“Is what you want? A miserable little bourgeois republic? In the name of the great Soviet republic of labour we declare war to the death on such a government!” (Bukharin, 1917) . The Russians were fed up of being poorly treated by their own country, so they decided to take a stance. By doing this, they overthrown the poorly run government as the Russian people were in favour of a new system that would work in their favour. The Russian Revolution was triggered by the social, political and economic problems, that combined caused the Russian people to rebel. This Revolution was triggered by the poverty of the Russian people, the loss from the wars, the sneakiness of Rasputin and the failure of the Tsar, Nicholas II. The social causes of the Russian Revolution arose from centuries of oppression towards the lower classes. The lower class had to deal with horrifying living standards and food shortages due to famine and World War 1. While rural agricultural peasants had been liberated from serfdom in 1861, they still resented paying redemption payments to the state and demanded communal tender of the land they worked. Increasing peasant troubles and sometimes full revolt occurred, with the goal of securing ownership of their land. Russia consisted mainly of poor farming peasants, with 1.5% of the population owning 25% of the land ( …show more content…
The failures of the wars Russia took part in damaged their economy even more than it already was. The extreme poverty of the Russian people and the overpopulation of the major cities making living condition dreadful. These factors put struggles on the Russian people and it made them very anger at the government. The Tsar, Nicholas II failures to lead the country properly and the consent bad decisions that was made caused outrage with the Russian people. All of these factors are the reason why the Russian Revolution in February 1917
The intense economic relationship between the peasants and the Tsar created tension that led to the revolution. In document 3 it states, “…By world war 1, Russia still had the lowest industrial output of any major European power”. This is significant because it suggests that Russia's economy was not as developed or modernized as other European countries. At the time period, industrialization was a key factor in the economy. “Men soon joined them, and on the following day almost every industry, shop and business had stopped functioning - the entire populace went on strike”(document
Question: Evaluate the rule of Stalin in the Soviet Union, taking into consideration the changes made and the methods used. Russia’s turbulent start in the 20th century was characterized by their involvement in the first world war, being the critical factor in the Bolsheviks seize for power in the October Revolution in 1917. Vladimir Lenin rose into power and lead Russia toward a communist nation with extreme centralization and doctrinaire socialism but the Kronstadt Rebellion of March 1921 forced Vladimir Lenin to begin the New Economic Party in order to stay in power. The policy allowed private ownership and management of agriculture, trade, and small businesses. However, upon Lenin’s death in 1924, rose Joseph Stalin as the leader of
The Revolution was caused primarily by the political and economic issues. The colonist classes were tired of interference of British Empire in the policies of economic and trading through acts created by Parliament. Also, the Revolution took place because of geography, mercantilism, colonist’s rights being denied, and the French-Indian war.
In the early 1900’s the Russian people had become angry at the way the Russian monarchy (Tsar Nicholas II) had handled foreign affairs and how he was treating his people unfairly. They had many protests, one in 1905 and two in 1917. The revolution in 1905 overthrow the absolute monarchy and put in a provisional government. No one really listened to the provisional government, so they overthrew it again in 1917. These revolutions and acts of disobedience led to many unnecessary deaths of innocent people.
Karl Liebknecht once said, “The Russian revolution was to an unprecedented degree the cause of the proletariat of the whole world becoming more revolutionary.” The revolution was a result of tension and disaffection for the Russian people. The Russian revolution was accountable with how Russia withdrew WW1 because of the destruction it brought forth to the Russian economy. The Russian revolution was caused by hard labor, unprepared leaders, and how Russia was industrially behind.
America was industrializing in the late eighteenth century, which was a movement of industry and factories, and an influx of workers going to the factories to earn money for their everyday lives, which led to many people getting new jobs and fewer people having zero money at all. To the east of America were two other big countries who were trying to industrialize as well. Japan and Russia specifically were industrializing between 1850 and 1914, which affected the industry of both countries. This included factories being converted to automated machinery, however, as a result of the industrialization, Russia was treating its workers much worse than how Japan treated theirs. An example of this is how Russia paid its workers a lot less
The result of the Russian Revolution was increased tension between the two groups. The Russian Revolution did nor affect the Canadian economy a lot, aside from creating tension between Russia and Canada because of their two clashing political
The late tsarist government was focused on industrialization and companies pushed for profits while disregarding their employees’ welfare. The government failed to coordinate the clashing interests of the state, workers, and businesses. This is shown by the frequent complaints and warnings about the mines’ conditions being ignored and regulations not being enforced. Soldiers killed unarmed workers in order to protect capital
In both scenarios, the government was contaminated. With this corruption, there were newly formed biased labor laws, and a bridging aperture between the rich and the poor. With this, and as a result of the revolutions, both countries were guided in hope to obtain an abundant amount of equality between the classes. Eventually, both of these countries would flourish in the installation of new territory redistribution strategies in order to release pressure between the gap of rich and poor. However, the newly formed Russian political structure became a comprehensive venture to become a society without classes.
Both have had workers protest to a palace, in France there was the March of Versailles to the Palace of Versailles, and in Russia there was Bloody Sunday where workers stormed the Winter Palace. They both had a cluster of riots because of the increasing price of bread. A few differences between the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution’s radical uprisings are during the French Revolution, France declared war on Austria, and Prussia joined Austria, while during the Russian Revolution, Russia had a civil war. There were more panicked uprisings during the French Revolution because of rumors and the lack of technology for
When the time came, and Lenin felt that it is suitable to take action, it can be argued that he did not look at Marx for answers, but due to his practical nature, preferred looking at the state that Russia was in, and based his actions on that. This was because Lenin felt that the world had changed since Marx’s time, primarily due to the development of
The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).
Assess the reasons for the 1905 revolution: The reasons for why the 1905 revolution can be categorised into three different factors; political, economic, and socio-cultural. The 1905 revolution was triggered by Bloody Sunday – a socio-cultural protest against the repression that ended in massacre, which provokes the argument that socio-cultural problems like repression created opportunities for revolutionary ideas to blossom under the autocracy. Furthermore, the tensions economic factors like Industrialisation caused led to Proletariat strikes. Finally, political attempts to solve problems did not resolve the rift between the people and the government.