From the pages of Andrew Hodges biography, "Alan Turing: The Enigma," came my favorite movie, written by Graham Moore and directed by Morten Tyldum, starring Benedict Cumberbatch as Alan Turing, Keira Knightley as Joan Clarke, and Matthew Goode as Hugh Alexander. Debuting in 2014, The Imitation Game shines a light on the true story of British cryptanalyst Alan Turing as he finds himself recruited by Britain's Government Code and Cypher School at Bletchley Park and required to deal and work with a team comprised of the best and brightest in the British code-breaking world as they race against time to efficiently break the German Enigma codes. As the movie progresses, problems and hurdles are placed in front of the team as Turing makes his way to …show more content…
Taking The Imitation Game into consideration, it can be determined that when it comes to films my critical criteria is that I prefer movies that have been centered around a complicated plot, along with films that make logical sense, and films that are exciting and interesting to watch.
What it takes to make a good movie in my eyes all depends on the plot. A complex plot, when done correctly, makes a good movie into a great one. There is rarely a more complex plot than one based on real life. While The Imitation Game is not a full retelling of the life of Alan Turing, it is a retelling of a very interesting and pivotal part of his
But it does not really sum up the enjoyable book by Esther Forbes. Without all the details and struggle between each chapter of the novel, the movie is not as
The movie director, Gavin Hood, didn’t do a horrible job of following the book, but it didn’t include as many of the essential scenes as it needed and also changed the name of the aliens. Even though Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card is changed in the movie directed by Gavin Hood it isn’t one of the worst book to
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
However, the level of historical accuracy in the two films varies. Patton, which is a biographical war film about General George Patton during World War II, generally portrays the events and characters in a relatively accurate way. However, it does take some liberties with the timeline of certain events. On the other hand, The Imitation Game, which tells the story of Alan Turing and his work cracking the Enigma code, takes more liberties with historical facts. The film simplifies and dramatizes certain aspects of Turing's life and his relationship with his colleagues.
The war games, mind games, and the final battle were much more vivid in the movies. Special effects are powerful in any movie, but they were especially important in this movie as the scenes were so different from our experiences. The novel described the scenes, but the movie made you feel the emotions more strongly. This was really true in the final “game” when Ender realized he had just wiped out an entire
In comparing and contrasting there are many different ways to dive deeper to why text is different from a movie. If we look at the imagery, plot and the some of the characters there is similar and differences in both film and movie. In both versions of “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell and the film the most Dangerous game, Hunting and many other factors played a major role for the antagonist against the protagonist and both showed many ways of suspense and adventure that is behind each corner in one of many literature pieces written by of Richard Connell. When zoning into both The Most Dangerous Game text and The Most Dangerous Game film the details and imagery that forms the story and film are different.
Alan Turing: The Enigma is a scientific biography of one of the most brilliant minds in history. Andrew Hodges provides a detailed account of Alan’s life and shows his various contributions to history, mathematics, science etc. It also shows how instead of giving him an exceptional status he was forced to live a horrid life that ultimately led him to commit suicide. Andrew Hodges is a British mathematician, which helped him give a clear insight in Alan Turing’s life and his theories. The book opens up by describing Alan’s life in Britain and his family background.
“I think a lot of kids feel alone and slightly isolated in their own world,” said Tim Burton. In this quote it says how kids have a aura of isolation and still have an innocence that has yet to go because of believing they are the only ones alone. Tim Burton directed both, Edward Scissorhands, a drama fantasy, and Big Fish, a comedy drama. In both, they exhibit cinematic techniques to convey emotion, and the director does his job well if you feel anything while watching a movie. Tim Burton, in Edward Scissorhands and Big Fish, uses lighting, angles, and music to display the innocence of characters throughout the movies.
“The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” by Robert Louis Stevenson, depicts the same storyline, but includes many differences on how the plot evolves in the film versus in the novella. In the first scene of the film you see people crying and moving in slow motion which set’s the mood for the film for the scene. There are many differences that are exemplified in the film then in the novella. In the book Hyde acts more violent to me, whereas in the film his actions are shown as more sexually. An example of this is when in the film Hyde is raping women instead of his brutal violence that is exemplified in the book.
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
Personally, I found the book more appealing than the movie because of the specific details and description. The whole story is set during a different time period so detail is key to understanding the lifestyle. For example, the story really set forth the idea of the handicaps. It was clear
Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey is a film largely defined by a split between human visceral drives, and mechanical narrative detachment. The film appears to privilege visceral images (including the psychedelic Stargate scene in the film’s concluding segment, “Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite”) as a means of creating an enigmatic affective experience which prompts immersion in the film. Instead, Kubrick is more concerned with providing a strong visceral experience over narrative meaning, as evidenced in his assertion that the Stargate sequence’s “meaning has to be found on a sort of visceral, psychological level rather than in a specific literal interpretation When considering Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, pensive spectatorship is particularly
The novel’s point of view is Watson’s perspective, whereas the film adaptation is told in third person, making the events less involved with Watson. Because the novel is told in Watson’s
Turing himself unknown to him, created a great race to make a better and more complex artificial intelligence with this paper. The article since 1950 has been cited over 10,000 times. The way this article revolutionized has not been matched by any other paper in the computing world. Turing himself wore many hats in his life. He was mathematician, code breaker and computer scientist.
The Imitation Game The Imitation Game is a historical drama based on the life of Alan Turing. Turing was a legendary cryptanalyst, mathematician, computer scientist, logician, philosopher, and theoretical biologist. The film, begins in 1939, when British intelligence recruits the Cambridge mathematician alumnus to help a team of specialists crack Nazi communication codes, including the Enigma. At the time, the Enigma was thought to be unbreakable.