The government should be able to pinpoint a law they find has been broken and then have the case brought to a different party. When it comes to censoring they should be able to censor sites that have childpornography. Sites that kids should not be on should then include a fee to be on them. This would make it harder for kids to be on the site, and deter them away. Other topics of censorship the government should not have control over, but rather the platform have government approved regulations, that are constitutional and legal.
Society will always differ over how we should and should not publicly post what we choose, the government also gets involved in this which takes away some of our amendment rights. The majority of people believe that by not allowing some things to be said or published, that this constitutional right is being violated. In essence, this means that government censorship would primarily attempt to stop an unintentional effect of certain speech or expression on the Internet; in other words, the government would be opposing the idea of individualism in society. Our rights get violated in everyday life and the government hinders part of it. Society should have fullness of their right and be allowed to post whatever they please to without worrying about it being removed by the
The First Amendment is the first section of the Bill of Rights and is considered the most important part of the U.S Constitution because it offers the citizens of United States the essential human freedoms of religion, freedom of speech, press, peaceful assembly and the freedom to petition the Government. The first amendment rights are not provided by the government, indeed these are the rights that people inherently possess. This amendment is not only an important amendment but also a controversial amendment in Bill of Rights. Specifically, this piece of writing explains freedom of religion and the freedom of speech below. The First Amendment of the United States was offered to the states for ratification on September
Many advocate government supervision because they believe that it will ensure National Security. Others strongly oppose this preferring to have personal privacy. Espionage has been beneficial in the past and has potential to be helpful in the future but when misused, it becomes more of a hazard. The freedom of speech also should not be sacrificed in the name of National Security. In addition, there should be limit on the kind of information the government receives and the manner in which it receives it.
Sana Zaidi MA English, Semester – III Censorship in Dystopian Novels According to Wikipedia “Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication or other information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient as determined by governments, media outlets, authorities or other such entities.” The very first line of the given definition contradicts the basic human right, The Right to Speech. However, it justifies the violation as it is read further. It is violated for the safety of the government and most probably for the protection of the citizens as well. Despite of the explanation for the existence of the censorship it is important for the citizens to have an idea of what is being censored. What is being censored?
It protects citizens of the United States from Congress supporting one religion over others and restricting an individual’s religious choice. This enforces separation of church and state. The first amendment guarantees the right for society to come together and to petition their government. It also allows society the freedom of expression, so congress cannot silence the press or person who is speaking freely. This possibly is the most important to Americans - freedom of speech.
Censorship of the internet restricts first and ninth amendment rights, but also gives a sense of security to many people. The argument against government monitoring has been used before in the past for the technology at the time. The government should be able to monitor someoneâ€™s web history and usage if it is deemed a threat. In the United States, citizens due have restriction about what they can do or say. Speech is limited in public places, government meetings, school, work, and when it can but others in danger.
Because the government has their support and permission to do so and since the United States is a democracy, the have the responsibility to monitor terror suspects and uphold the wants and safety of the American people. Freedom of speech was one of the most important amendments that the Founding Fathers included in the Bill of Rights. Americans today hold this right in the highest regards and have there have been many court decisions to uphold freedom in speech in all situations. Whether it be in journalism, like the New York Times vs. United States case, or in other landmark cases, like Gitlow vs. New York,
Censorship can be quite a debate when it comes to being needed or not needed.It is being used all around the world for various reasons. Many believe it is best for the country,while others see it as a gross violation.Censorship is needed to keep inappropriate and dangerous information from those that do not need access to the information. Children and adults both can be affected when censorship is not used.There are multiple different way both kids and adults are being influenced when not controlled information is easy to access.Inappropriate content can lower and affect the self-esteem of growing kids.There are ways that we can improve on the use of censorship.Children are more vulnerable to inappropriate content.Easy access information can disappoint children and cause stress and strain to their emotions.Advertising on the internet can cause expectations and demands of expensive materials.Many Advertising can be inappropriate and lead to the usage of more inappropriate content.”The difference between a child and a adult is that children are more vulnerable to the effects of everything from sunburn and alcohol to ideas and images...Children have the greatest preponderance of idea,opinions,values”(Sigman). More importantly the risk of a child meeting a paedophile online if not censored from the source. Censorship does have pros and cons,but the pros over throws the cons for good reasons.