Serving in the military is something that all people, disabled, hard of hearing, deaf, anyone should be able to do. Yet hundreds of motivated hard of hearing or deaf Americans are not given the chance to serve. which, in my opinion is unfair because they should atleast be given a chance.
Keith Nolan has always had a lifelong dream of serving in the military, he was drawn to serving. Keith first completed some levels of Army ROTC programs, He completed the physical training portion without an interpreter, but was not allowed to move forward. The defense program sets medical standards, which includes hearing and if you are not hearing you must have implants. Then the HR 1722 was introduced.
The HR 1722 is the Keith Nolan Air Force Deaf Demonstration Act. This creates room for about 20 people with hearing loss or hearing problems who also qualify to serve in the military. The bill was introduced by a Senator whose name is Tom Harkin. Harkin thought that the military would be the best place to start this act.
…show more content…
The bill has gotten good reviews and a lot of support but some critics do not believe its a good idea. The critics believe that this is going to change the medical requirements for being able to serve. That is not the point of this bill at all, the point of this bill is to create an amazing opportunity for deaf or hard of hearing individuals to serve. There are so many opportunities the military has and there are tons of talented and dedicated individuals that would love to serve. We are missing out on having talented people serve our country because of a hearing
As a result, as it appears right now, the Stevie Sellows Act does not have any impact on the service recipients. Therefore, we need guidance whether to scrap it or make an amendment to the
As well as the challenge of many professionals encouraging put in hearing aids, making their child “hearing impaired”. Hearing parents are usually unsure of what to do, and end up following the path the professionals recommend. The book really helps emphasize the importance of not doing that. Instead, exposing a the child into the Deaf community would be the best option. They’ll be welcomed with wide arms, and it will help them feel most true to themselves.
At the time of this resolution Democrats controlled the House 257 to 178(U.S House of Representatives): meaning that Democrats also controlled the rules committee (Sinclair 24). This control allows them to determine what amendments make it to the floor, and prohibit any amendments that delay or shift focus away from the legislation. This tactic of using the rules strategically for political gain was first coined by Democrats in the 1980s (Sinclair 32). Before coming to a vote the House agreed on amendments from Representatives Ackerman (D-NY-5), Kucinich (D-OH-10), Pascrell (D-NJ-8), and Murphy(D-PA-8): amendments strategically all introduced by Democrats. Of these three none offered substantive change to the bill.
Kristi House is a child advocacy center that is involved in meeting the legal, medical and emotional needs of child victims of sexual abuse, sex trafficking and sexually exploited children. With this legislation and grants, clients will receive an effective and enhance respond from the authorities. 2. Given the above information, discuss why you either support or do not support this legislation. If you feel the legislation has both positive and negative impacts, please list why and include your critical analysis.
The majority of the Senate and the House of Representatives is Republican, and they would never let this get passed. First, the bill would be introduced into the right committee, and that committee has to pass the bill before it can even make it to the floor for a vote. The committee chairman is the senator who is in charge of a committee, and the chairman is a member of the majority party, which is Republican. Also, all of the committees are made up of the majority party being the majority of the committees. Sa a Democrat senator would have to persuade a Republican majority committee to pass the bill so it can go to the floor of the senate.
This essay will be looking into the purpose of Public Law 94-142 and how it impacted the deaf community—for better or worse.
Tejinder Singh, writer and contributor of Scotus, argues that the stolen Valor Act is "unconstitutional because the government had not shown that the statute is necessary to protect the integrity of the system of military honors . . . [and] the Stolen Valor Act posed a significant—and perhaps unique—threat to protected speech. " On the contrary, the Stolven Valor Act does not violate the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment, but instead enforces the appreciation of our soldiers. If Fields had been convicted because he preached that he deserved the Purple Heart and contributed as much as an eight-year veteran of the military, then the Stolven Valor Act would have violated his First Amendment rights because he would be denied to publically share his opinion, and thus denied his freedom of
Women continue to disprove the stereotype that they are too “frail and delicate” to serve in the armed forces. Equality means equal rights and equal responsibilities, and if a woman can meet the same requirements mandatory for men to join the armed forces, she should be eligible for the draft. Even if the majority of citizens able to meet the requirements is still men, this would be fair as it gives all women the opportunity to attempt, and those who do meet the requirements will be able to serve their country in a time of
Mike Royko describes the Veteran’s Administration 's treatment of Leroy Bailey in his article, “A Faceless Man’s Plea” published in the Chicago Daily News. Royko’s purpose was to expose the unfair treatment of veteran’s such as Leroy Bailey. He uses a frustrated and critical tone to convey the inefficiency and hypocrisy of the Veteran’s Administration. Royko centers the beginning of his article on Leroy Bailey, a Vietnam War veteran who was sent to the infantry and was later on injured by a rocket at the age of twenty-six.
The topic that I have chosen is whether transgender people should be allowed into the military. I will be campaigning for the side that transgender people should be allowed to join the military just like everyone else. The opposing viewpoint is that transgender people should not be allowed into the military. Just because someone is transgender does not make them any different than anyone else, so why should they not be allowed into the U.S armed forces? How would you feel if you were denied a part in defending your country just because you are different?
Davis talks about how the bill has had so much trouble in getting passed. She says, “The bill was filed on February 13th. It was referred to health and human services on March 19th, excuse me, February 20th. There was a senate hearing on the bill March 19th. It was reported out of the committee on March 26th and it died on the senate intent calendar” (Paragraph 5).
It was a double-standard. It was a waste of time and funds trying to enforce something they can’t. Especially if lawmakers can’t follow the laws themselves (document
This slower process lets government slow down and seriously consider the pros and cons of a certain bill, and make a clean
As an addition to my education background, some of my other qualification that will allow me to qualify for your program is my passion for making a difference within the deaf community. My ability to talk out about the issue surrounding the Deaf community throughout my advocacy as a …. I have gone to many events surrounding the different ways in which the Deaf community needs helps. Therefore, my well-rounded knowledge of what the deaf community wants and needs, allows me to better understand the different ways I can further help this community have a
I watched Sound and Fury, a documentary that came out in 2000, centered on the complications of getting the Cochlear Implant, and how Deaf and hearing communities can differ upon the topic. Particularly within one family, brothers along with their wives and parents have a tough time deciding if their Deaf children should undergo such a procedure. They all travel to visit families that are hearing with children who aren’t learning ASL because they have the implant. They visit a Deaf family whose 10-year daughter is the only person in the family to get the implant. They also visit schools focusing on speech to help Deaf children who wear hearing aids and/or got the Cochlear Implant, and visit a Deaf community with a school focused on ASL.