When adapting pop culture into different forms of media, it is necessary to change a variety of aspects to fit individualized nuances of each medium. The transformation of The Lord of the Rings, by J.R.R.Tolkien, from a novel onto the screen is not an exception to this notion. However, Peter Jackson, the director of the popular film series, is known for staying fairly accurate to the original plot of the book. After all, when creating a film based off a novel, the director is not creating something completely his own, rather, he must stay accurate to the plot, in order to observe the wishes of the author and the expectation of his fans. While for the most part Jackson succeeds in his mission to fortify the narrative, rather than stray from …show more content…
Much of this character discrepancy stems from his contrasting reactions towards the Ring of Power, during the Two Towers. In the novel, he is portrayed as smarter than his brother and father, knowing almost immediately that he has no intention of taking the Ring. In fact, he states, “Not if I found it on the highway would I take it I said. Even if I were such a man as to desire this thing, and even though I knew not clearly what this thing was when I spoke, still I should take those words as a vow, and be held by them” (326). This statement, coupled with the fact that Faramir lets them leave Gondor directly from Henneth Annun, are strong indicators of Faramir’s personality. In both the novel and the film, Faramir puts himself at his father’s mercy, knowing that Denathor will be angry that he allowed the ringbearer to escape; however, the way it occurs in the book portrays him as more noble and much less conflicted. After all, in the Lord of the Rings series a marked trait of great leadership is a person’s willingness to give up power and do the right thing for the good of all, rather than the good of oneself. Faramir’s immediate rejection of the Ring places him in conjunction with Aragorn as a noble figure, versus in the film, where he almost ruins the plans of the
In today’s time, Tolkien would be forced to alter his writing, making it more open to breaking barriers in terms of society and the standard way whatever character would act. Although Bilbo acts against what Hobbits as a whole believe in, actions like that are rarely seen throughout the story. He would also need to show more connections between races than before, as creatures of different races meet rarely. One thing Tolkien would not find necessary to change would be the amount you can relate to the book. The situations Bilbo finds himself in are still relatable enough to keep readers interested and
Farquhar’s efforts to escape his inevitable fate for the briefest of moments, “he feels a stunning blow upon the back of the neck... then all is darkness and silence!” (Bierce 8) This represents the final fusion between the narratives. His neck has most likely broken from the fall and his body has asphyxiated, leading to death. While recounting his assumed escape, the author introduces the main character's death in a seemingly abrupt fashion, when Mr. Farquhar has actually been dead for a greater span of time.
As in third part of the story, Farquhar seems to feel in arms of his wife. He struggles to escape the problem to meet his wife and children. Furthermore his wife also represents the importance of being hopeful and connection of our hopes and struggles with the persons to whom we give importance and very important for our life. Farquhar's Wife is a devoted woman who fills in as a symbol of the solace and household security Farquhar looks for. However Farquhar's wife likewise represents the area that Farquhar rejects in setting off on his reckless mission to injure the North's campaign.
His choice to pursue the money and put his family at risk mirrors that of another character in modern literature, Gollum. Originally named smeagol, this character obtains a magic ring by killing his own brother, eventually his greed for the ring turns him into a twisted, wretched creature. This new creature earns the name gollum by the incredibly barbaric sound he makes when he clears his throat. Gollum’s greed for the ring becomes his fatal flaw, as when the ring is thrown in to a volcano to be destroyed, he jumps in after it. Aiming to recapture the ring Gollum dies in the flames (Tolkien).
Frodo shows determination by continuing on his quest while also knowing
Throughout the story, Bierce writes in a way that seems to oppose the theme he uses. Through Bierce’s telling of the story, he suggests fantasies like Farquhar’s are cowardly and will often lead to negative consequences (“An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” 163) “…he feels a stunning blow upon the back of the neck; a blinding white light blazes all about him with a sound like a shock of a cannon – then all is darkness and silence.” (Bierce) This quote, near the end of the story, is what reveals that Farquhar has been fantasizing the whole length of the story. The quote also shows that he is ultimately executed and that the fantasy was his personal distraction from the harsh reality he faces.
It is often believed that pictures speak louder than words. However, when comparing a book to a movie, this quote is totally not applicable. The purpose of creating a movie from a book is mainly to bring the characters to life and make the story more relatable. Fantasies, especially, are unrealistic and hence a movie makes the fantasy come to life. The Princess Bride was originally a book which was then filmed as a movie to recreate the story.
Have you ever watched a movie based on a book that told the exact same story? To me, for some reason, books always seem to be the better one out of the two. I feel that in novels, the author develops the story with as many details as possible, while in movies that aspect doesn’t appear in the same way. There aren’t as many details in films since it has to last for a certain amount of time, but books can last for as many pages as the author would like them to. When I read, the fascinating novel “Beowulf,” I really enjoyed how the author made me use my imagination to create a picture of the world that the characters were living in.
Man's Actions The fans of J.R.R Tolkien are well aware of his trilogy the lord of the rings, and as a reader, I always wondered about Tolkien personality, personality and such makes one's character and that is a heavy influence in their writing. From what I have read so far Tolkien's impression on me is that he is a daydreaming man that has an endless imagination, that has made his work beloved by millions around the world. I'll be going over my sources in how they discuss the influence that friends had on Tolkien’s writing and the inspiration that life events & his morals had on Lord of The Rings It's common knowledge that fans know that JRR Tolkien has served in a war, World war one to be precise and we all know how war affects most people. War is something significant in one's life one that will never go away, you see the brutal violent deaths of your close comrades, almost die in multiple occasions yourself, you know what true fear is like.
Farquhar gets captured by the Union troops and he realizes that he’s going to die from getting hanged. Meanwhile, the noose is around Farquhar neck and he starts to daydream about the possibility of noose breaking and falling into the creek. He then escapes the Union troops, and finds himself back home where his wife awaits him. As soon as he tries to embrace his wife he is forced back into reality by being hanged.
He finally gets his hands untied using his “Superhuman strength” and as he ends his struggle "The cord fell away; his arms parted and floated upward, the hands dimly seen on each side in the growing light.” This creates an image in the reader's head of his limp arms and body floating up to the surface towards the light. As Farquhar leaps toward his wife with wide arms, about to embrace her, he feels "a stunning blow upon the back of his neck" seeing a "blinding white light (blaze) all about him with a sound (...) of a cannon" then suddenly, "all is darkness and silence" (Bierce). This though, being the last sentence before the finale, it ties the whole story to and end with a final foreshadow. It helps foreshadow the events of Farquhar's final death because of the loud cannon shock, the darkness and silence, and finally the white light.
Another theme in this story is the inability to tell the difference between reality and fantasy. The most obvious instance of this is when the reader is shown at the end of the story that all of Farquhar’s escape was just his imagination. This theme is pushed to the point that even the reader is not
J.R.R. Tolkien Gage Frazier The reason I chose J.R.R. Tolkien is that after reading more into him and his background I come to like how he took his pass experiences from his past and use it to create his later works like the hobbit and an example of this is how is holds a compelling examples of bravery, loyalty, generosity, treachery, vanity and selfishness punished withal this it’s manly about learning to be unselfish in a selfish world most of all its about having maturity. Another, significant factor in this is the obstacles Tolkien had to take to become who he is and to achieve what he wanted an example of this is that both his parents died in his child hood life and then
The film of J.K Rowling's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is an uncommon critical movie in the arrangement. Like the book, this film is vital in setting up a perception for the straggling leftovers of the course of action. It is essential that the film supplements the novel however much as could sensibly be normal. Using one of the critical features of a movie; visual imagery, the film change of the fourth novel is a better than average reinforcement to the novel. The visual similarity in this film complements sentiments and reactions that we can't in any capacity, shape or form get from the book.
Books vs. Movies The constant battle between watching a movie and reading a book has lead to many disagreements. Many valid arguments can be made in favor of each as well as each having it’s own disadvantages, yet the question still remains unanswered. Books and movies have many similarities and differences when it comes to experience, development, and imagery. To begin, there are a variety of reasons that make movies not as good as books. The experience, the depth, and the imagery are the three main aspects one needs in order to understand why movies are not as good as books.