● What are the pros and cons to genetic engineering?Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering. Manipulationof genes in natural organisms, such as plants, animals, and even humans, is considered genetic engineering. This is done using a variety of different techniques like molecular cloning. ● Does selective breeding help or hinder resistance against diseases in animals/organisms?
When Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein, she created a new world of possibilities. Through her own ideas, that were expressed in her book, she created a domino effect on other people to stretch what was considered possible at the time. By having Victor create life, lead to others wanting to see how they could push boundaries. Frankenstein, you could say, was the baby step towards the future of science. Through imagination, Mary Shelley filled people with new ideas that lead to our present day science.
A GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) is where genes from the DNA of one species are extracted and artificially forced into the genes of an unrelated plant or animal. It basically means that anything that includes transferring genes which comes from bacteria, viruses, animals, insects or humans and it is also considered as a transgenic organisms. Examples of GM crops are Soybeans, GM maize, GM wheat, and Rapeseed. There is problems associated with the use of GM crops. That this process might sometimes provokes allergic reactions, or high level of toxin naturally found it, other people think it is morally wrong to move genes between different species and it won’t be a good choice of vegetarian people and people with religious beliefs.
One reason genetic engineering is good is because the world 's population is growing every day with almost 400,000 babies born each day, this calls for farms to grow the crops that can feed all of those people. In rural areas within Africa and Asia, the soil is barren. Without
Genetic illnesses have always been around without any way to prevent them. With genetic engineering, scientists would be able to remove things such as heart diseases, chances of alcoholism,
According to the author Arthur Caplan one of the possible benefits of genetic engineering is eliminating genes known to cause cancers and hereditary diseases, “This would allow us to eliminate heartily diseases (sickle anemia, type one diabetes, and so) allowing our children to live a better life” (Caplan). By being able to cut out a certain genes that are connected to cancers and hereditary would lead to lesser amount of people dying and suffering from something that they have no say over. The author Gordon Dillow argues that a possible discoveries would lead to more of a perfect population, “The results of such discoveries could benefit humans immensely, possibly eradicating genetic defects” (Dillow). With many benefits of Genetic Engineering there are still those who oppose to it.
As a society we are adapting, changing, and growing every day. Genetic modification is happening; many people are just not aware. Genetic engineering is great for society because it can cause many new advancements for the as in world with no diseases and a world without hunger. “There is a good case for exploring all ideas relevant to our current concerns, no matter where they lead” (Pinker 533). Although no one knows how far genetic enhancing and cloning could go makes it a dangerous idea, does not mean as a society that we ignore it.
Fukuyama brings up topics that can be split into two categories: risks and benefits of genetic engineering along with the affordability of genetic engineering. Considering scientists aren’t entirely sure how genes work, they bring about several ills they wouldn’t be aware of, whether they be immediate ills or ills that show up much later (Fukuyama, 678). Genetic Engineering could have horrific effects on a population which could lead to the abandoning of genetic modification, just like in the way that hydroelectricity is no longer used as much because of the potential of dam breaks or environmental effects (Fukuyama, 680). There is also a possibility that only the rich will have access to this technology, so the state would possibly have to intervene to fix this inequality (Fukuyama, 680). Fukuyama concludes his writing by posing the fact that no matter what happens with genetic engineering, genetic engineering will change the course of human history on several levels, and on levels greater than that of any human biotechnology (Fukuyama, 681).
Although in a way that it could have a positive effect, new organisms that are created by genetic engineering could cause an ecological problem. The changes of genetically engineering an animal species would make it unpredictable. The release of new species could cause the possibility of imbalance in an ecology region. An accident could happen in genetic engineer could cause a problem like virus, if released, could start an epidemic. Even worse, doing this to humans can cause problems, or
When diseases are exterminated by genetic engineering, creations of other diseases will most likely transpire. Curing all diseases would be a fantastic task and accomplishment, but we must know the consequences that may come
Finally, genetic modifying can allow people to live longer. You may think that this is good that people would live longer, but there some negative aspects to this. Life would be very boring of course, but more importantly, overpopulation would happen and humans would be in competition with one another since everything would now be limited. While some aspects of genetic engineering should appealing, they all most likely have a dark secret hiding within
Genetic engineering in humans is a recent development that gives parents the option to design their idea of a perfect baby. The idea of “perfect babies” will lead to designer babies. The term designer babies refers to using biotechnology to choose what type of baby you want. The traits that can be changed in these babies are gender, appearance, intelligence, disease, and personality. Changing these traits can cause many problems and can affect society, the family, and the baby.
Food production has been a matter that has been disputed for years now because of the things that have been added to crops. While pesticide helps keep other organisms from taking crop harvest, it has also added chemicals into the food that we consume; chemicals that should not be inside of us. Genetic engineering would allow for the natural modification of food to provide DNA genes that can be used to act as a shield against pests and diseases. With the DNA modification of crops, there would be no need to
Role: Geneticists are scientists who study genes and heredity. They research about the structure and function of genes to understand how genetic information is passed from one generation to the next. The data from their genetic research can be used in a variety of ways. In genetic engineering, geneticists use this information to improve food production and quality. Molecular geneticists use the data to study genetics at a molecular level.
Genetic engineering so far has been widely successful, and has not shown any negative effects. It may seem easy to protest gene editing without thoroughly researching it, there are unfortunate people who urgently need this gene therapy to cure or withhold the growth of a deadly disease, so genetic engineering could be the