Peacekeeping is a common practice in which a party that is neutral is bestowed with the responsibility of managing complex crises or conflicts. The party in question works towards creating conditions that is favorable to long-lasting peace, apart from reducing civilian fatalities when rivaling camps are at war. The United Nations (UN) is mandated to keep peace whenever an international political conflict emerges. In essence, the UN can only intervene when the warring parties provide consent. In such cases, it deployes its security forces to the strategic location of the conflict.
UN’s Peacekeeping History and Methods
Before the Cold War era, the core functions of the UN peacekeepers had not been chartered. As early as 1948, UN military observers
…show more content…
The peacekeeping history of the UN dates back to 1992 when Boutros Ghali revitalized the body after the Cold War periods. As the Secretary-General, Ghali sought to define the mandate of the UN, he acknowledged that peacekeeping should only be limited to the consent of the parties at war. Apart from the issue of consent, Ghali wanted the UN operation to be defined by the principles of impartiality as well as the restricted use of force. However, officers of the UN could only be allowed to use much force only in cases of self-defense. The three principles of the UN peacekeepers are often interrelated, although they must also be jointly …show more content…
Therefore, peacekeepers affiliated to the UN are required to be impartial in the manner in which they are dealing with the conflicting parties. However, there exists no limit to the level at which the intermediaries can penalize the parties if they fail to adhere to the agreed terms. Accordingly, the peacekeepers have a responsibility to ensure that the parties of the conflict act only in a manner that can enhance the peace process. In as much as the UN has a mandate to establish an excellent relationship with the parties at war, it is also expected to refrain from any dealings with them to prevent it from compromising on the principle of impartiality. In essence, the principle of impartiality can only be limited to the fact that both parties derive a sense of credibility from peacekeepers’ operations. Without this credibility, one party may tend to withdraw its consent. In carrying out its role, impartiality is often an important aspect of legitimacy. As such, the legitimacy of the UN can only be acknowledged when both parties have confidence in it; with none of them feeling that the organization is favoring the
Although the concept of peacekeeping was evident before Lester B. Pearson, it was him who promoted for United Nations to establish an official peacekeeping force during the Suez crisis. He stated, “We need action not only to end the fighting but to make the peace... My own government would be glad to recommend Canadian participation in such
Bosnia was a multi-ethnic country and because of this conflicts in the country arose, it involved the Serbians, Croatians and Bosniaks. (Granatstein, 2006) The UN saw how dangerous this war would become and sent a group of peacemakers to resolve the war. Canada was one of the countries chosen to help in peacekeeping and they not only resolved the crisis but they also helped the civilians in Bosnia by building roads, schools and buildings.(Granatstein, 2006) Canadian peacemakers also helped create ‘safe zone’ areas where people were guaranteed safety and the wounded were also treated in these areas.
Literally, peacekeeping means to keep peace. Peacekeeping differs from peacemaking. Peacemaking involves troops directly in armed combat. Its purpose it to bring the warring sides to peace by the use of force.
The U.N Security was notified by an urgent request from the U.S. The U.N agreed to call upon North Korea to stop their military actions and withdraw to the north of the 38th parallel line immediately. In addition to this, the Council had also decided that all of the member states of the U.N should support
The United States Army entered Mosul, but at no time did they think they would have to run the country. The U.S had a plan, but when that plan failed, they had to go to their next option. The next option for the commander in Iraq was to move the 101st up to Mosul to secure it (Lundberg & Zimmerman). The 101st commanders really did not know what to expect, but one thing he knew is that securing Mosul would be a key element in the future and building of Iraq.
The United Nations included an executive committee, named the security council, who would directly control UN peacekeeping
It had a lot of terms to try to maintain world peace. Cold war tensions between the USSR and the USA prevented a permanent UN force from being created. As an alternative, the UN decided to send temporary military forces into the world regional hotspots to keep the peace. Military officials were sent to the Pakistan-India region of Kashmir. The same action was taken the following month along the Arab-Israeli borders in Palestine.
During the 20th century, approximately 174 million people have been killed by the government only and mostly by the communist governments (Dominic & Abimbola, 39). The figures are quite shocking. This clearly depicts that governments exploits the innocent people and incite them to stand against their brothers and sisters. The same story happened in Rwanda in 1994. According to the UN reports, 75% of the Tutsi population was exterminated in the genocide.
In the UNSC’s article 51, individual and collective self-defense can be authorized by the UNSC under the framework of collective security. However, genocide is never justifiable in the eyes of the UN. Perhaps the most distinguishing feature between war and genocide is the disproportionally ability of those involved to fight back. Within war there is a certain level of understanding that those engaging in the conflict will have an ability to engage in battle. However, historically in genocides the effected groups have had little to no ability to proportionately fight against their attackers.
The US military plays a major role in the defense system of the world. Their role can be in the form of military aid, deployment of the military and deployment of the Coast Guards and the protection of people’s lives and freedom. The US is well known for providing military aid to many different countries. The aim of military aid is usually to help allies or poor countries to fight terrorism, counter-insurgencies or to help fight drug wars.
Since the rights and duties of an entity such as the UN must depend upon its purposes and functions. The UN was found to be capable of possessing international rights and duties and had the capacity to maintain its rights by bringing international
Therefore, this paper is designed to illustrate reasons why the UNSC should be reformed. The first and foremost factor to why the UNSC should be reformed is because the veto power used within the council only revolves around the permanent members’ interests. By 1990s, one
Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter states that, "all member states shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, nor in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations” . It is therefore a unilateral agreement signed by member states against the use of force when dealing each other. World events however since the signing and ratification of the UN Charter have indicated that states who are signatories to the charter continue to use force against each other for various reasons. Some 25 years after the writing and ratification of the charter one cannot doubt that states have used force and sought to justify it through individual or collective self-defence claims, as well as humanitarian claims in furtherance of national agendas and to increase territory. This no doubt may have been what frustrated Franck into the stance that Article 2(4) was in its grave.
The authorized intervention was granted by UN Security Council. Chapter VII of the Charter also provides one clear exception to the non-intervention principle by granting powers to the Security Council to determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, to maintain or restore international peace and security. The necessity of multilateral cooperation in dealing with international peace and security was widely accepted and the use of multilateral intervention became one of the mechanisms employed by the international community in dealing with crisis. The UN R2P:
With the security council as its quasi-leader, the UN is able to generate and pass out resolutions when international matters need to be addressed. Though, like every IGO, the UN is non binding, IGOs like the UN survive based off the four principles aforementioned in the second paragraph. The UN has been successful in resolving several conflicts, which is an idea that stays parallel with neoliberal theory. Through varying peace enforcement measures, the UN has managed to resolve conflicts such as the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, reach and establish peace in Cote d’ivoire, and resolve ethnic conflict in Kosovo. Though these initiatives required the use of force, they helped reduce war and genocide, and returned the world to the status