the world, and that is Football, and Basketball(“Why College Athletes Should Be Compensated” 1). These sports alone generate Billions of dollars every year for just such a short period of time, and this revenue that is being brought in from not only these two sports, but the other sports that other 4-year universities may have, is not being used in the right ways(“Why College Athletes Should Be Compensated” 2). The money that is being brought in every year seems to never find the student
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
Educate Do Not Compensate In an article by Jim Delany and Andrea Williams it states “College sports is one of the of the biggest things going on in March”. Although some people think that college athletes should get paid for all the work they put into the sport for the school on their jersey. It is a big discussion since they are not pro-athletes and that only professionals should get paid. This may be a problem because of the schools tuition and not all schools would be able to pay the athletes.
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.