For the establishment to actively contemplate and strategize an avenue to change convention rules, to take delegation votes away from Donald Trump is an egregious insult to the American public who voted in the primary. The actions of the party, to include those delegates who conspired to turn those votes over to a different candidate, who by the way did not exist, sadly make the Democratic Party appear to they be the party of the American public. Yes, a significant percentage of voters think the Democratic Party is corrupt, however, even contemplating a method to alter or reallocate those votes designated for Donald Trump screams of the parties contempt for the American
Machiavelli’s realistic outlook causes him to emphasize that it is better to maintain power through fear, rather than compassion. Despite this, he notes that a ruler must avoid his people hating him. A hated ruler possesses no power since the people hold the power. Therefore, a ruler can be miserly, unfaithful, and ruthless, but they must appear to be the opposite. Machiavelli concludes that it is important for a ruler to balance his reputation and his actions, which I agree with, however others may argue that a ruler can posses both qualities.
Republicans and Democrats alike hastened into polling places to cast their vote. Legal American citizens placed their ballots to make their voice heard above all the white noise of politics. Today, America is deeply rooted into the Two-Party system. This system establishes organization that keeps chaos from claiming this free land. Without this structure that naturally assumed position from the very first election, all citizens would be thrown into disarray, immediately confused by the change.
One of the first struggles the men encountered was on who should elect the president. There were two sides, the supporters of the legislative branch electing the president and the supporters of popular vote. After much heated debate, and leaving the subject of the executive branch and returning to it, an idea was proposed. This proposal goes to the roots of our nation as it was made in compromise of the two most popular standing ideas. This proposal was the electoral college.
Is this the right way to vote for the president of the United States. Overall, should the Electoral College stay in place or should it be replaced? The Electoral College has many cons that must be heard before a decision can be made. A huge downside to the Electoral College is that it misperceives the general population into thinking that they
Both men identified what they believed the present danger to colonists and their efforts of resistance. Sherwood seeks to warn his listeners about the dangers of a tyrannical government. He is quick to identify that ruling justly is possible, but he calls on the congregation to restore the fear of God into their superiors. Boucher takes on a different tone, condoning senseless violence by comparing it to the Old Testament story of David and his son Absalom. Knowing the story, the colonists recognize his warning to be against retaliation, as Absalom dies despite David’s desire for him to live.
In his essay, Emerson urges people to remain consistent with their past. However, this statement does not make sense in some cases. So, Emerson wants every person to remain themselves and not adapt to “society’s demands and conventions” (Emerson). Consequently, his response to Gordon’s and Sahagun’s article would be that every person should have tenacity in them, should not blindly follow the crowd, and be themselves. Emerson would see the egoistic nature of the people of Gen Y, and would be glad if it stayed the same.
Most of our leaders in government were elected to make decisions on society’s behalf, and the people of our country will never respect someone selling empty promises and unrealistic dreams. This is especially true when it comes to the presidency and campaigns. Often presidential candidates will try to cover up their mistakes. They will attempt to rewrite history to appear perfect to the voters. This is a poor strategy.
It is just an obsolete framework that ought to be discarded. In numerous races before, Presidential competitors who did not win a greater part of the well-known vote, or even a majority, were chosen the president because of the Electoral College. Therefore, I support the statement that it should be
He also states that while it is unnecessary for the prince to have positive qualities, such as honesty, trustworthiness, sympathy, compassion, or be religious, it is essential for the prince to be viewed so by the public (pg. 37). While many people argue that Machiavelli’s legitimization of lying and deception in politics is immoral, I argue the opposite. The use of lying and deception in politics is moral, because they are essential tools utilized by politicians to maintain the overall wellbeing of the society. There are numerous examples of politicians lying and deceiving to maintain the well-being of the public.
That is how the people view it, then there is how the government views it. There are different parts of the government like the political parties, the special interest groups, the president. After the great debate of Roe vs Wade there has been many debates even violence associated with the idea of abortion. Background information of Roe vs. Wade was that it turned mostly everyone against abortion because the government decided to keep
The position of Vice President is often overlooked because many have directly stated that it was “not worth a pitcher of warm spit” and found themselves with the primary job of simply waiting. Does this contradict your personal impression when you picture the role of the Vice Presidency? Has this changed over the years up to Obama’s administration? Do you believe there should be a constitutional amendment that gives them more responsibility or is having the President involving them in more daily decision making enough? Explain your position.