Word Frequency Effect
Abstract
Introduction
The word frequency effect a subject matter of cognitive psychology is one of the most well researched psychological phenomenon, research on this effect dates back several years, where Cattell (1886b) was one of the earliest pioneers who made empirical observations and demonstrated that the frequency of occurrence of a word in a language affects even the most basic processing of that word, its speed of recognition. People do not process “bassigkl” or “judhanjd” as quickly---or indeed in the same way--as they process “house” or “orange”. Later on, in an attempt to explain why words are read aloud faster than the corresponding objects or their properties can be named aloud, Cattell (1886a) suggested
…show more content…
The specific design of the LCA model provides an ideal framework for conceptualizing the basic mechanisms involved in making a lexical decision. The participants are provided with practice trials first and later for the main experiment, a list of words and non-words where they have to discriminate between the same. Where list of words and non-words is the same for both the participants. For the experimental group, the participants are provided with a distraction while performing the task where the words are presented at different locations in every …show more content…
References
Annie Jalbert& Ian Neath &Aimée M. Surprenant, Does length or neighborhood size cause the word length effect?Published online: 2 April 2011, CopyrightPsychonomic Society, Inc. 2011
Colin M. MacLeod and Kristina E. Kampe University of Toronto, Scarborough Campus. Word FrequencyEffects on Recall, Recognition, and Word Fragment Completion Tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Copyright 1996 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 0278-7393/96/$3.00 1996, Vol. 22, No. 1, 132-142
Ste´phaneDufau, Jonathan Grainger, and Johannes C. Ziegler Centre National de la RechercheScientifique, Marseille, France, and Aix-Marseille University. How to Say “No” to a Nonword: A Leaky Competing Accumulator Model of Lexical Decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: © 2012 American Psychological Association Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2012, Vol. 38, No. 4,
Word Identification The QRI-4 guideline suggested Tessa begin reading the word lists at the upper middle grade level, two levels below her current grade level. However, it was necessary to test back to the fifth grade level due to Tessa’s performance on the suggested starting point. Tessa completed the fifth grade word list automatically with 90% accuracy, in the allotted time, signifying she read the words at the independent level. When analyzing the sixth grade word list, Tessa automatically identified 70% of the words, indicating she was identifying words at the instructional level.
This impacts his need for order that led him to start generating the list of word. After reading the
I very rarely think in words at all. A thought prevails and I may try to express it in words afterwards, but the words are never there to begin with. But sometimes if I’m lucky, I can identify the thought bubble almost instantaneously with what I like to call “special transmitters”. You see, each thought shape has a different feel – sometimes the thoughts are quiet as a mouse, and sometimes it is loud and thunderous. Sometimes it sounds like it is close by, and sometimes it sounds further off.
Jack Sidnell (2012), a student from the University of Hawaii, explained that “speakers may use some distinctive aspects of phonology (pronunciation) and lexis (vocabulary),”
This supported the researcher’s premises, that associative priming strengthens links within the phonological system, and in doing so reduces discrepancies by encouraging spread activation. It also appears that the age difference in participant groups resulted in minor differences in correct responses, with younger adults performing better. This study was interesting, because it explored an interest in a fairly common yet widely underestimated cognitive mishap. Everyone has encountered a ‘tip of the tongue’ moment and been struck by its recovery at the most odd of moments later.
Comparison Between On the Right of Women to Vote and the Perils of Indifference Speeches “On the Right of Women to Vote by Suzan B. Anthony and “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel are among the most popular and significant speeches in the United States of America. Suzan B. Anthony made this speech in 1872 when she was accused to vote illegally. Elie Wiesel made his speech in 1999 where he was invited as intellectual to participate in Millennium Lecture Series. Although these speeches have some apparent similarities, the differences between them are also remarkable.
Professor John Gabrieli and Michael Anderson, a psychology associate professor at the University of Oregon conducted the experiment. Where 24 people between the ages of 19 and 31 were given 36 pairs of nouns that were not related and asked to memorize them. After a few minutes they were able to remember them. This experiment was documented using a functional magnetic resonance imaging machine to view the brains processes. They were then asked to only remember the first words and forget the pairs while more scans were taken.
Lisa Abrams’ (2008) article explored difficulty recalling words in different populations and the cognitive processes that cause the resolution of these occurrences. Abrams’ (2008) conducted a multitude of studies surrounding what she referred to as a tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) state and a pop-up resolution. A TOT state refers to the inability to retrieve a word an individual is familiar with. TOT states increase as an individual grows older, and can cause extreme frustration (Abrams, 2008). Abrams (2008) explained the resolution of these states are referred to as pop-up resolutions.
The results showed that indeed the words at the semantic level of processing were remembered the best and the words of the structural level were memorized poorly. Nonetheless, it could be argued that the semantic level of processing would be different for all individuals depending on their background and life experiences, as perhaps some words are understood more widely than others. It also depends on the language used to present the words and if the language was the first, second or possibly even the third language of the
If information stored in the short-term memory is not learned and given attention, it will decay over time (Schunk 2012, p. 183). The short-term memory has a small capacity, and large amounts of information cannot all be stored (Schunk 2012, p. 183). To make it esier, information can be shortened or broken up to fit it in the short-term memory (Schunk 2012, p. 183). Information that is used will be transferred into the long-term store/ long-term memory (Schunk 2012, p. 183). There are different strategies to strengthen the memory of information from short-term to long-term.
The different information (what the words say and the color of the words) your brain receives causes the problem. The Stroop effect shows how the brain deals with different information. The interference is caused by one side of the brain dominating the other one wants to read the word and the other side wants to say the color. The brain has limited attention resources. (Balota, Marsh 2006) Effect of aging
On the other hand, non-words do not have meaning, so their semantic representation are not a problem. In the case of the pseudohomophone condition, a sound based representation is required since the words' meaning do not correspond to colors. These semantic representations can be manipulated if the subject do not pay attention at the word itself and try to see it as a colored object. In fact, this would be the ideal strategy to complete the experiments accurately. If successfully accomplished, this goes against the idea that reading is an automatic process and the semantic activation cannot be
In an attempt to help the general public understand challenging words, Table Alphabeticall was published
• It involves assigning relevant sense for each word in
Its because of a learning disability called dyslexia. It usually takes children with dyslexia a while longer than children without dyslexia to read a word that would generally be considered simple. Dyslexia is a disorder that involves difficulty in learning to read or interpret words, letters, and other symbols, but that does not affect general intelligence.