Swinburne's Argumentative Analysis

2520 Words11 Pages
In no other subject is error more dangerous, inquiry more difficult, or the discovery of truth more rewarding—Augustine, De Trinitate
The crown of all sciences is the metaphysics. The crown of the study of the metaphysics is the study of the supreme reality: God.
It is an examination of Swinburne’s conditional claim about the existence of triune God: if theism is valid, then the functional trinity also is valid. Reading Swinburne was interesting for several intertwined reasons.
It does not make any religious claim nor theological claim.
Christian experience of God existing in threefold form is a topic of high philosophical interest. In a broader perspective, there seems to have two extreme approaches towards the Trinity: neglecting the trinity arguing that it is self contradictory doctrine (as a result rejection) and avoiding any rational understanding of it stating that it is a mystery
…show more content…
Augustine whose treaties on Trinity are one of the noblest works in the Patristic period and St. Thomas Aquinas who develops Augustine's idea that the ‘persons’ of the Trinity are individuated by their relations. Hence this dissertation would make an analytic and comparative study of Swinburne’s concept of a Triune God based on these two great scholars of Christianity. Swinburne has been criticized by Brian Leftow, Kelly Clark, William Alston and Edward E. Feser. Philosophers like Thomas H. Mccall, William C.J.F., Jeffry E. Brower, Micheal E. Rea, David Brown, Cain James, Davis Stephen, Peter Forrest and Van Inwagen Peter provide different but complementary and alternative methods to argue for the necessary existence of a Triune God. Hence this dissertation as it progress will make a comparative and analytical study of Swinburne’s concept of Triune God in relation to the study of these scholars. Finally we conclude, highlighting the importance and future of Swinburne’s concept of Triune God in the formation of right philosophy on the
Open Document