You may say that sometimes animals can be too much. The problem with that is there are always places that you can put your animal that will not kill it because the shelter is overpopulated. Euthanizing an animal just because a shelter is overpopulated is not a reason. If an animal really loves you then why would you want to kill it just because you can not keep it anymore? This is not a good enough reason to kill an
Nevertheless, despite their arguments being supported by validated and reliable evidence, both authors are biased towards their viewpoints. Initially, the authors argue that the domestication of animals must be prohibited as it violates the basic rights of animals and raises moral questions. One right that animals must obtain is the right not to be property. When animals are a property they are mistreated and not protected. Despite the laws that governments such as the US and UK established towards animals, they only seem to be effective when a conflict arises between the owner and the animal.
Pet owners say that they will take care of their pets no matter what. Bilger’s argument is that people’s love for their pets has gone too far. Although Bilger is incorrect because some people use the money to help their pets, he is primarily correct because people spend their money on stuff their pets don’t need and how some pets are forced to endure more than they have to. I concede that bilger is wrong because In “The Last Meow” the Leverings were willing to spend 15,000 dollars on their cat Lady to help her. Shawn Levering said “If Lady comes through this thing alive, I won’t think about it twice.” In other words after the surgery was done and lady was alive and well he would not mind that he spent 15,000 dollars on his cat.
Arguably, the utilitarian position about the killing of animals is very counterintuitive but, there are not, to my knowledge, any convincing arguments to dismiss it. My approach will be, on the one hand, contest the idea “replaceability”. I find this idea questionable as it attributes a positive value to birth by default. On the other hand, the whole argument takes for granted some characteristics of animal mindedness, namely, an absolute lack of self-awareness or self-consciousness. However, the understanding of these aspects of animal cognition has dramatically changed in the last years, and it should be taken into
Next, wild animals could get out of control! These are wild animals, so people don’t know enough about their behavior to tell when they can get out of control and hurt someone. However, people should be allowed to keep exotic animals as pets because the habitat would be safer for them, they will get more attention, and the epic bragging rights that the owner gets. In conclusion, people should get up and go get a new exoitc animal, and live an amazing journey with your
The Last Meow Essay In Bilger’s argument of whether America spends too much on our pets or not, I agree with Bilger. I agree with him because I do believe we spend too much due to the fact that we get attached deeply. How do pet owners spend too much? Well pet owners will go out and buy their pet materialistic things. People will go and pay top dollar for very expensive medical procedures.
Woof woof ! You killed me by misleading my owner into thinking that microchipping pets is reliable and safe. In reality, microchipping is a tedious and excruciating process for any pet to go through. Animals should not have to be put through the process of microchipping like I had to. This hurts us but you keep sticking bigger needles in every time you invent a bigger and better microchip.
Bildger himself had come to a conclusion that maybe owners’ might love too much. That medical care for animals might be a bad thing that people can get the medical care for pets and that even material items for their own pets . I agree with Bildger that sometimes we can love our pets too much material with items. Though our love for our pets can provide us with the motivation to get our pet’s medical care they need. I , myself have had experience with both of these situations.
Ultimately, as by now you may now, animal cruelty is a gargantuan problem in our society today. If our society doesn 't take care of the world we live in and the animals that help it thrive and prosper, we are not going to last very long. We need to cherish the minuscule things and make sure we respect every aspect of it. Animal cruelty does not need to occur nor does it serve any purpose in creating a balanced society. This abuse and cruelty leaves its mark not only physically but emotionally, short-term, as well as long-term.
This is why my opinion is against rather than for cloning pets. Overall there are two sides to cloning your pets but I think it is wrong. Each side has their arguments that make plenty of sense and they know what they are talking about. I agree with both of them but I just think that it is stupid and that there are more cons than pros in this situation. There are good statements from both sides but I am against cloning, and stuffing your pets… that’s just
So it is hard for them to save some animals because treatment is not cheap and they have an overabundance of animals that they want to save but sometimes cannot. With more donation dollars, more and more animals will be able to be saved. Also, you may ask, “ There are a lot of other organizations that post videos about saving animals. What makes Vet Ranch different”? The difference is that some organizations that have T.V shows receive donations and the funds that they make from the show whereas Vet Ranch only gets money from donations, and without the donations would not be able to run at all.
I now considered him a member of the people I call family. Thinking about it ethically, we know that lives are precious. In the same way that people do not hesitate to put forth money to care for a child that has a condition or their grandparents that are unable to care for themselves, people take care of their pets if they are valuable enough to them as well. Sure, Milo is simply a dog and most people would not put a dog on the same footing as their kids, and in truth if it had been any other dog I would not have gone through with the procedure. But Milo is different because he has been in my life for many years and, to me, he is extremely important.
People need to start spaying and neutering their pets pets. They need to stop because it is an overpopulation of domestic pets, and if they spay and neuter them, that would help a lot. Cats and dogs produce a good number of puppies and kittens. All of those is not going to get a home. This is why we need to spay and neuter our pets.
I know I wouldn’t want something in my house that I thought would hurt me. I think that some exotic pets would get mad if someone touched them. Usually pets get touched and pet a lot. How would these exotic pets react to that? I don’t think it is safe for animals to be out of their habitats.
Countless workers and business owners in a community such as “groomers, boarding facilities, pet sitters, veterinarians and businesses which sell products for pets such as treats and toys” benefit from adopted shelter pets because the fees these pets produce provide more business for the workers and business owners (“Dollars and Sense” 8). Although no-kill shelters can sometimes create extra costs for a community, the effects of adopting from these shelters and caring for pets instead of putting them down gives back to the