Once the fetus was checked illness or disable, it was then immediately killed. It violates the humanity and also can be seen as a discrimination of humankind. With the times pass by, there will be more and more intelligent people but the diversity of human will be deceased. Human diversity was created by the mutation of a gene, with this, everyone so to become unique and irreplaceable. Furthermore, human diversity plays a vital role in human for adapting and survival to an environment If eugenics is applied to the society, people will not be able to handle situation out of the blue.
Do you know that based on the scientific studies, 90% human cloning tuned out to be unsuccessful. Human cloning(modifying babies) is a process of producing new identical babies by altering their genomes. Some of studies show that scientists successfully cloned animals such as cows, Pigs, and sheep. For the past 3-5 years human cloning have a lot of debates and controversies between peoples. However Human cloning is dangerous for the new engineered baby and their moms, so it should be banned to prevent new disease, to constantly limit the population of dying human beings, and to stop unnecessary fees to modify babies.
About 20 years ago, born was the first cloned animal dolly and perhaps our science is now able to make a human clone. Human clones could used in a variety of ways, for example, curing infertility, functioniing spare parts for the hurted organs, and assisting medical research. However, the news that human clones are actually made has never been heard. Why the conclusion is not drawn although there have been such an large number of debates about whether the human cloning is ethical or not and the uses of technology. It is also true that the technology has some advantages, this is because human cloning technology has so many defects such as low success rates, abuse of technology, and unsolved ethical problems that human being can not afford.
In fact, the novel Frankenstein reveals the immorality of the scientific advances of creating artificial life beyond the laws of nature. The laws of nature are defined by two things, science and morality. Science is credited for a majority of our advances in health, and health care would not be where it is today without it. While science can cross the line of immorality, humans would not be able to live as long without certain advances. In Frankenstein, such advances were not up to par with what it is today.
“Yes, I expect that the DNA analysis will end with this being a human” shows that now with technology ever developing which results in new evidence appearing all the time, the Atacama Humanoid will be considered as a human rather than an extra-terrestrial being. “Now scientists at Stanford University have carried out conclusive DNA tests which have found the remains are those of a mutated human” -David McCormack published in the Daily Mail- this then shows that in fact , with the development of technology and research that Atacama Humanoid is in fact of a human race. Therefore the Atacama Humanoid is considered to be a human rather than an extra-terrestrial being. Time is what depicts the Humanoid, not so long ago is was a mystery as to what origins the Humanoid is of. However nowadays the studies show that the Humanoid is in fact a human and not an extra-terrestrial
DNA cloning can copy stem cells instead of extracting them from human embryos. These stem cells can be used to, “...produce pharmaceutical drugs, insulin, clotting factors, human growth hormone, and industrial enzymes,” and these are the similar principles to therapeutic cloning in a much more conservative way, (Encyclopedia, 2018 ). Furthermore, therapeutic stem cell research requires an excessive amount of specific eggs and funding. If this is still legal, there 's a possibility that women will be sucked into the embryo business involuntarily which will be a substandard concern for the economy. Not only does therapeutic cloning exterminate embryos, it involves extensive amounts of money, and requires an abundance of female eggs.
Even though we know that these technologies played an important role in the advancement of surgery, we still have yet to fully understand the great weapon that surgery has given to us. Modern day surgery has given us at least forty years more of life expectancy, and it has even given us cures for minute problems and diseases. Without the industrial revolution and the increase in diseases there would be no research to build us to the point that we are at today. Without modern medicine we would have an increasing amount of deadly diseases every year with the fear of death always on your mind. Often we take these simple things for granted, when in reality these are gifts from the generations before us.
The use of genetic therapy to replace the default gene or may even remove them from the germ line apparently can eradicate the illness from occurring. I always believe that being doctors, we are not playing God but we are just being used by God as the tool to help alleviate the suffering of patients. We can be very successful in some cases but we also face situations that we can do nothing about. The third meaning of ‘playing God’ is the use of our technology and science to alter life and influence human evolution. As scientist, we try to play God but altering the nature and how human nature will
The children that are granted euthanasia are seen as vulnerable and this contributes to the assumption of this process being evolution. So they state that this is only a natural form of evolution where the strong survives and the weak dies (Hunter, 2010). But some evolutionists disagree that euthanasia is just another development of evolution. They state that euthanasia is completely wrong, since it disagrees with evolution. They say that evolution has caused the development of empathy which led to the improvement of reproduction (Hunter, 2010).
The evidence for this is in text 1, “This theory implied that parental traits are combined, rather than being transmitted as separate units, which would dilute the potentially successful mutations of one individual and undermine the whole theory of natural selection.” For a long time, Gregor Mendel’s impeccable work had been suppressed. It claimed that a lot of the off-spring’s traits shown are either characteristics of the mother or father, not both. This theory of evolution was unearthed became a more reasonable proposition to both scientists and the people. My next major claim is that Mendel’s theory is also mentioned and can be verified in Text 3, written by “David Starr Jordan (1851-1931) who was a naturalist, an educator, and a very important ichthyologist. He was an early contributor to the theory of Darwinian evolution…” Text 3, “Darwinism fifty years after: The biological lesson of evolution” states that two germ cells from two different individuals divide and then combine to form another individual.