In early modern England there were many laws created to cripple the common man keep order and discipline. It was the elite who governed and enforced these laws, and it is this that More seems to have a problem with. However, More felt that not only were laws good for the people, but also necessary. Sir Thomas More thought that in England there were way too many laws that were written in a way that the common man could not understand. I can see how not understanding a law or even knew of its existence, but being tried and punished for breaking said law could be problematic. So, who could advise the King that these laws need to be changed for the good of the common man when his ear was given to those who profited from the common man not understanding the laws. …show more content…
Yet this society is the dream of one man and therefore in itself a flawed concept. Maybe man (women included) are unable to achieve this feat of a perfect “ideal” society. I think that Thomas More made some very valid points in Utopia, with how people are elected in to office, but I disagreed with how long the Prince was able to main his position. I really like how in Utopia the punishments were less severe than in England, but still had issues with the length of the punishment, which was unknown, and the fact that the convict was mutualized by having their ear cropped. I like that Thomas More also addressed the enclosure and private property, these are truly unrealistic ideas but never the less they still intrigued me. I think that More was demonstrating that people would find these ideas harsh and faulty because we tend to pride ourselves on the things we have as if they were some type of a trophy for accomplishing life. Life is not a game that you can win in, it is however, your chance to give back to the world and help your fellow
This meant that the king’s advisors would
In his letter, King defines a just law in his own words. According
Also, how would they get a job to provide for their family without hands? Another example is paragraph 4 of document B. It states, “ … If the rulers do not esteem my words, … If he destroys the law then I have given you, … may the great gods of heaven and earth … inflict a curse … upon his family, his land, his warriors, and his troops.” This is basically saying that if the upcoming king does not agree with some of the laws, that he can’t change them, even if he thinks it’s unfair to his subjects. The next King should be able to tweak the laws a little if he disagrees. Some people may claim that that Kings’ can do whatever they want but, Kings’ should do what is best for the citizens, and punishing them harder than necessary is not going to benefit their kingdom.
In this case, King believes that laws
In the letter from a Birmingham jail, King states that there are two types of laws – just and unjust law. He states that one has moral responsibility to obey just law and conversely, he also states that one has moral responsibility to disobey unjust law.
If a rule is violated the offender needs to be punished, part of a superior nation (Britain) or not. Common Sense by Thomas Paine states that “the law ought to be king” (¶8 Common Sense) and the Declaration of Independence states that “He has as refused to Assent to Laws, the wholesome and necessary for the public good. (¶3 Declaration of Independence). They both agree that everybody should abide to the law including the king. Law should be the kind and a system of a monarchy/tyranny is not acceptable.
Each king’s different approach to obtaining the obedience of their subjects (one of the qualities of kingship in Trew Law)
Now days, we call a utopia a “Perfect World.” More was not only famous for his writing of Utopia. He was King Henry VIII’s main aid and a strong defender of the Catholic Church. When King VIII began to restrain himself from the Pope, More wasn’t happy. He decided he should resign rather than betray his faith.
In the third page of his letter King, expresses his understanding on his and his companies willingness to break laws. It is explained that only the “unjust” laws are to be broken and, "An unjust law is no law at all." By relating to, and showing his understanding of the concerns of his opposers, King makes his letter
More has a strong belief in keeping things undisturbed all for
King makes the point that a law is just if it follows the Law of God and Unjust if it doesn’t. King goes on further to explain a just law is a law that a “power majority group” wants a minority group to follow and is willing to follow the same law itself. On the other end of the spectrum an unjust law would be if the Majority group isn’t willing to follow the same law they are requiring a minority group to follow. With all of Kings bashing of laws in the letter King takes a step back to clarify that he doesn’t want everyone to go out and break the law, he says this would lead to anarchy. He also says “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty.”
He says, “I do none harm, I say none harm, I think none harm. And if this be not enough to keep a man alive, in good faith I long not to live”. Sir Thomas More would risk his own life rather than compromise his principles, and he trusts that God will reward him for his faithfulness. Sir Thomas more upholds his morality and faith in God, choosing not to stray from his own
Sir Thomas More is an perfect unique author as he has a very different style of writing. As a social philosopher he did not just do it too gain more stature and wealth but too actually help the public. Sir Thomas More is one of the few people who would believe in something and not change he's mind even when the King gave
King distinguishes between just and unjust laws by explaining the difference between them; he explains the moral affect each one has, the unfair way the majority used unjust laws, and the reason breaking unjust laws is okay. Now then, King uses morality to help explain the difference between just and unjust laws. King says “A just law is a man-made law that squares with the moral law or the law of God.” (356) He goes on to say “Unjust…….
Thomas More’s Utopia begins with a brief description from More’s perspective on what was particularly going on in England at that time under the reign of Henry VIII the “unconquered King of England” (p. 8). The main idea and main theme of the story begins when More meets Raphael, an explorer who has traveled to many different areas around the world. More and Raphael then strike up a conversation which leads Raphael to land on a very specific topic about an island he traveled to, Utopia. During their conversation, Raphael explains his views on different areas around the world including England where he believes has many faults in the way they govern their citizens.