Are contemporary education system is constantly behind in terms of innovative methods of teaching. One exceedingly outdated method of teaching is to treat everyone in the classroom as if they have the equivalent skill level and learn in an identical way. This causes students to fall behind the rest of the class since they are incapable of understanding the information being taught. Therefore, I am going to discuss the solution to this problem, which is a further individualized education system in schools. My primary argument will be that If everyone remains to be treated and educated using the same procedures, viewpoints, and learning techniques. There are guaranteed to be students that remain unable to comprehend and practice the information …show more content…
This is because of everyone having subjects where their understanding is incredibly strong and subjects where they struggle to understand even the simplest of questions. This draws back into the seven different learning styles, if you prefer the physical style of learning you would have a better understanding of the sport and recreational subjects. Whereas, if you were to prefer a logical style of learning you will have a strong understanding of maths and science. And so, if a student is struggling with a question, they will find it easier to answer if they can relate towards it. For instance: A student is asked to solve the sum of 3+4, if they struggle to answer it could be because they are not a logical/written learner. Therefore, to solve the sum they make a pile of 3 toy cars and a pile of 4 toy cars, they put the piles together to find the total number of toy cars is 7. The reason they found it easier to use toy cars rather than doing the sum in their head, is because they enjoyed playing with the toy cars, so they didn’t lose interest. Therefore, a student’s result is profoundly reliant on whether they enjoy the subject as they are more likely to stay interested, intrigued and
Every student is unique and learns better from different techniques. Some students are visual learners and others are verbal learners. In most cases students prefer certain subject fields over others. For instance, I love learning about math and science but I don’t really care for social studies.
This encourages students to be narrow-minded and arrogant which totally diminishes the goal of education. Given this norm in academics, those who
Therefore, a diagnosis of the learners pre-existing knowledge is key. This will also help teachers to confront misconceptions and incorrect ideas at an early age (Littledyke
In most modern day schools in america, teachers make sure students understand and teachers help the students out if they don’t know what they're supposed to be learning. In that society, this is probably why people don’t know that
Not being able to take in knowledge, students are unable to pass through
Everyone has ineffable difficulties in their mind. When we were children, most children learned the same things at school. But, why are their lives going in different directions? Children grow up in different families that have different family values. Students not only just study in schools, but also they learn
The teachers are storing information into their student’s minds. The students are expected to memorize what they are being told and can recall when they are asked to. Student’s don’t argue or question what they are being told, they just
Differentiation, with respect to instruction, means tailoring it to meet individual needs of the students. Teachers can differentiate content, process, products, or the learning environment, the use of ongoing assessment and flexible grouping makes this a successful approach to instruction. Teachers differentiate the four classroom elements based on student readiness, interest, or learning profile. (Tomlinson 2000). Differentiated instruction can be known as an organizing framework in teaching and learning which calls for a major restructuring in the classroom and syllabus, if done in the proper way, its benefits will transgress the costs.
As a student I found that as I observed or taught my philosophy changed. I looked into other theories to see if I could build upon my existing knowledge and beliefs. Something that would assist me in the classroom and increase my ability to teach. Changes in teaching philosophy and techniques came about during day to day experience as well as with microteaching and these are brought to the forefront of my mind through the use of reflection. Reflection is at first a hard technique to grasp.
The purpose of this essay is to identify how important it is to have a diverse classroom setting. Students from all over the world enter the 21st century classrooms bringing a little bit of home with them. It is crucial that teachers are aware of what is happening and educate themselves in how to reach a student. Children are similar but different at the same time. Students learn in many different ways like for example observing, listening, demonstration, speaking and etc.
Declared in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN, 1948), education is recognized as a fundamental human right and a key component contributing to the development of societies. Yet there are many people on earth have not been able to get educated. In order to solve the problem, it is proposed that all education (including primary, secondary and higher education) should be free all over world and governments should be those funding the tuition fees. This paper critically hightlights the significances and also rebut the objection of free education. Before further analysis, the writer is going to point out some definitions and add facts and figures.
Education is a huge issue that not only affects kids and their parents, but their community as well. Schools teach young kids to become the next generation of engineers, technicians, and political leaders, working towards creating a better future for their country and their community. Teachers have the unique job of creating the future leaders of the world, and preparing them for both college and life beyond, by putting a special push towards math and science, the so-called “foundation” of our society. The hard truth is, no one can be anything they want to be. Some people are simply not cut out to be engineers, doctors, or psychologists.
These contrasting methodologies are cleverly illustrated by Stenhouse when he equates the Product Model as a “workshop” as a result of its highly structured, disciplined and industrial nature, while on the other hand, he sees the Process Model in the classroom, as a “laboratory” closer “to the world of experimentation” (Stenhouse 1975, p142). This method therefore, instils a culture of inquiry. Students are encouraged to experimentally test, question and evaluate subject matter as a means to discovering “meaning in it for himself or herself’ (Ornstein and Hunkins, 2004, p209). On the surface this approach appears to be very much supported in terms of current educational discourse and through my experience at lectures it has certainly been the approach that commands most support. However, I have noted a number of difficulties associated with this approach.
Change is occurring in society at a rapid speed. Change may be described as the adoption of an innovation (Carlopio 1998), where the ultimate goal is to improve outcomes through an alteration of practices. The above saying can truly be applied on the modern education system. The society in the twenty first century is increasingly diverse, globalized, and complex and media-saturated. In today’s world of technology, the olden education system with its teacher-centered approach, passive learning, time based, textbook driven, fragmented curriculum, low expectations from the learner does not seem to cater to the learning needs of twenty first century students.
While the students are viewed as empty vessels who receive knowledge form the teacher through teaching and direct