Going Against the Standard According to Tim Walker, “Only 14% of parents say standardized testing is important in measuring school effectiveness” (Walker). A standardized test is a test that is given in a consistent or “standard” manner. Standardized tests are designed to have consistent questions, administration procedures, and scoring procedures. When a standardized test is administered, it is done so according to certain rules and specifications so that testing conditions are the same for all test takers. They often provide some type of “standard score” which can help interpret how far a child score ranges from the average student (Johnson).
Schools in America take a test each year called the standardized test, which is a tool used to measure the effectiveness of the school, the teacher, and the performance of the student. However, “standardized tests have been a part of American education since the mid- 1800s. Their use sky rocketed after 2002’s No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) mandated annual testing in all 50 states” (Standardized Tests - ProCon.org.). In addition, for years teachers have been on a schedule to cram their students with information that is a majority of the time only relevant to what is on the standardized test. Teachers push this information onto their students because the Standardized test scores are really important to the school, and it makes the school appear
There are so many results for a single test that does not even evaluate a student’s knowledge accurately. A single bad day could be disastrous to a student’s career, and a day of lucky guessing can float them by another year. Teachers are “graded” on their class’s results, so if a teacher’s class does poorly, that teacher may have an intervention coming. [PP1] Some people have even advocated for teachers’ pay and job security to be based upon the results of testing(“High-Stakes Test Definition”). Schools are given “grades” as well, and funding is based on them.
There would be absolutely no point for a student that lives a healthy lifestyle with the goal of becoming an accountant to take a P.E. class every year, it would make more sense for them to take another math related class, or a class they have an interest in. Additionally, if you don 't already have a healthy lifestyle by high school then another P.E. class probably won’t help you. If practicing the exercises taught in P.E.
In Oklahoma, four of seven standardized tests called End of Instruction tests must be passed before receiving a high school diploma. This becomes “high stakes testing”. While there is current legislation to change the Achieving Classroom Excellence Act, state legislatures want a way to ensure that students are being prepared to enter the work force or meet college entrance requirements. The format of these tests require high school students to answer the same questions in a controlled setting and select multiple choice answers. “Such tests reward quick answers to superficial questions.” (FairTest).
Standardized Tests and Final Exams: The Assessments Which May Determine a Student’s Future Intro: Excellent test scores show excellent schooling, while poor test scores show poor schooling. That has become the value of standardized tests in schools over the years (Popham, James). Additionally, those tests can write the entire future of a student, starting at the point when doing poorly on a standardized test can ruin your hope of getting into a good college. But the question is: is the stress that students build up from standardized tests truly worth it? The answer is debatable.
Out of all the developed countries, the U.S. now ranks twenty-second out of twenty-seventh of high school graduation rate. With experience and other teens opinions, for students school is taken as a competition of the highest score and how much you can remember and less about learning real life situations. Teachers do not realize students are real humans, they are more than a grade and are not made up of a textbook, they are still kids figuring out the world with so much stress around them. If we can make schools easier for kids to go to voluntarily, dropouts rates will decrease. Little things like better teachers ones that can do more than read a textbook.
Elementary Methods Course Unit 2: Integrating Literacy Summary: Over the last decade or so, starting with No Child Left Behind, there has been an emphasis on mandatory state testing in reading and mathematics. The Department of Education uses student test scores to evaluate teachers and school districts. With the focus on reading and math, other content areas such as science and social studies classes have been reduced to only a few minutes each week or have completely vanished. In some districts, science and social studies can only be taught if it is integrated into reading and language arts classes. So the question is, how do you cover your reading and science/social studies curriculum in the same class?
Higher test scores result in financial benefits for the school. The financial benefit does not eliminate the negative impact of standardized testing on students. Miner said, “Today, children are being flunked, denied access to a preferred program or school, or even refused a high school diploma on the basis of a single standardized test.” How are standardized test good for students if they give them all these negative limitations if a student doesn’t do well, if a student does terrible on a test, then will they get a chance to retake it? No, a student is only allowed to take the SAT one time, so it’s all or nothing when it comes to these tests. Now that I’ve described to you the basic arguments against standardized tests do you want students sitting in a room filling in millions of bubbles taking a test that is supposed to prove how smart you or when it really only proves how well you can take a standardized test or do you want to eliminate standardized testing and focus on truly educating our youth?
Unlike public schools who test their children on an yearly basis to find out if they are meeting a set standard, private schools do not have to be accountable for the progress of every individual student. This may be a key reason why the students who use vouchers score lower than their public school peers. The opposing side states that the vouchers provide an opportunity