Is Texting Ruining Literacy? “On average, teens send 45.11 messages and receive 46.03 in one day” reports author A. Campbell (1). While many people believe texting is here to stay, there is a growing concern that texting is ruining literacy, lowering test scores, and texting is making ‘texters’ anti-social. It’s so easy for teens to text that it has become the number one way of communication. Teen’s abbreviate because it saves time. Teachers, critics and students who are limited on texting are realizing the affect it has on literacy in teens writing! PROBLEMATIC TEXTING Teachers and peers are noticing texting is becoming more evident in the classroom and becoming problematic. Texting symbols are commonly used such as ‘@, & $’ . In addition, “students are not punctuating correctly and are using lowercase letters(4).” “ Eighty two percent of twelve to fifteen year olds have a cell phone”(1). Although texting is becoming more commonly used, it's found that ‘texters’ are able to decode messages much faster than peers who are limited on texting or who don’t text as often(2). Researchers would say that texting has both pros and cons on literacy. NEGATIVE EFFECTS One other …show more content…
Texting, just as in other forms of communication, has both its positives and negative effects- not only with the people communicating but, on society as a whole. Some say it is quick and easy and therefor, a great way of relaying a fast message to someone. Others argue that the idea that texting is “quick and easy” is exactly what makes it so damaging to the language that we speak, write, and communicate in school, work, and at home. Will texting, and the special characters, word spellings and symbols that are used in texting, going to be the downfall of language as we know it in the generations to come? Only time will
Michaela Cullington, author of “Does Texting Affect Writing,” declares texting does not affect students writing. Cullington uses facts to support her overall claim, and gets many teachers’ opinions on the subject. The author did not use valuable sources, which questioned her overall purpose. Cullington used a lot of her own opinion throughout the text, but lacked supporting facts. The story has many flaws, making Cullington argument on how texting is not affecting students writing, not reliable.
Today, texting has become the most widely used communication technique for teenagers and young adults. It is written in completely informal language and it has no literature value in it. Although the critics believe texting is destroying literature value, McWhorter has another opinion in mind. McWhorter thinks that texting is another form of language that is developed by teenagers. It is the creation of a brand new language evolving from the old literature.
What’s more, she misses out on a great opportunity to argue a unique prospective on texting that has not been address before. In “TXTing: h8 or luv it,” the author informs the reader that there is a positive correlation between texting and a child’s reading and writing abilities (104). This leads to two assumption: texting increases the child’s reading and writing abilities or high reading and writing abilities increases the child’s texting skills. The first assumption is essentially weak. A lot of people would express doubt in this argument, there is not a lot of evidence supporting it, and it is not memorable.
In her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.
It showed that students do not believe textspeak is appropriate in formal writing assignments. They recognize the difference between texting friends and writing formally and know what is appropriate in each situation. This was proven true in the student samples, in which no examples of textspeak were used" (Cullington 367). In order words, Cullington's research showed that there is little effect on writing ability from texting. She collected sample essays and found no evidence of textspeak.
Cullington after summarizing her research and having said both sides of opinions about texting affecting writing, she used the results as evidence of why Cullington disagreed that texting has no effect in writing. “On the basis of my own research, experts research, and personal observations, I can confidently state that texting is not interfering with student’s use of standards written English…” (Cullington 370). As you can see she used the strategy of disagreeing but with an explanation and summarized what her discoveries were. Cullington also agreed that texting is used on an everyday basis and at every moment that is possible. To agree to this Cullington included her own personal experience as a reference that texting effectively is used anywhere at any
The use of texting has resulted in laziness and betrayal of writing on the English
In her essay “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Michaela Cullington addresses the issue of text messaging possibly causing poor communication skills and the use of textspeak, abbreviations used during text messaging such as “LOL” and “g2g,” in students’ formal writing. Cullington argues that “texting actually has a minimal effect on student writing” (pg. 367). She addresses the opposition directly, even citing credible sources. However, she also cites credible sources with better information to support her point, and even conducts an experiment of her own.
In “Does Texting Affect Writing,” essay student Michaela Cullington outlines the concerns about textspeak, and whether it hinders students formal writing abilities; she reviews her own personal research and observations, as well as expert research. Cullington is clearly preparing her readers for the topic of text messaging and textspeak in relation to formal writing by addressing the three main topics she will inquire about, “Some people believe that using… abbreviations is hindering the writing abilities of students, and others argue that texting is actually having a positive effect on writing. In fact, it seems that texting has no significant effect on student writing” (130). As Cullington reviews the conflicting stances, she analyzes each
Are our communication skills declining due to the vast internet use? Technology has given individuals the ability to do things that would otherwise be considered impossible. However, while technology has provided the ability to communicate with people halfway across the world and opened a comfortable space for teens, it is believed to have affected not just the interaction among others, but furthermore writing skills. Although technology and communication has given individuals the ability to do things that would not have been done before, writing online has had a negative impact on a person’s writing skills which can be proven through the writings of Malcolm X, Gannon, and Daum.
actually affects our brains and the way we use them. Many people would argue that technology has more cons than pros, however it’s quite the opposite. We use technology in our everyday lives and it helps us to gain more knowledge than we’ve ever been able to before. The technology we have today is one of the greatest advantages we could have. Andrea Lunsford, who wrote “Our Semi-Literate Youth?
In the article “2b or Not 2b,” David Crystal claims that texting is not killing the language, it is making it more evolve to the generation. He believes that the younger generation is able to show more creativity by using text as a source of communication. He also points out the increasing evidence that show how texting is helping rather than hindering literacy. He points out, one American study shows that less than 20 percent of the text messages that they looked at showed abbreviated forms of any kind and it was even less in Norwegian study. This just goes to show there is this whole stereotype about youngsters always using abbreviations when they are texting.
Did you know, most the accidents caused by vehicles were because of texting? The world would be a safer place if there was a law against walking in the street and using phone. There have been many injuries and fatalities in recent years because of people using their phones and walking. A law is needed because people will not change their behavior unless there is a law. Recent research shows that something must change about this epidemic.
Recent research has revealed that texting (in class, in meetings, at dinner) has become a significant problem in the United States. A recent university study found that 90% of college students surveyed admitted texting during class. Some even admitted sending messages during tests (Mockingbird5,2009). This rampant abuse has led some professors to ban phones during tests and/or during all classes. One professor informed students that if he even saw a phone during a test, the owner would receive an automatic zero, whether the phone was in use or not.
Texting is being used more fifty percent more according to the national texting industry. This means that the fifty percent more