Guest Executive Speaker 7
Mike Bacon is the Vice President of Advancement and Alumni Relations at Trinity University. He has over 25 years of experience in development and external development in specializing in the creation and implementation of strategic fundraising programs including capital campaigns, major gifts, and annual giving. He came to speak to our class to discuss what Capital Campaigns are and the importance of them. He believes when working to get major gifts for capital campaigns- there is an art and a science to making the ask you must master. However, starting a Capital Campaign can be difficult- Mr. Bacon even titled the name of his presentation, "The Good, The Bad and The Ugly". Mr. Bacon shared with the class an adequate formula he follows in order to have a successful campaign.
The first part of the formula is that your organization must be a worthy institution whose performance merits public support. This means that your organization must have some type of creditability with the public so your potential donor can see how well you are resonating with the people. Having a strong and solid understanding of your non-profit 's case for support is the second part he included in
…show more content…
Bacon also shared what can go wrong in a Capital Campaign. For example, if your case for support is not compelling, donors will be less likely to understand your need and therefore will not give to your campaign. Another failure that can happen in Capital Campaigns is when your leadership is not committed or when there are too many leadership transitions. These can be damaging for a campaign because leadership should be solid and committed to your mission and staying with your organization.Mr. Bacon also touched on not making your donor pool too shallow. This means you must make sure that you aren 't constantly getting your gifts from the same people- this will allow you to expand your horizons and develop relationships with other potential
Brooks utilizes personal emotional appeal to his audience that creates relatability to Kathy Fletcher and David Simpsons. The couple lives in a house consisting of “small bedrooms” yet they still manage to accommodate everybody that is welcomed to their home. Brooks give the idea that the couple are average, yet managed to do a tremendous task. These children refer to Kathy and David as “Momma and Dad,” showing that they represent what they didn’t have and it creates a relationship between the children and Kathy and David. The children are also “unfailingly polite” and “turn toward one another’s loves” proving that they are now part of a family and they began to rely on each other like a family does.
In his untitled gun control and gun rights cartoon, Chris Britt establishes an accusatory tone using critical irony and a macabre diction to condemn the national threat disregarded by the Republican Party for ignorantly advocating unregulated licensing of guns. Chris Britt evidently displays, in his work, a frustrated sentiment towards the American federal government, specifically addressing the Republican Party. Deliberately, Chris Britt labeled the gun store as “GOP Guns and Gore” and highlighting that the store is “Open 24-7”. Bluntly, Britt specified “GOP” (“Grand Old Party”), interchangeably corresponding to the Republican Party, to emphasize his personal disdain against their party platform. Indisputably, through irony, Chris Britt exhibits
While many deplore millionaires and billionaires awarding money to political candidates, those benefactors feel it 's necessary to support nominees who agree with their ideas and philosophies. Years ago Paul Harvey said, "I am fiercely loyal to those willing to put their money where their mouth is." Candidates running in local, congressional, senate and the presidency who agree with the wealthy donor 's theories receive large donations. In today 's environment candidates require large sums of money to impel and impress their constituency. Getting your name out to the public is imperative.
Spanning the entirety of the world, individuals find causes that they have such an investment in, they find it necessary to take a public stance in order to spread awareness for the cause. In the dynamics of society today, it is not unheard of, or even uncommon, for individuals to encounter advocates in every aspect of life. It seems as though society has become immune to the amount of activism and sponsorship seen on television, in the media, as well as on a personal encountering basis. Advocates have the ability to campaign for a multitude of behaviors, such as the conversion of others to join one’s religious community. It is understood that many individuals simply ignore the advocacy others present, and many times are not interested in transforming
“Honey, you are changing that boy’s life.” A friend of Leigh Anne’s exclaimed. Leigh Anne grinned and said, “No, he’s changing mine.” This exchange of words comes from the film trailer of an award-winning film, The Blind Side, directed by John Lee Hancock, released on November 20th, 2009. This film puts emphasis on a homeless, black teen, Michael Oher, who has had no stability or support in his life thus far.
Rhetorical Analysis of Mike Rose Emotional, ethical, and logical appeals are all methods used in writing to perused you one way or another on various topics. Mike Rose used all of these techniques in this essay, to show how student who are pushed aside, distracted, or fall behind and fail. In this essay Rose describes that students who have teachers who are unprepared, or incompetent majorly contribute to student failure. He is trying to show that many children have potential that is overlooked or sometimes even ignored, by authority.
What are the ethical boundaries of a sponsorship of a nonprofit organization and a for-profit organization? Case study 3-D presented by Patterson & Wilkins (2014, p. 70) is concerned with the University of Phoenix’s sponsorship of nonprofit organization that provide free preschool for children living in poverty. The University of Phoenix maintained a close relationship with the nonprofit organization and was heavily promoted as part of the sponsorship agreement. Many people question the ethical implications of partnerships between nonprofit and for-profit organizations, and many have particularly criticized the University of Phoenix for various reasons. Micro Issues
Past leaders such as Andrew Jackson, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Marc Antony are evidence that society does not reward morality and good character in leadership. Society is drawn to leaders that have good rhetoric, propaganda, and charismatic personalities, and society supports them despite their immorality. Society is concerned about stability more than the morality of their leaders and will support immoral leaders in times of crisis to provide stability. In history there have been multiple leaders that have used rhetoric, propaganda and charismatic personalities to gain power, despite their morals.
Rather than using the traditional charitable approach, Novogratz reinvented philanthropy by using business models to in turn reduce the dependence people living in poverty have on charity. Novogratz coined the term ‘patient capital’ which was the way she brands her investments that are a happy medium between charity and business investment. Her idea of patient capital was successful because she was able to instill independence among small business owners in underdeveloped countries. The independence allowed for these businesses to grow in scale as well as supporting the families who ran them and providing economic opportunity for the community. Each of the Acumen Fund loans mentioned in the book was a story of success, with a few setbacks here and there.
According to The Atlantic, James Reynolds created organization claiming to be charities, mostly having to do with cancer. In reality, he “spent consumer donations on cars, trips, luxury cruises, college tuition, gym memberships, jet ski outings, sporting event and concert tickets, and dating site memberships.” Reynolds took advantage of people’s hearts and got them to donate money, which was used for his own luxury. If the money is going to be used for leisure, then it might as well be for the leisure of the person who earned the money. The possibility of people donating money to someone that is not going to use it for the less fortunate deters people from wanting to donate in the first place.
All charitable givers dislike their money going toward overhead, although it is part of running any business or even household. In order for organizations to grow, expenditures have to be spent toward overhead items, such as salaries, marketing, advertising, or risk capital adventures. Limiting the organization’s ability to advertise or market appropriately, limits the social awareness of the organization and mission they are trying to fulfill. Therefore, if marketing and advertising are inadequate, then donations are going to be fewer and lower.
For instance, there have been numerous industrious students who live in harsh places, suffering from natural disasters like those in Central Area of Vietnam that they live constantly on the verge of losing equipment for studying or even their family members. If putting the situation of those aforementioned students in comparison with those in urban area, it comes as no surprise to me that the large proportion of city students achieve their goals easier than that of their rural and poor counterparts. Plus, the fact that my father comes from Quang Tri, a poor province in Vietnam, has inspired me to participate in charity events and club for monetary-shortage students nationally. The first official charity club I participated in during my junior and senior year in high school names Life Under Bridge (LUB) as a member of Public Relations, although I have joined many charity events since primary school. Also, in the last summer, my contribution to Book For You, the charity event that called for textbooks donation for poor students nationally, was recognised by having a silver star in my
In Oprah Winfrey’s Harvard Commencement Speech, like most graduation speeches aims to inspire the new graduates to enter the world with confidence and optimism. She encourages the graduates to force themselves to think the same way about failure as she does, or not see a lack of success as failure. For many, it will be the first time experiencing the real world, so she encourages all in the audience to not only redefine failure and hardship but also use their acquired knowledge for the benefit of all people. Oprah uses humor, optimism and inspiration, and life stories to help her audience understand how to define and overcome their own failures. Causing laughter twice within the first two minutes sets up a lax tone for the rest of her speech.
Marriott objective was to generate highly cost effective public relation and the March of Dimes objective was to increase overall donations for their pledge walk. This promotion reached 67 cities and become one of the most successful promotions. March Dimes received $2.5 million donations (a 40% increase). Another marketing campaign was Famous Amos Cookies and literacy volunteers of America in 1979[2]. Recent examples of CRM included Mercedes Benz donating a total percentage of 1$ million in order to help find in order to find a cure for cancer.
In accordance with Singer’s argument, after buying the necessities needed to survive, the superfluous money should be contributed to charity, in view of the fact that charitable donations are a direct reflection of one’s values and perspectives. As John F Kennedy Jr. said, “it is easy for rich people just to write a check for charity; however, showing up and spending time with those in need was harder, but more important.” JFK’s statement shows how charitable donations are a direct reflection of ones values and perspectives by pronouncing the issue of just writing a check for exhibition to the public, it needs to come from deep in the heart and soul. Some say, if a person does not donate all unnecessary money to charity, does that reflect badly