ipl-logo

The Democratic-Republicans: Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution

158 Words1 Page

The Democratic-Republicans followed a strict interpretation of the constitution, where Federalists believed that the document was up for interpretation, and followed a loose construction. The Federalists believed that there should be a strong central government and that elected officials should not be directly influenced by the people. Essentially, they believed that the people would make poor decisions, if left to their own devices. They represented the elite and well off of society. The Democratic-Republicans thought that there should be a small central government, meaning that the power stayed with the states. They thought that the general population should have direct influence on the government and represented the common person of the

Show More
Related

  • XYZ Affair: Events Surrounding The French Revolution

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    This was significant because political power was shifted between parties, peacefully. Also, it caused further conflict between Burr and Hamilton. Each side believed that victory by the other would ruin the nation. Overall, the Federalists wanted strong federal authority to restrain the excesses of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to reduce national authority so that the people could rule more directly through state governments. 56.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Democratic-Republicans And The Federalists

    418 Words  | 2 Pages

    Based on the political debate, I’ve learned many things about the Democratic-Republicans and the Federalists. For example, the Democratic-Republicans believed that having an economy that was based upon agriculture and farming was the best way to succeed. They thought that most citizens were good, and that there should be a more state-centered government so that the people can generally rule themselves. Democratic-Republicans thought that if the constitution didn’t specify something, you can’t read between the lines and make up what you want to do. They also believed that they should help France in the war against England because in the American Revolution, France had helped them.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Political Parties Of Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hamilton and the Federals had views of a strong federal government, believed in factories; commerce, and wanted a strong trade relationship with Britain. Hamilton also wanted to increase taxes to create a navy and expand the standing federal army, believed the constitution was great because it limited the powers of the federal government, and to tax on lower class farmers. On the other side of things, Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans had a different view for America which consisted of a small local government, believe in farms; agriculture, and supported France. They also believed that there should be taxes on the wealthy and that the constitution was not the right way to go because it gave too much power to the national

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Compromises Made At The Constitutional Convention

    1185 Words  | 5 Pages

    The thought of the common people to choose on who become the new developed states president had became an unsatisfying choice in the Founding Fathers minds. The common people to them were those who had little to none education and figured that the Congress should make this significant choice. Congress at this time was broken down into bicameral parts the house of representatives and senators. The common people were furious by this opposition why should someone else choose for a president if this is a democracy and an everyday person should have more say. They want the direct vote over the government out of all things.

    Read More

  • Democratic-Republicans Vs Federalist Viewpoints

    702 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalists thought that the states should have little power, with the extra power given to the central government. The Democratic-Republicans supported having states that have nearly equal power to the main government. Nowadays, the Democratic-Republicans won out on this topic. Probably the biggest difference between them is how much power the constitution has over the government.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Federalist Party And Alexander Hamilton

    237 Words  | 1 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist party, and Thomas Jefferson and the Republican party both wanted different things. Hamilton and the Federalist party wanted a strong central government, they wanted it to be run by well educated property owners. While on the other hand, Jefferson and the Democratic Republican party wanted nearly all power to stay with the states, they wanted the farmers to run the nation. Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist group were made of merchants, bankers, and manufacturers. Nearly all of them were well educated and owned property and most of them were in New England.

    Read More

  • Hamilton Compare And Contrast Essay

    485 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Democratic-Republicans and the Federalist were the two biggest political parties in the late 1700’s and the early 1800’s. The Democratic-Republican and Federalist parties when formed when Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had conflicting views when they were elected as heads of departments by George Washington. Some of the beliefs the Democratic-Republicans had were ruled by the people, strong state government, economy based on agriculture, a strict interpretation of government, strongest ally with the French and have state banks. On the other hand, the Federalist views were, ruled by the wealthy, strong federal government, economy based around manufacturing, a loose interpretation of the government, strongest ally with the British and have a national bank. Which views do you think America is like today.

    Read More

  • Why Did The Federalists Agree To Interpret The Constitution

    287 Words  | 2 Pages

    It 's never good for a new country to fight over its very foundation. In the USA’s case the foundation was the constitution, and the disagreement was over how to interpret the document. The amendments and code of conduct are listed in the constitution so this dispute was for the better of the country. The Federalists believed in a loose interpretation of the constitution.

    Read More

  • Jefferson Vs Hamilton The Fears Of The Federalists

    586 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jefferson's democratic-republican party views are always contradictory to the Federalist party founded by Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson believes in small federal government and more powers to individual states, his policies are around people and they should rule the government. Jefferson always follows strict constitutional rules. Jefferson always believed the country economy will improve through the agriculture. Hamilton views are very contrasted to Jefferson's view.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Republicans Vs Federalists

    331 Words  | 2 Pages

    The two parties were the Republicans and the Federalists. The Republicans hoped government took a lesser approach to everyday life. Its individualistic perspective includes living in moderation, be tough, don’t spend more than you have to, and be honest. These lofty goals and ambitions were reasonable in the late 1700’s, early 1800’s, however, now most

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Democratic And Whig Parties

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    They wanted to create a relationship with France, focused on agriculture over commercialism, and free trade. Over time the Federalist party weakened while the Jeffersonian republicans evolved into the Democrats.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

    Read More

  • Apush Dbq Essay

    1040 Words  | 5 Pages

    One concerned foreign policy, while the other concerned the rights of citizens. Adams wanted to follow in Washington’s footsteps and not go to war with Britain, instead to be neutral for war and decrease foreign intervention. Federalists, in general, were men of wealth and position. They did not believe in democracy, rule by the people. For this reason, they strongly opposed the revolution in France.

    Read More

  • Main Differences Between Whigs Between 1828 And 1840

    322 Words  | 2 Pages

    Main differences between Jacksonian democrats and Whigs between 1828 and 1840? The Whig Party supported increased governmental involvement, especially from the federal government. They are made up of market economy supporters, Protestants and New Englanders and mostly wealthy men. They believed the president should have less power than the congress.

    Read More

  • Democrats Vs Republicans Essay

    1163 Words  | 5 Pages

    Republicans vs. Democrats When the United States of America was founded, George Washington warned against the formation of political parties. By the time the second election came around there were already two political parties, the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans. These parties eventually turned into the Republican and Democratic parties we have today. While these parties have shifted to become almost polar opposites politically, they still share some common goals.

    Read More

More about The Democratic-Republicans: Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution

Open Document