Interpersonal violence, social violence, and structural violence are three interconnected forms of violence that have profound effects on population health. These types of violence contribute to a range of physical, mental, and social health consequences, creating significant challenges for individuals and communities. This essay will explore the impact of interpersonal violence, social violence, and structural violence on population health, highlighting the importance of addressing these issues for promoting overall well-being.
Interpersonal violence involves acts of violence between individuals, such as physical or sexual assault, domestic violence, and bullying. The consequences of interpersonal violence are far-reaching and can lead to …show more content…
Policies that reduce social inequalities, such as affordable housing, income support programs, and equal access to quality education, can address the structural determinants of violence. Legislation and regulations that prioritize the safety and well-being of individuals, such as domestic violence laws, workplace harassment policies, and gun control measures, are essential in preventing and reducing violence. One aspect to consider is the economic burden imposed by violence on society. The costs associated with interpersonal violence, social violence, and structural violence are staggering. Direct costs include medical expenses for treating physical injuries, mental health services, and legal proceedings. Indirect costs encompass lost productivity, decreased workforce participation, and the strain on social welfare systems. These economic burdens divert resources that could be allocated to healthcare, education, and social programs aimed at promoting population health. By addressing violence, societies can alleviate these economic burdens and redirect resources toward prevention and interventions that support community
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Explain the relationship. Domestic violence is also damaging to the economy. Nonell (2013) explains, “Domestic Violence has cost economies and companies millions of dollars in lost time, medical care, productivity etc. In the U.S., the cost of Domestic Violence to the economy is estimated at $8.3 billion a year” (para 7).
Violence is unacceptable We are living in a turbulent world. On average, there are about 150,000 deaths every day because of diseases, old age, traffic accidents, and especially violence. The data from FBI indicates that in 2013, an estimated 1,163,146 violent crimes occurred in America, and somebody commits a hate crime every hour ("Violent Crime”). The fact that more and more gruesome murders happen shows that we are living in fear of violence, and this violence is unacceptable. FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program states that, “violent crime is composed of four offenses: murder and non-negligent manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault,” ("Violent Crime”).
The article points out, “What is violence? It’s not just when somebody, or wars, it’s everything we see in society that makes people suffer.” That is to say, the concept of violence needs to go beyond physical harm and include the mental harm and other forms of harm suffered by people. I feel that this important because some of the most damaging harm that many people suffer is not physical, but mental.
The city of Memphis is in need of a program that will reduce the amount of gang violence present within the community. The City Council is having a difficult time proposing a program without the essential expertise, that’s where I come in. The intervening variables of the program must be revealed in order to propose a program that will be both effective and beneficiary. By understanding the variables that could possibly have a positive or negative affect on a program and its participants will result in a higher probability of success.
Using violence against violence will perpetuate even more violence. During domestic violence the children see the father beat up their mother, later on when they will grow up and do the same. The violence they see is causing them to believe it is alright to do it which perpetuates more violence one later in the
Intimate Partner Violence Fatalities: Prevention and Intervention Intimate partner violence is considered the most life-threatening and distressing family issue on a societal platform (Hamilton, Jaffe, & Campbell, 2013). The term family is utilized loosely as familial depictions vary, but to be certain the family has two partners that can be diversified roles and gender. By definition intimate partner violence illustrates a pattern of behaviors that are deliberate and intended to gain power and control over another person (Hamilton, Jaffe, & Campbell, 2013). Intimate partner violence does not need to be necessarily violent actions, but can be verbal threats, isolation, neglect, and disempowering tactics. The series of behaviors and violence can hastily escalate and the probability of homicide increases in those relationship dynamics.
Throughout history, violence has played a major role in our society and has been consistent in every generation. Constantly, we are hearing about violence through the media and for some people, we are witnessing the violence firsthand. Violence can be defined as the intentional use of physical force or power, vulnerable or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a community. Violence can end up in or incorporates a high chance leading to injury, death, psychological trauma, and deprivation. There are many different reasons people commit violent acts, an example of this can be self defense or anger.
They force us to confront the discontents simmering beneath the surface of our seemingly harmonious society (Richter). Unforeseen violence not only instills fear and apprehension but also raises questions about the root causes of such acts. Is it the culmination of pent-up frustration, a cry for attention, or an expression of deep-seated anger? These incidents highlight the pressing need for introspection and a comprehensive understanding of the societal factors contributing to
There exist many difficulties in attempting to completely eliminate all violent crime as it can have various causes such as poverty, mental health issues, a troubled home life, and more (Fernandez, Pendergrass, paragraph 4). However, solutions to reduce the amount of violent crime do exist. Solutions like increasing funding to police departments, implementing focused deterrence strategies across the state, and investing in community services to help out citizens all aid in reducing the amount of violent crime, but with varying levels of effectiveness. Out of the solutions listed, investing in the community has the greatest impact due to the solution addressing the problem before the police get involved, and sometimes entirely preventing any issues in the first place. Increasing police funding seems like an obvious solution that would allow for more officers to stop violent crime.
Braziel, K., & Henricsson, U. (2007). How to reduce violence? An overview of research on effective strategies. Stockholm: National Council for Crime Prevention. National Police Chiefs' Council (2018).
2008). These consequences accompanied with the violent acts are likely to cause negative effects on the society as a whole (World Health Organization 2011). For instance, employers could experience low productivity and less output from their employees while women 's informal aid networks e.g. families and friends are probable to alter their daily duties to provide aid to victims of violence (Reeves and O 'Leary-Kelly 2007, AuCoin and Beauchamp 2007). This is in addition to the societal expenses related to delivering and maintain health care, justice-related services to people who are victimized including the costs related to the criminal justice response to the accused (Johnson and Dawson 2011). In 2009, 76% of women who experienced violence disclosed only to family, friends and their neighbours (Impact of violence against women, 2015).
Domestic Violence: Early Exposure to Violence and How Violence Affects Children and Families By: Emily Lopez Texas Woman’s University 03/06/2018 Abstract Domestic Violence is an issue that is prevalent in the United States. Domestic violence can have a tremendous impact on individuals, children and families and last a lifetime. This paper will examine two theories, social learning theory and conflict theory, and will be used to address the issue of domestic violence.
This essay will give a clear overview of the concept and theories of structural violence and how the idea can be used to encourage more attention on the fundamental cause of poverty and disease. It will as well look at how structural violence has an impact on illness and health. Furthermore, how clinician can lessen the effect of structural violence. The term violence conveys an image of physical or emotional assault on a person.
Some of those factors include, family orientation, socio-economic status, and social structures or demographics. Diem and Pizarro (2010) discussed the relationship between social structures and family homicides or familicides and how these types of homicides are brought on by demographics within the household. Diem and Pizarro (2010) additionally discussed the broadly different types of family homicide such as the murder of a parent by an offspring (parricide), the murder of offspring by parent (filicide), the murder of a sibling (siblicide) and murder of a spouse (intimate partner homicide). There are a number of theoretically known causes that lead to family homicide such as, jealousy, stress, rivalry and a disruption within the