ipl-logo

The Federalist Party: The First Political Party Led By Alexander Hamilton

531 Words3 Pages

The Federalist party was the first political party of the United States, led by Alexander Hamilton. Alongside Hamilton stood John Hay and James Madison, their focus was to create a decentralized government in attempt to manage the debt and tensions succeeding the American Revolution. The leading Federalist are well known and recognized for their support of the Constitution, many believe that the Federalist party should have opted to be identified as the “Nationalist” to better suit their form of government. The Federalist party were supported by national level men including Benjamin Franklin, they had well organized articles printed to support the plan of government the Constitution would establish, known as the Federalist Papers. The Federalist party believed the Constitution was well addressed without the Bill of Rights, they felt as if changing the Constitution after already being formally approved by several states could incite complication and misinterpretation. Three years after the ratification of the Constitution, ten amendments were approved to satisfy Anti-federalist. …show more content…

They believed the Constitution threatened their personal freedom and sovereignty of the states. They felt threatened instead of instead of protected. The Revolution War had concluded, and the American colonies had found themselves free of Britain. The Anti Federalist believed that the Constitution had comparable characteristics of the tyranny of Great Britain, which they fought so hard to remove themselves from. The Anti-federalist focused on power among the individual states and believes that common people should be able to be participants of their own

Show More
Related

  • The Similarities And Differences Between Hamilton And The Anti-Federalists

    211 Words  | 1 Pages

    Building a new government was fraught with internal challenges as the two parties of the early republic started taking shape. The two parties consisted of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists were headed up by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who supported small government and states rights, this was very different than that of the federalists, which Alexander Hamilton and John Adams supported. The Anti-Federalists, soon to be known as the Democratic-Republicans, did not like the idea of favoring any position that affected the freedom of the people and the state's ability to operate in ways to support individual freedom. They seen the world through the eyes of the working man, opposed to too much governmental power.

    Read More

  • Note On Speeches Debating The Consitution From The NY Ratification Convention

    846 Words  | 4 Pages

    Overall, the British government was a tyrannical rule in which the ruling and decisions were all up to one person, King George III. Since the United States had previously already had to go through a terrifying event that was the British government, the Anti Federalists wanted to learn from their mistakes and avoid a government that would possess unmanageable power which would lead to corruption within the system and oppression for the people under the rule. Secondly, the Anti Federalists had also debated that there was a lacking of a Bill of Rights, which would protect the freedom of the people and make sure that the government would not overstep boundaries. With the current path that the Constitution was following the Anti Federalists feared the downfall of the United States, with all three of the branches of the new central government threatening all of the beliefs and ideals that the Anti Federalists had followed. Not only was there a lacking of power and representation for the people in the state there was also a lack of representation in the Central government for the people in order to speak out against the ratification of the constitution.

    Read More

  • Hamilton Vs. The Anti-Federalists

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    On September 17, 1787, The Philadelphia Convention emitted their own new constitution to the states for ratification. Instead, The Federalist profoundly accepted the Constitution for several reasons, which included that this new constitution allowed for higher and further central government, that was formerly undermined under the Articles of Confederation. In the other hand, The Anti-Federalist, did not want a authoritative and dominant central government, but instead, powerful state governments; in response to the new constitution, many of the Anti-Federalists began writing different essays and creating pamphlets as a means of arguing against it. In retaliation to the Anti-Federalists experiment at earning states to not rarify the Constitution, many federalists advanced a group of essays known as the Federalist Papers, which argued for the ratification of the new law system.

    Read More

  • Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Democrats And The Anti-Federalists

    183 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalists were essentially the founding party (the original alternative were the anti-Federalists). They

    Read More

  • A Strong National Government Dbq

    295 Words  | 2 Pages

    that having a strong national government would be ideal to protect those areas (Federalist Party).Hamilton strongly believed in this concept and fought for a strong national government that would make the country, as a whole, stronger than if the individual states had all the power. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were the leaders of the Democratic-Republican party. They believed that the states should stay independent because they did not want to go back into a government they had when they were ruled by the British. The Articles of Confederation was the first “Constitution”. While the Articles of Confederation were in effect, all the “states were independent and they remained sovereign” (Articles of Confederation).

    Read More

  • What Led To The Formation Of The Anti-Federalist Groups

    799 Words  | 4 Pages

    In early 1787, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and other nationalist leaders decided to improve and create a perfect union. The Constitution was then created, and the people who supported it were called the Federalists. Led by Alexander Hamilton, the Federalist group supported the Constitution, but as soon as they introduced it to all the states, not all the people agreed and supported to what it said, and that is why the Anti-Federalist group was created. Anti-Federalist were the people who were against the Constitution and believed that it didn’t give enough rights to the individual citizens. They were constantly trying to add in The Bill of Rights to the Constitution of the United States, which they successfully did

    Read More

  • Federalist Party Assignment

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    AAS Political Science Unit 4 Assignment The Federalist Party Led by John Adams , Alexander hamilton, and john Marshall. Formed from the group that fought for a stronger Federal government before the ratification of the constitution. • Our first 2 president George Washington and John Adams were Federalists • Associated mostly with the rich and fought for industry rather than farming • Had a stronger alliance with Britain over France • Were is favor of a more central government than individual states The party split during the War of 1812.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton Federalist

    857 Words  | 4 Pages

    FEDERALIST PAPER NO. 67: “THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT The purpose of the Federalist papers was to convince the citizens of the state of New York to approve the Constitution, as the citizens of New York were worried about giving too much power to what they thought had the possibility developing into another monarchy. In Federalist Paper no. 67, the writer of the paper, Alexander Hamilton, tried to explain and defend the suggested future role of the Executive Branch, namely the position of the President of the United States of America. Hamilton wrote to defend the role of the President of the United State against false pretenses, invalidate incorrect similarities that were made of it to previous unpopular monarch roles, and to clear up the

    Read More

  • Federalist Party Formation

    722 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalist party understood that there could be only one true “sovereign” in a political system; One ultimate authoritative measure. Each individual would be forced to obey orders given to them, without being allowed the ability to appeal. At the time, this method was said to be the only effective way in creating a successful form of centralized government. The first key step in this process was to persuade the sovereign states to agree on the creation of the Articles of Confederation. Next, the document would call for (and further establish) a close alliance between/of independent states.

    Read More

  • Federalist Party History

    1893 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Federalist party was comprised of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, George Washington, Charles C. Pinckney, DeWitt Clinton and Rufus King the paramount objective set by federalist Members was a fiscally sound and nationalistic government which promoted the system of checks and balances laid out in the US Constitution for the three branches of government. The federalist Party can be perceived as elitist, and its leaders scorned democracy, widespread suffrage, and open elections, however, the acceptance of these notions didn’t escape Ramifications as they lost the support of the general population due to their favoritism of the exclusive class group. The Federalists despite their invalidation etched a lasting legacy in America politics in the form of a strong federal government with a sound financial base and they decisively shaped Supreme Court policy for another three decades through the person of Chief Justice John

    Read More

  • The Anti-Federalists

    730 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Anti-Federalist’s view of government about having a federal government where the states have more power rather than to have a central government was justified. The Anti-federalists wanted to ensure the protection of individual rights along with allowing the states to have the role of checking and balancing each other. Although their inspiration was the Articles of Confederation, their main goal was to make a few adjustments along with adding a Bill of Rights to secure the citizens’ rights for many generations to come. Federalists, people who supported the Constitution, sided with having a central government. They had the determination to have the Constitution ratified.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton Federalism

    533 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton, founder father of the Federalist Party, was a Scottish aristocrat who spent his early life in poverty, thanks to his devotion to the patriot cause he came to the attention of George Washington. His contribution to the “The Federalist” revealed him to be one of the chief political thinkers of the republic, his fiscal policies aimed always at consolidating the power at the national level; he never feared the exercise of centralized executive authority and regarded his fellow human beings with unvarnished cynicism. Like Hamilton, federalists believe on broad constructionism which mean that congress should be exercise many implied powers, allowing the government to take a greater role in shaping the economy. In 1798, the federalist

    Read More

  • Antifederalists Vs Federalists Essay

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    After the revolutionary war, America is in danger of having a new government to protect the citizens rights. Antifederalists and Federalists are people who argued over which type of government is needed. Antifederalists argued for the expansion of the National government and did not believe in it. Antifederalists verbally expressed that state government should have more power. Although the Federalists' side was stronger, it is still believed that government will try to take away Natural rights which are life, liberty, and happiness.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Anti Federalists

    403 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalists were a group of citizens including large farmers, artisans, and merchants, from urban areas. They desired a substantial central government to evaluate and assemble numerous state governments. They wanted to unite the nation as one and thought the new constitution was enough to protect individuals rights and thought the bill of rights was not necessary. Anti-Federalists were small farmers from rural areas. They worried that a strong central government would advance to monarchy, corruption, and excessive power.

    Read More

More about The Federalist Party: The First Political Party Led By Alexander Hamilton

Open Document