CONCLUSION
There are lots of theories that try to explain our research question.
Some of them are based on science, others are based on assumptions, and yet there is no definite answer agreed by all researchers.
At the beginning of the work, when we chose our research topic and still didn't investigate about our research question, we didn't know much about the island, the residents, and even about the statues. The question we have chosen is considered to be a mystery to many researchers because of the size and the weight of the statues.
After a short Online Investigation, we found some articles that helped us learn more about the subject and learn the different theories. One of the theories that we have found claims the statues were placed
…show more content…
groups of people holding ropes that tide to the head of the statue, tilting it side to side while pulling it forward and in that way making the statue “walk” to his place.
We read about it in few sources, and even saw a demo video that explains how it actually worked.
After research about the Moai it made a lot of sense to us. The D shape which were carved at the base of the statue made no sense, why the carved it only at the beginning and later on, the removed it when the statues arrived to their places.
This fact convinced us that The Rope Theory is correct and the most precise theory there is to explain this.
A lot of researchers believe that this is the answer to the mystery, and so are we.
To sum up, we say that the Moai were moved by ropes, and groups of people tilting it side to side and forward in ancient roads making the statues arrive to their destinations in peace.
PERSONALS REFLECTIONS
GUY OZERI
Working on this project was very different then working on other school assignments. I’ve learned a lot from the research due to the wide search we needed to do in order to start writing about any
…show more content…
During the work and the research we did, we saw a lot of sites full of theories and information about this fascinating subject. Every researcher worked and developed his theory for years with the purpose to be the one who solve this mystery, and this is, for my opinion, what actually attracted us to this subject – the fact that there are so many theories and no one obvious answer.
I enjoyed to take part in this project and to take part in this huge research behind this subject. Without it, this mystery of the Easter Island would have stayed a mystery to me. During the work, we all, and me particularly, learned how to summarize and merge data from different source of information and take every piece of information with a grain of salt.
MAY ZEHAVI
I find this subject of the Easter Island and the Moai very interesting because of all the mysteries floating Around the "Moai"
For one the Lorax is a fictional tale rather than reality. Also, in the Lorax the Once-ler used the trees for his own economic gain rather than for a population to build resources for them to live and survive. In Easter’s End people didn’t know how to survive off resources and sustain for the future. Since the Polynesians had no wood to make tools with, they had no ways to hunt for food which led to the idea of cannibalism, that later lead to the extinction of humans on Easter Island.
Each day they were required to climb 506 steps just to begin work, although they didn’t sculpt much during the winter. The sculpture was carved into the unnamed mountain, and 450,000 tons of rock had to be removed to begin. Borglum originally planned for the presidents to be sculpted from the waist up, but after a huge sculpting disaster he was left with no other choice but to sculpt only their heads. After that his goal was to make their eyes pop out so that when the sun hit the pupil it would look like a twinkle of light.
This sculpture craves attention as is stands outside, on a concrete platform with four steps, facing each side of the detailed pedestal. This pedestal possesses quotes such as “I have a
You would imagine this amazing kingdom sitting behind the statue and there was gold encrusted everything, but there was just sand. Sand for miles and miles, with nothing but a lone, destroyed statue.
God 's existence has been a continuous debate certainly for centuries. The issue of God 's existence is debatable because of the different kind of controversies that can be raised from an "Atheist as being the non-believer of God" and a "Theist who is the believer of God". An atheist can raise different objections on the order of the universe by claiming that the science is a reason behind the perfection of the universe. In Aquinas 's fifth argument, he claims that the order of the universe cannot be explained by chance, but only by design and purpose. To explain this order of the universe he concludes that, there is an intelligent being whom we call "God".
Both pieces are sculptures in the round, meaning they are not carved into a wall; they are freestanding. Both of the kings
In the two stories “The lorax” and “Easter Island” there are lots of differences and similarities. Both stories have environmental issues dealing with trees and air quality. The environment in each story became a wasteland and was eventually polluted by trash. Once-ler in the lorax story and the Polynesians in the Easter island story tried to protect the environment but both failed to do so, all natural resources were lost and everything went downhill from there. First, in “The lorax” an environmental issue was the air quality.
In the beginning, researchers began searching for the historical aspects of the city and began looking for artifacts. Experts are supporting their interpretation largely on studies of 16th century spanish legal documents and a more detailed analysis of artifacts found in the ruins (Lost City), In addition, the
When Grinnell says that science is taught “divorced from understanding” he means that students aren’t taught what is so fascinating about science, but are rather taught how to complete science assignments. He uses the example of the science fair, which is something I, fortunately never had to do in high school. I heard through the grapevine through my friends that did have to do the science fair that it was too strict. There was no room for creativity; it seemed like the project didn’t care about the student presenting something interesting in the world of science, rather it was strictly based on, as Grinnell said, the placement of certain aspects of the project. In high school, I took a very basic biology class where the teacher understood that the curriculum was taking the fun
Many people climbed hills and cliffs to hunt birds there, but never came back. Their ropes always seemed to be cut or broken. One day a priest came to perform an exorcism and remove the evil from the island. When the priest started climbing cliffs, his ropes didn't break. He was holding a bible, so the evil couldn't kill him.
Supposedly its from the Kushan period, from Gandhara, 2nd century AD. This statue is made from grey schist stones which are basically metamorphic rocks and these rocks are made up of different mineral constituents. The most interesting fact about this statue is that during the 2nd century, this was the first time that Buddha had been portrayed in a physical form. After careful observation, I noticed that the hands and the feet looked different and on doing some research, it became clear that sometimes the hands and feet were made from marble separately in order to make the figure look more realistic and give it an additional touch. Special Greek techniques were used to do
This creates a great sense of mystery and interest: the reader is getting a story told by a poet, who heard it from a traveler who may or may not have actually seen the statue. The monument itself is an expression of the sculptor, who may or may not have captured the passions of the king. The best interpretation of the king is not the statue, but the kings own words written on the pedestal, “My name is Ozymandias, king of kings.” The author chose to convey his story through poetry to create something more powerful and enduring than anything politics could have achieved – while eventually understanding that Shelly’s words too will eventually pass, the same as Ozymandias, also known as Ramesses’ II reign and ‘lasting’ impression eventually eroded into the sands of
There is a big argument among the world discussing the issue of evolution verses creation. The evolutionists believe that everything has evolved from similar ancestors, and over time they changed into the different species we have today. Creationists believe that everything that is on the earth was put here by a higher being that put all of the complexity and variation of the animals that are here today. I believe that everything that on the earth today was created by an intelligent being because evolution is just a theory, evolution is no longer happening, and it is unscientific based on the scientific method.
It is actually just a portion of a statue. Only the legs remain of what once was a statue of a king named Ozymandias. The poem states, “Two vast and trunkless legs of stone stand in the desert” (line 2-3). This shows that the statue, which was created by people, was destroyed by the desert environment. This proves that nature won over what people created, since only