I have based my second presentation on a TED talk. The lecturer was David Chalmers and the title of his lecture was ’How do you explain consciousness’. When I was browsing the TED homepage searching for a base for my second presentation, I was really glad to find this particular one, because when I was a little child, I have wondered about consciousness quite a lot. Naturally I was hoping for some exact explanation on consciousness, but I was not disappointed, when I did not get what I expected. In fact, I was glad that the TED talk gave me a lot to think about and I hoped that I would be able to convey the very interesting message of the talk to my classmates. In his lecture, Mr. Chalmers phrased his ideas in a very logical, structured and …show more content…
I have never presented an issue which was even remotely connected to some aspect of science, so naturally, I was a bit nervous at the beginning, and I believe, anyone listening to my presentation could have told that. However, similarly to my first presentation, as I progressed forward with my topic, most of my nervousness went away, and I started to enjoy explaining ideas about the notion of consciousness to my audience. Unfortunately, due to my initial nervousness, similarly to my first presentation at class, I have left out thoughts that might have helped my audience to understand the notion of consciousness I presented, in greater depth. I hoped that the second time I would be able to stand in front of the class without any anxiety, and would be able to give a better presentation than last time. As I have mentioned, I was a bit nervous at the beginning of my presentation, and I believe that this could be the result of the fact that I have never presented scientific ideas, and I was very nervous about whether I would be able to convey Mr. Chalmers’ ideas understandably. I believe, I was able to do so, but I am also aware that my audience’s understanding of the notion of consciousness would have benefitted from the details, which I have left out at the beginning due to my
He mainly uses various examples to prove each of his
His points are based on logical and emotional positions as well as positions from authorities.
What have I learned during the last two weeks about my emotional responses to learning? My emotional responses to learning is being affected by the fact that we have to present our practicum project to the CCF team at any time soon. I’m scared about not saying the right things, or not being able to answer questions properly, because I always have found very difficult to speak in public.
The Many Persuasive Way of Jonathan Edwards During long, tiring speeches, is everyone always focused on the deliverer? Some people stray from the message very early in the presentation, others can hold on longer. There has to be a way to capture everyone’s attention at the same time, to involve every person in the same activity. Some people may have found that technique, in fact, one man had definitely accomplished this task.
There are so many topics I believe that Richard Wright would've talked about today that it is hard to narrow down to just three. If someone told him that we would have a black president in the next century we definitely would have looked at you like you were crazy but if he were here today he would be proud of how much better we have come today. We have improved as a country today for equal rights and treatment of black people but we also still have a long way to go for we are not perfect. For example he would be very ashamed how black people are still getting killed just because of their skin color. He would also be disappointed that blacks are still getting paid less statistically less than whites considering how many jobs Richard had growing up.
Wendy Suzuki mentioned that exercising can increase the level of neurotransmitters such as dopamine, serotonin, and noradrenaline. This is one aspect where she was able to gain more credibility from other people such as students who have taken a psychology course before. However, I noticed that the speaker did not explain some scientific terms to the audience, so some of the content may seem vague to the audience unless they had some source of prior knowledge. Defining terms such as neurotransmitters will help the audience follow along better and increase the effectiveness of the persuasive process. Ultimately, the speaker’s credibility depends on the quality of the message, their reputation, and the audience’s perception of
An audience should resolutely tune in to each sentence, remove the thought inside, contemplating it, and trust it or not. Ordinarily, by really tuning in to somebody talking, it will make a greater number of inquiries than
In addition, a Greek philosopher Aristotle created concepts of persuasive communication which include the following: 1- Ethos, which is the truthfulness through personal character. In this point, a presentation research presentation strongly depends on a researcher’s capability to persuade the audience about all what he says is the honesty and what the results he declares are real. Also, Audience should decide according the results, conclusions and recommendations provided.
Nonfiction Critique: Phineas Gage: A Gruesome but True Story About Brain Science John Fleischman’s book, Phineas Gage: A Gruesome but True Story About Brain Science published by the Houghton Mifflin Company in Boston in 2002, is an intriguing retelling of the almost unbelievable event that literally changed the man named Phineas Gage. The author reconstructions for the reader the events that transpire before and after an iron spear-like object is rocketed through the head of Phineas Gage and how the man recovers, but also does not. Fleischman expertly walks along the line of scientific fact and interest and gruesome detail. He uses the fascinating story of Phineas Gage to analyze and deconstruct a very detailed and complex science surrounding the human brain, and makes the material readable and accessible to a younger age bracket. The use of scientific terms paired with simplistic explanations and occasional parenthetical definitions aid in the understanding of the difficult content at hand.
In his Ted-Talk “How to buy happiness”, Michael Norton (2011) states that happiness can be bought with money by giving it to other people. I fully agree with Norton. I received my first paycheck around Christmas last year and the first thing I bought with that money was a present for my mother. Christmas is a great example: giving and receiving gifts bonds everyone together, because it shows that we care about each other. Even helping someone you barely know is really satisfying, you did a good deed, it is good for your self-esteem.
In this week’s Ted Talk, Alison Gopnik focused on the thought process of babies. In the past, people believed that babies could not perceive another individual’s thoughts, however with the passage of time these believes have changed. To help us understand what babies could be thinking and if they acknowledge other people’s thoughts, Gopnik explained how she and one of her students tested this idea by using broccoli and crackers. The student gave 15 and 18 month-old babies two bowls, one with broccoli and the other one with crackers, and the babies showed more preference for the one with the crackers. The student, on the other hand, tasted the food from both bowls in front of the babies and acted as if she loved the broccoli and dislike the
In The Tragedy of Hamlet , by William Shakespeare, some of the most significant events are mental or psychological events that make the audience feel and have an emotional connection with the characters. Moreover, these significant events are categorized as new awakenings, discoveries, and changes in consciousness that set off a mental or psychological effect to the readers. The author, Shakespeare, gives these internal events to characters such as Ophelia, Gertrude, and Hamlet throughout the play to give the sense of excitement, suspense, and climax which associate with their external action. Ophelia is the daughter of Polonius and the sister of Laertes, who both tell her to stop seeing Hamlet. To Polonius, Ophelia is an eternal virgin who
Humans’ actions and thoughts are complex, many people spend their lives researching why people act in certain ways. In the TED Talk ‘Why we do what we do’, Tony Robbins, motivational speaker and life coach, helps people understand the reasons behind their actions in order to show how they can reach their full potential and use it to help and understand others. The rhetorical and speaking strategies used in his speech aided him in his effort to reach his audience. The ethos and pathos were very strong and bolstered his message, but his attempt at being logical did not improve the quality of his speech, and affected the extent his audience will take his message to heart.
How Simon Sinek Persuade Audiences that the Secret to Success is a Reason Why In the TED talk, How Great Leaders Inspire Action, the presenter, Simon Sinek, a “leadership expert,” claims that all great leaders and innovators have one thing in common, they all have a reason why they do what they do. He convinces the audience that his claim is correct through a relatively balanced use of the three Aristotelian appeals: pathos, logos, and ethos. He gives specific facts and examples, to show his audience how his claim has worked for history’s greatest individuals and organizations. Finally, he uses rhetorical devices such as amplification and parallelism to strengthen his argument.
When Swiss scientists electrically stimulated an epileptic patient’s brain, things turned really spooky. The patient reported a shadow person sitting behind her, copying her every move. This leads us to the knowledge that the energy on the brain has a dpside effect that can make us see delusions. This phenomena, is closely related to a psychological term: the Fundamental Attribution Error.