Financial markets have evolved over the years and now there is an array of products that is widely used by the market players, known as the Financial Derivatives which includes swaps, futures, forwards, option, etc. A derivative is nothing but a financial instrument that derives its value from an underlying asset or assets.
Prior to the financial crisis in 2008, the use of derivatives came under scrutiny because several well known companies made huge derivative related losses – Procter & Gamble lost $150 million in 1994, Barings Bank lost $1.3 billion in 2005, Long Term Capital Management Company lost $3.5 billion in 1998, the Hedge Fund Amarnath lost $6 billion in 2006,Socieite General lost euro 5 billion in 2008.
With the use of derivatives,
…show more content…
Market Risk – it is basically the risk associated with fluctuations and changes in the dynamic markets
2. Counterparty Risk or Credit Risk – it is the risk that arises if one of the parties involved in the derivative trade defaults and fails to meet the contract obligations
3. Liquidity Risk - it is the risk that arises if the investors decide to close out the contract prior to maturity
In order to avoid the risks, it becomes highly imperative that the derivatives market is properly regulated. The reasons below further strengthen the argument:
1. Warren Buffet quoted, “Derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that are potentially lethal.” Derivatives played an important role in the beginning of the Financial Crises in 2007. AIG took a risky position in derivatives and did not keep sufficient capital as a safeguard against the potential losses. Ultimately , the company’s large derivative exposure resulted in its bankruptcy and a government bailout to prevent the parties involved from taking losses, thereby causing further financial instability. After the financial crises, several reforms were introduced to strengthen the regulation of these risky products such as the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform, Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Volcker Rule, which showed that the regulation of derivatives was something that cannot be
…show more content…
As discussed in the first question, banks are a crucial part of the economy and they use largely use derivatives to hedge the risks. During Lehman Brothers meltdown, banks did not fully understand the level of losses that could incurred on derivatives trade with Lehman and others and as a result, it created great panic in the financial markets. Therefore, it is important to have clear rules regulating these risky products
3. Derivatives can be considered one of the ways to share or distribute risks. It is requires financial engineering of different products and there is no fixed contract/combination that will guarantee profits. In order to prevent the market players to take a highly risky position, it is necessary that certain rules are set for trading in derivatives.
4. Derivatives may be misused by the market speculators. Derivatives are often referred as “razors” and with increased use of derivatives, the risk of misuse also increases
Derivative market is primarily regulated by SFC and HKMA, where SFC is responsible for overlooking market misconducts and HKMA ensures stability and development of financial infrastructure. The present provisions provide an adequate framework for the regulation of derivative markets by enacting laws and regulations such as:
1. Risk Disclosure Rules
2. Prudential Supervision
3. Adoption of IOSCO Guidelines (which primarily focus on efficient risk management
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was the federal government’s reaction to the financial crisis of 2008. The Dodd-Frank act symbolized the government’s regulatory stamp on the banks in the United States . This regulation from the Dodd-Frank Act set the goal to lower dependency on the bank federally by setting up regulations and tampering with companies that are deemed “Too Big to Fail”. Before the enactment of the Dodd Frank act, it took many obstacles to produce the content provided which sparked from the issue at hand with the financial downward spiral and the decisions as well as actions from overseers such as: the Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson and the presiding president George Bush. Two men emerged
The Glass-Steagall Act of 1932 permitted the use of government securities to back Federal Reserve notes. It also separated personal and investment banking. During The Great Depression, many banks were involved in personal and investment banking. Investment banking is much riskier than personal banking so problems in the investment banking business effected the personal banking business. However, Glass-Steagall had much less impact than Hoover originally thought because it was too late.
The Securities & Exchange Commission, for example, was created to regulate wall-street, investing and the stock market in order to prevent another crash. This agency enforced laws that were previously ignored by the investors / companies, a departure from the strictly “laissez-faire” government philosophy of old. Another agency, the FDIC, was created as a response to the many failing banks of the depression. As a secure bank, the FDIC protected its users (and by extension the economy) from ruin by not making risky investments with their money. This commission reflects the government’s increased involvement in government as a result of the New Deal.
Before this act was passed, banking was not regulated which allowed banks to set interest rates to whatever they wanted and control the money supply. This led to many money panics that led to recessions and depressions. The Federal Reserve Act called for there to be regional reserve banks that would be overseen by a Federal Reserve Board that would be appointed by the government (74). The passing of Federal Reserve Act is considered a progressive action because it regulated the banking industry and prevented trusts between the individual banks
The Emergency Banking Relief Act (EBRA) stated that if a bank failed, the government guaranteed the people would get their money back. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reformed the stock market by creating rules to make it safer to invest money. The Commission became like the police to protect people and their investments. During the Depression, there was overproduction of food. , so food was cheap and the farmers did not have enough money to keep their farms.
Throughout the essay, it’s going to explain what was the Great Depression and some of the New Deal policies enacted due to the Great Depression. what were the major policy initiatives of the New Deal in the “Hundred Days.” Who were the main proponents of the economic justice in the 1930s and their measures they advocated. The major initiatives of the Second New Deal, and how did they differ from the First New Deal. As well as, how did the New Deal define the meaning of freedom in American and the benefits that women and minorities received form the New Deal.
The reader so far could gather that globalsim that globalism is a wide spread movement that began it grip on the nation predominately during the mid 20th century, but even to this very day globalism is on the offensive. Most modern day Americans are probably familiar with the Subprime Mortage crisis of ‘08 and for those who are not: in 2008 the U.S. economy’s real estate market suffered from a collapse due to Chase Bank unwarily handing out risky loans that would, realistical, be left unpaid due to people inability to require funds. Being the Federal Reserve’s job to maintain the economy the private bank is ultimately the cause of this economic crises. Before going into an explanation of the crisis one must understand that, through the words of Richard H. Timberlake (2008) “...a particular market instability can be contained only if Federal Reserve policy maintains monetary equilibrium, the principle it abandoned in 1929[The Gold Standard].” Timberlake also mentions in this text that market can, and sometimes, will return to the equilibrium.
The biggest enemy to the end of the financial crisis and the beginning of an economic recovery is Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson himself. Lets forget for a minute that the decision by Paulson and Bernanke to let Lehman Brothers fail was the precipitating event leading to credit markets freezing up and the first round of financial panic. Since then, the two have been working diligently to correct this collosal mistake. But separating actions from words, we see that words are in fact much more potent. Since the end of September, every time Henry Paulson has opened his month, the Dow has dropped on average 196 points.
The AIG Scandal 2005 started when AIG management was issuing a press release describing its third quarter earnings in 2000 to the public. The report showed that the premium of AIG was significantly increasing, while its loss reserves was decreasing by $59 million. However, according to many industry analysts, along with the positive earnings, AIG in fact should show an increase in its loss reserves as well. This caused the investors of AIG suspected that AIG was drawing down its loss reserves to boost its profits. The suspicious of the investors has unfortunately led to the falling of AIG stock price from $99.60 to $93.30 on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
The FDIC was very successful and it lasted so long because it protected bank depositors. Back then it had protected individual deposits up to $2,500 (Social Studies Textbook). This was good because it gave people faith in their banks. Another lasting change that was brought by the New Deal was the Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC for short. This was such a successful program that was included in the New Deal because it protected people investing and it protected illegal actions and unfair practices.
In addition to the New Deal programs, FDR created a new slate of reforms of the financial system for the unemployed, workers, and farmers. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation protected depositors’ accounts and allowed the Securities and Exchange Commission to regulate the stock market to prevent abuses that led them to the crash in 1929. As opposed to Ronald
Some banks blew up; others were bailed out. Either way the global credit system froze. But even if you were clever enough in 2005 to see all of this coming, you wouldn’t necessarily have been able to cash in as successfully as the characters in The Big Short. Figuring out exactly what securities to bet against - and how and when - mattered as much as the basic insight. The movie captures this well, as the characters face a crisis of confidence when foreclosures begin to rise and their big bets against mortgage-backed securities aren’t yet paying off.
Case Study 1: Banc One Corporation Asset and Liability Management Gizem Akkan So basically, the main problem Banc One Corporation has falling share prices as it is written from a 48 ¾ to 36 ¾ in April 1993. The basic reason behind this decline is that its exposure to derivative securities. This decline in share prices raises concerns among the Banc One’s Investors as well as its analysts since they are uncomfortable with huge amount of derivative usage particularly swaps. They think they are not able to measure risks they exposed so this create uncertainity about the firm’s financial stability.
The only good thing to come out of Lehman’s collapse was that the US regulators had to tighten up regulations and limit the chance of such a crisis happening again. This will bring back investors confidence in Wall Street and keep the economic wheel turning.
Insurance is the equitable transfer of risk of a loss, from one entity in exchange of money. In today’s world, it is difficult to find a person who is not fully insured. Thus, insurance is a means to manage possible risks, as no one wants to face any type of a loss. It is evident that the insurance companies are now profiting to a greater extent since everyone wants to be on a safer side and avoid risks. This has in turn helped in the economy’s development and growth.