When reading this story the reader is struck with all kinds of emotions such as, pity, empathy, and shock. It is clear while reading this story, the author was going to give some sort of impactful lesson given the simplicity of the first half of the story. There are many details within the story that are hidden between the lines that express the author’s message to his readers. The message given to the readers is simply to remember that every action you have, whether it is big or small, can have a huge consequence.
In Europe during the 19th century social class determined the power you had, your education level, economic status, job and so on. As a women being born in that time you were able to marry into a higher class but only if you had
…show more content…
The reader is given a clue in the beginning of the story as to what can happen at the end. When Mathilde Loisel asks to borrow the necklace Madame Forestier says “yes, of course” (Guy de Maupassant 3). She lets her borrow the necklace without hesitation at the beginning, giving the impression that regardless of her social status that particular necklace had no value. If the necklace had any kind of value she would have been hesitant about letting her borrow it and reassured her not to damage it. Brackett says, “Madame Forestier freely loans the necklace and then does not care even to examine the piece that Mathilde returns to her, suggesting its low value” (no page). When Mathilde Loisel finds out at the end of the story how much the necklace actually cost the reader isn’t exactly shocked because the reader was able to mentally prepare for it in the …show more content…
At the very end of the story when Mathilde Loisel puts her pride aside she is finally able to tell her friend the truth about the necklace and how much her and her husband paid to get it replaced. Madame Forestier is shocked and says “oh, my poor Mathilde! But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs” (Guy de Maupassant 5)! The reader is appalled by the irony that the necklace was not actually real and the price for it was not as much as they thought it would be. Brackett says, “‘The Necklace’ is framed by heavy irony, especially in its conclusion, which helps impart its observations regarding the costs of pride” (no page). Although Monsieur Loisel is also to blame for not wanting to put his pride aside and tell the truth it cost them so much more than just the money they spent to replace it. It cost them ten years of a life they didn’t have to live. It drained them not just physically but mentally as
To conclude, the one major thing I learned from the story was that we need to worry and take care of ourselves ad of our sins before judging other people 's problems and their sins. We need to simply just take care of ourselves and learn how to worry
However, she is poor so she borrows a necklace from a friend. She did this instead of wearing flowers for a cheap 15 francs. Mathilde lost the necklace and had to pay it off over the next 10 years. She did this because she wanted to fit in and no one else would be wearing cheap flowers. The theme is also shown in this story by the fact the Mathilde wanted to wear jewelry.
De Maupassant's “The Necklace” characterizes Mathilde Loisel, the main character, as a beautiful, egotistic woman who desires only wealthy apparel. He emphasizes the negative results of narcissism by blinding Mathilde with that trait
This story is full of examples on how the characters were brave and courageous. This story’s plot helped me descried what the author showed through his text. It is obvious that the author showed his audience that bravery and courage is needed throughout life. I will postulate that other people might think that the theme to this story could be, if you help others, you will receive help in return. Like I expressed in the first paragraph, bravery and courage are needed in life.
”(Maupassant 339). In the end, she has too much pride to tell the truth and in paying back the necklace, she loses everything. This is yet another one of countless examples in which the character’s selfishness left them with nothing but themselves. The title of this story is exceedingly relevant, and without digging very far you can discover the significance. The necklace evidently symbolizes everything Madame Loisel has ever wanted and everything that has ever
As for the author’s message, know how to act around certain people because you can see in the story, the wrong actions causes
Madame Loisel and her Husband spent the last ten years to pay for the lost borrowed necklace, only to be told that the necklace cost “five hundred francs.” To add to the irony to the situation Madame Loisel lost her prized possession, her beauty, “She came to know what heavy housework meant... She washed the dishes, using her dainty fingers... she carried the slops down to the street every morning and carried up the water, stopping for breath at every landing. And dressed like a woman of the people...
Originating in France, ‘The Necklace’ is a short story written by French writer Guy de Maupassant in the late nineteenth century, the period of time where literary movements realism and naturalism dominated French fiction. Maupassant played an important role in both the realist movement and the naturalist movement through his depiction of the setting as well as the character’s decision. The short story reflects upon the rigid patriarchal society during the late nineteenth century, demonstrating how the wealth of a person can lead to their generosity and greed; thus affecting their lifestyles. Through ‘The Necklace’, Maupassant aims to depict the conflicts between the upper-class and the lower class, how their inner desires vary. This essay will analyze ‘The Necklace’ and how Maupassant uses the social context, characters and literary devices in the short story to illustrate his misogynistic viewpoints towards women.
Her pride causes her to make a mistake, where she prevents from admitting she lost an expensive necklace. So, her pride makes to sacrifice, which her social standing would be lower. Author states, “Loisel looked old now; she had become the woman of impoverished households-strong and hard and rough” (page 5). Mathilde’s pride did not allow accepting the truth; she loses her greatest years of life and her dream to become wealthy. She could tell Mrs.Forestier the truth, and she would know that the necklace was an imitation.
M. Lantin turned to his late wife’s jewelry collection; he knew that it was fake jewelry but he was desperate and was in need of money. He took the jewelry to a jewelry store expecting to receive only a few francs but then he was told he was receiving thousands of francs. M. Lantin was in shock and could not believe that the entire time it was real jewelry and not fake; he became a very wealthy man and resigned from his job, eventually marrying another woman who made his wife miserable. M. Lantin’s first wife had a big impact on his life; however, his selfish actions lead to what he deserved ending up with a wife that made him miserable. M. Lantin’s first wife was a young beautiful woman who he fell deeply in love with, she was the ideal woman that any of the men would want in their life.
Madame Forester, deeply moved, took her two hands. " Oh, my poor Mathilde! But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs! . . . "
What makes people obsess over vanity? What possesses people to be jealous? The analysis of two short stories; The Necklace written by Guy de Maupassant and Unpopular Gals by Margret Atwood can both compare and contrast one another. “Short stories are tiny windows into other worlds and other minds and other dreams.” A quote from Neil Gaiman can perfectly depict the dreams that both main characters of these texts experience a dream or fantasy about vanity and other unexplainable feelings.
The narrator illustrates Mathilde’s quality of selfishness after her husband asks her how much money she would like for a dress by remarking, “She thought over it… going over her allowance... thinking also of the amount she could ask for without bringing immediate refusal” (222). This portrays Mathilde's greed because she knows she is asking for more money than she needs for a suitable dress. Later, readers discover Mathilde is careless. When she first finds out the necklace is missing, she and her husband have a conversation. Monsieur Loisel asks, “Are you sure you had it when leaving the dance…if you had lost it on the street, we'd have heard it drop.
Originating in France, ‘The Necklace’ is a short story written by French writer Guy de Maupassant in the late nineteenth century, the period where literary movements realism and naturalism dominated French fiction. Maupassant played an important role in both the realist movement and the naturalist movement through his depiction of the setting as well as the character’s decision. The short story reflects upon the rigid patriarchal society during the late nineteenth century, demonstrating how the wealth of a person can lead to their generosity and greed; thus affecting their lifestyles. Through ‘The Necklace’, Maupassant aims to depict the conflicts between the upper-class and the lower class, how their inner desires vary. This essay will analyze ‘The Necklace’ and how Maupassant uses the social context, characters and literary devices in the short story to illustrate his misogynistic viewpoints towards women.
The Necklaceis perhaps his most famous work ,which has been also called Madame Bovary in miniature. The story depicts a middle class woman, Madame Mathilde Loisel, who was obsessed with luxuries of the noblemen.. Mathilde was invited for a ball, where she borrowed a diamond necklance from Mrs Forrester, Unfortunately, she lost the necklace and worked