Teenage Criminals Teenage criminals should be tried as an adult after they do an illegal event, or they take someone's life. When teenage criminals commit a crime, they should not be tried as a juvenile, but they should be tried as adults. (Need to put in hints at supporting detail). (Transition to 1st paragraph) Teenage criminals should be tried as adults when they commit a crime. When a kid commits a crime, they should be tried as an adult because they have either done something illegal, or they have taken someone's life.
A juvenile judge decides to waive juvenile to adult court under judicial waiver provisions, a prosecutor decides under prosecutorial waiver, and a legislature decides under legislative waiver. The offender’s age and the offense committed have usually been the criteria to determine who is eligible to be waived to adult court. These restrictions depend on state law. Some states allow only older juvenile offenders (14, 15, 16; 17 years old) to be waived to adult court, while some allow any juvenile regardless of age to be waived. Some states allow only offenders who have committed violet offenses to be waived to adult court, while other states allow juveniles who have committed property and drug offenses to be eligible for such waiver.
Juvenile delinquency also known as ‘juvenile offending’ is participation in illegal behavior by any minors. Many people use the term juvenile delinquency to include anything a young person does that is against society approval, legal or illegal. Youthful offenders are young people, in between the ages of seven to seventeen, who commit offenses for which , if they were adult they could be tried in a criminal court. Status offenders are young people who commit specific acts that prohibited by the juvenile code, such as running away from home, truancy or sexual promiscuity. Status offenses are not considered criminal when commit by an adult.
She says that teens only care about their own point of view on things. Sarah understands the teenage brain and knows that their brains are to undeveloped to make adult decisions or being consider an adults in jail terms. Young kids are being put in adult jail with many emotions running through their body and them being a young age in that type of environment spending life will change their perspective on life and scar them for life. Sarah is educating us on the teenage brain to show us that teenagers make dumb and unthought of decisions and should be treated as a kid and be put in juvenile prison instead of adult prison. One victim that has been charged as an adult is 11 year old Nathaniel Abraham.
Due to this amendment in the constitution the adult criminal can get relief before they are proved guilty. The judges in the criminal justice are neutral compared to any other staff and they look for witnesses or evidence before punishing the accused. There are instances where law enforcement officers may take advantage of their positional power to harass the people in the
We have a serious problem, many juveniles, who have committed crimes, such as robbery, murder etc. The thing is that we don't treat them as adults until they got into troubles. What would the world even think about the government's decision of treating juveniles as adults only when they commit crimes? As the article
These populations are up to the age of 18 years old. They go through a juvenile court and processed to a juvenile detention center or prison. Sometimes the young offenders are tried as adults when they have failed the rehabilitation program(s). Some of these crimes could be murder, manslaughter, arm robbery, rape, or aggravated assault. When this happens the youth will be incarcerated in juvenile prison instead of Adult prison.
Juveniles should be tried as adults due to being aware of their crimes and having an intention to kill, however, brain development and maturity can play a role into the reason why teens kill. With being tried as an adult juveniles should be granted the opportunity of freedom pending on their rehabilitation status and if requirements are not met, convicts will have to complete the remainder of their sentence. People have long argued that juveniles who commit a murder should not be tried as an adult due the juvenile not being aware of their crime. Awareness, as defined by the Webster Dictionary, is “the knowledge and understanding that something is happening or exists”. Having the perception to comprehend the occurrence of an event is not a dumbfounded characteristic.
Life Over the years minors are being sentenced as adults and sent to adult prisons, however they should be juveniles should be tried as adults because they committed adult like crimes and they need to be punished for it and spend the rest of their life behind bars just as the saying goes “you commit the crime now you do the time. Minors should be charged as adults based on the crime they commit.minors should not be tried as adults because of their size and will not fit in with adult inmates.if a minor takes another person 's life they owe that person family their life.minors should go to adult prisons so it can sink in there little brains what they have done.minors who take a life should be
In our society, crimes are being committed not only by adults but by juveniles as well. By law as soon as a person turns 18 they are considered to be an adult. So what if an adult and a juvenile were to commit the same crime yet were sentenced differently simply based on the fact that one is a child and one is an adult? Juveniles are committing violent crimes just as adults and should be given the equal treatment and sentencing as adults receive. Juveniles aren’t completely ignorant as everyone seems to think.
Many think otherwise, but in reality and fairness, anyone, especially with proven murder should certainly be tried as an adult. The quote “if you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime” plays a decent role in this specific case. It’s simple, if you can’t bare being confined in prison, don’t do the causing action. Additionally, the fact stated “If juvenile
Kids ranging from 8-15 years are tried as a juvenile and to transfer the case into adult court, they would fill out an application to do so. Kids committing crimes such as armed robbery, rape, or even murder should be tried as an adult. This type of allegation will not go unseen just because he/she is a child. Even though these criminals are children, they will not or should not be exempt from the law or juvenile justice system. If the child committed a crime that can be tried as an adult, such as murder, should be punishable by law.
People 's views play a big role in juvenile justice though, a lot of people are for juveniles being tried as adults. They believe that youths should be treated as adults and should suffer the same consequences as adults also. They believe that youths are well aware of what they are doing at the time the crime is committed and that if they are old enough to commit the crime then they are old enough to do the time. In the same aspect, there are a lot of people who believe
This quote talks about the number one way court systems chose to handle delinquents, which one can use to describe the juvenile court system and its punishments. One can also correlate this quote with the other one above, which talks about how juvenile systems work primarily with the idea of family. This quote enables one to prove that jail time only makes a child more likely to turn to criminal activities. Thus, allowing for one to prove a rebuttal wrong in saying prison teaches a child a lesson, which needs to learned and corrected. When in reality, adult prisons teach a child how to commit more crimes by turning their backs against the court systems.
By the late 1960s, there became a growing concern that juveniles involved in the court-based status-offense system, were not getting their best interests met (Shubik & Kendall, 2007). This can be seen in the growing number of court-involved status offenders who were being detained and placed outside of their homes for noncriminal behavior (Shubik & Kendall, 2007). Following multiple studies and research, the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice recommended that the juvenile court be the agency of last resort and that community-based organizations, not penal institutions, should be responsible for these youths (Shubik & Kendall, 2007; Farrington,