The moon has orbited the earth for over 4 billion years. Many scientists hold different opinions on how the moon was really formed. There are three main thoughts on how the moon was formed, these being:the giant impact theory, the co-formation theory and the capture theory. But the question still remains, how was the moon created?
The giant impact theory, Space.com thinks that the giant impact theory is probably the most valid of the three,this theory holds the idea that the as earth orbited the sun in its early days it collided with many other smaller objects (asteroids) that were travelling through space at the time, and absorbed them into its growing mass. Because of these collisions the earth grew to almost the size it is today. In an
…show more content…
The way it is thought to have worked is that the gravity in the early solar system would have bound particles together at the same time as the earth was forming.This explains why we see such a similar collection of materials in both the moon and the earth, this theory also backs the positioning of the moon itself in our solar system. All though the moon consists of many of the same components as the earth does (after looking into this I discovered some contrasting ideas about the materials both the earth and moon are made up of, one website called windows2universe stated. ‘The co-formation theory explains why the moon appears in the location it does but it does not explain the evidence that the Earth and Moon do not appear to be made of the same material.’ but the majority stated the opposite these websites included BBC.com, Space.com and NASA.gov ) this theory does not explain why the earth is so much more dense. this infact would most likely not be the case if the moon was formed under the co-formation …show more content…
this is often the cause of a moon when its mass is not formed with the mother planet or ejected from the planet. this is stated on windows2universe.org. most moons surrounding other planets are thought to be formed by the capture theory like the ones surrounding mars and neptune. because the moon has not been form like its mother planet they often do not take a spherical shape, examples of this are mars’s moons Phobos and Deimos both shaped a little like potatoes. The reason for this is because it has not gone through the same stages as the mother planet has gone through or made up from similar materials. because of our moon's spherical shape we can conclude that the the capture theory is probably the most unreliable theory of the three as from the evidence provided, that a captured moon would not be of a spherical shape and made up of different materials to the mother planet which our moon does not, according to
This goes hand in hand with Newton's Laws of motion and universal gravitation. Newton's law of universal gravitation states that a particle attracts every other particle in the universe using a gravitational force and Newton's law of motion states that every object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless compelled to change its state by the action of an external force. Newton's Laws back up Kepler's laws by explaining how the planets orbit is an ellipse with the Sun at one of the two foci or center. The force that allows this to happen to the planets are explained by Newton's law and that the gravitational force is moving the planets into rotation, as by the law of motion. These forces assisting each other can make phenomenon's occur such as tides.
American Moon Landing Conspiracy: Real or Fake? Have you ever wondered about whether or not America’s moon landings were real? I don’t think you have, but there are millions of other Americans who have thought this and are really trying to prove that America’s moon landings were all a scam! Of, course, there are opposers to this claim, because there are always opposers to every claim. I don’t think I’ve ever heard of a claim that everybody agrees with.
citizens have many theories that America did not land on the moon. These citizens have plenty of pieces of evidence to back this claim up. Theorists assume that the United States did not have the technology advanced enough to land on the moon. “It began as “a hunch, an intuition”, before turning into “a true conviction” – that the US lacked the technical prowess to make it to the moon (or, at least, to the moon and back)” (Godwin).
On page 172 of The Creation Myths of the North American Indians, Anna Rooth shows the connection between two different countries, Japan & America, and the story of a myth they both share. I always thought about how interesting it is that although countries are split far apart, the way people think and how they believe could still be the same or similar is some ways. Of course, we also have to take into consideration that due to a continental split. I am not quite sure, but if there were humans during that time, it could have been a factor in the similarities within myths.
It was a great day for America as we won the “Space Race” and got safely to the moon, but not everyone was happy. In this essay, I will be talking about why some conspiracy theorists think that the historical moon landing of 1969 was staged and why I still believe that it was in fact, real. To begin, I will be showing you some evidence theorists use to support their claim of the landing being fake. The first is that when
During the Middle Ages a Roman Astronomer named Ptolemy came up with the theory that all surrounding planets orbited around the Earth. Advancement in telescopes and technology helped Copernicus during the renaissance create a more logical and accurate theory which stated how the sun is in the middle of our universe and all planets orbited the sun. This changed the way man thought because it realized how small Earth is compared to the rest of the solar system and how we may not be
On July 20th, 1969, the Apollo 11 with astronaut Neil Armstrong and his crew, guided by thousands of NASA technicians, supposedly landed on the surface of the moon. It was certainly one of the most extraordinary events accomplished by mankind up to that date. Neil Armstrong’s first words upon stepping on the moon surface will always be remembered “ A small step for mankind, a giant leap for humanity”. Ever since then, this achievement has been a matter of discussion by several groups that either believed or disbelieved this.
Biblical Worldview Paper What is Worldview? A Worldview is how we look at the world around us. It is a person’s felicity of life and the lens where we see things. A worldview can also be described as a filter or lens from which one sees and interprets the world and all that it represents.
Apart from these, meteorites also hold the clues to the numerous processes leading to the formation of the Solar System, such as: • Condensation sequence of the solar nebula • Fractionation of refractory elements • Metal-silicate fractionation • Temperature and pressure in the solar nebula • Oxidation states of primordial matter • Chronology of the solar nebula • Accretion of the planets Meteorites derive from asteroids and,
Then, the "historic event" was sent through television to the entire world who, for the most part, believed it. But if the moon landing was a hoax, thousands of people were involved. The conspiracy theorists say that the witnesses must have been disposed of. The people who believe the moon landing really happened say that it is just common sense that so many people couldn 't have been in on such a complex plan, therefore the moon landing had to have happened.
When both gods imagined “Earth” land formed from the darkness. They thought of trees, plants, mountains and valleys, water and sky. All of which appeared from the darkness. Thus Earth was formed.
The moon revolves around the Earth, and objects fall because of gravity. At one point, during the 17th and 18th century, this new concept, and much more like it, was the talk of the town. This time period was called the scientific revolution, where philosophers and scientists questioned the views on the world resulting in unfamiliar discoveries and the creation of new ideas. Science has influenced culture, religion, and government during this time as it made its crucial impact for their different way of thinking. Science was an important factor when it comes to progress within their society as there were many new findings.
16 The capture theory states that the moon originated separately in the Milky Way and was later caught in Earth 's gravitational field. It is illogical to assume this because scientists have already proven that the moon 's composition is identical to Earth 's, which strongly supports the Sister Theory. The capture theory is less substantial because if the moon was once free floating through space before being captured by Earths gravity, then it stands to reason that the moon could break free at any point and continue to wander space. As current research supports the moon highly effects the tides of Earths oceans and the moon 's disappearance would be detrimental; considering this outcome, by default the Sister Theory is deemed stronger than the capture theory.
The brothers in the native American creation story hate each other and are son’s of the The Sky Woman. The brothers fought then killed their Grandmother and the head of the old lady became the moon. The difference between the Bible version is that God created the moon not that one of the brothers ripped a grandmother's head off and it became the moon. The eldest brother the Sun who represents the power of fire, and the younger brother became the ruler of the night so he can be with his grandmother.
“Fundamental to the conspiracy theory is our supposed inability to go to the Moon. The thought of humans traveling to the Moon was so fantastic even early science-fiction writers didn't predict it happening for centuries to come”(Villard). The rockets that made the moon landing possible were based upon the principles that were founded by Isaac Newton centuries ago, meaning that the underlying science was already there. The Saturn V rockets were more than capable of taking a man to the moon, and it was seen by thousands of eyewitnesses and media who saw the rocket blast off from the Kennedy space center in Florida (Villard). Those who claim that NASA could not reach the moon in the 1960’s discredit the hardworking engineers and scientists who paved the way for a lunar