Relationships are formed through communication. However, there are instances when communication becomes complex and multifaceted, which is believed to be part of its nature. At some point, there are several instances wherein a simple miscommunication and misunderstanding can heavily bring down a relationship or complicates everything. This does not solely account for communication and its nature alone, as there are also several factors that can hinder effective communication, such as the simple noise. Moreover, the point of the matter is that communication plays a vital part for people from different cultures, personalities or race to get to know each other. The complexity of communication and interpersonal relationships can possibly be attributed …show more content…
It is commonly known that there are three styles of communication in relationship—passive, aggressive and assertive. Among these styles, this essay will mainly discuss assertive communication. Assertiveness
It was learned during the leaning event that assertiveness has been defined in different contexts and in different forms. These definitions are presented by Pipaş and Jaradat in their journal and summarized in the table below.
Author Definition of Assertiveness
Rimm and Masters (1979) Assertive behavior is an interpersonal behavior involving relatively honest and direct expression of thoughts and feelings that are socially appropriate and take into account the feelings and welfare of other people.
Lazarus (1973) It is the ability to say no, the ability to ask favors or make requests, ability to express positive and negative feelings, the ability to initiate, continue and finish a general conversation.
Lange and Jacubowski (1976) Assertiveness involves personal rights and expressing thoughts, feelings and beliefs directly, honestly and appropriately, without violating the rights of others.
Source: Pipaş and Jaradat (2010, p.
…show more content…
As stressed by Pipas and Jaradat (2010), one should first know the needs and how these needs are acquired. In the context of an organization, it is the objective of an assertive communicator to win in a manner that problems are solved and results are maximized. This kind of relationship has paved the way for assertive communication to serve as the middle way and would involve “request of own rights and denial of tasks in a simple, direct manner” (Pipas and Jaradat 2010, p.652).
As for Lloyd (1988), assertiveness means “the ability to express one’s feelings, opinions, beliefs and needs directly, openly and honestly, assert one’s rights whilst respecting the feelings and rights of another.” This definition has been at the core of the class discussion. Several things were actually learned in the aspect where being assertive is concerned. For one, I personally believed that being assertive is a challenge, as it would sound simpler to be either passive or aggressive. Realistically speaking, people tend to be either passive or aggressive in reacting to certain things, which may have caused misunderstanding and miscommunication. Leading to be assertive is absolutely the right way to communicate in my
Topic: In Building American Identity unit four was about the tragic hero. Developing Sentences: The tragic hero is usually seen as a person in power, which persuades the idea that the hero is a king or queen. Yet, the tragic hero can be a normal person, which develops the image of a hero who does what they think is needed. The hero takes a path that they believe is right, which suggests that the consequence that happens is tragic.
For instance, Sara is more assertive than I. She dedicated herself to become a seamstress at a young age and went to study at a gymnasium in France even though both went against the traditional roles of women. I, on the other hand, am usually passive when it comes to taking charge. In a way, if there is ever a chance for me to take on a challenge that could end up benefiting me, I would be hesitant to act. For example, I had a chance take all honor classes when I first moved to a new school but my cautious nature took over and I lost that chance to achieve more that year.
Communicating under uncertainty. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research. Newbury Park. Hogg, M. A. (n.d.).
Communication of the Sexes The tongue of a blue whale can weigh as much as an elephant, but there exists a tongue that is far more powerful than that of the blue whale’s tongue, that is the human tongue (Santoso). When utilized properly, the human tongue can accomplish great feats, but if misused can cause a plethora of problem. A certain measure of success in life depends on utilizing communication in a wise way. Debra Tannen, a well-known authority on communication, says men and women communicate in different ways.
Themes in The Crucible Themes play a big part in the lives of those in the real world , and those in the fiction world. The Crucible is a play that displays many themes through a variety of characters , and not one character in this play shows just any one theme there are multiple. The Crucible has many characters that play enormous roles that affect everything around them due to the theme of deception. Followed by the theme of integrity ,and the theme of reputation.
She emphasizes the recognition of “cross-cultural” communication is beneficial to repair the conversational issues (Tannen 264). She proposes couples to improve their relationship by learning differences, adjusting conversational styles, and changing attitude. Learning differences is crucial to couples at the beginning of improvement, which helps couples to achieve mutual acceptance. Ideally, couples change their communication patterns according to their partners’ preference.
Communication is an inevitable aspect of life. It is an event which happens almost every second of every day. Communication is an act of giving and receiving of information—desires, needs, perceptions, knowledge, etc.—of two or more persons through orthodox or unorthodox methods which can either be intentional or unintentional (de Valenzuela 2002). There are numerous types of communication and one is interpersonal communication. Interpersonal communication is one of the communication fields that several studies have focused on.
Communication is a critical foundation of every relationship; without it the relationship is deemed unsuccessful. Unsuccessful communication can result in constant tension, power inequalities and disagreements. Relational Dialectics is a communication theory, formed by Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery, in which personal relationships are judged upon the management of tension produced by contradictory forces. (Thrift, 2017). Each of the contradictory forces contain two components, an internal source, between the individuals in the relationship and and external source, which is interference from the outside world.
Introduction Communication is a very powerful thing and it is so powerful that humans and animals can interact with each other and communication is inevitable and it is either verbal or non-verbal and it can be effective or ineffective and it important that communication is effective or else you as an individual will not be able to build relationships and maintain them for a long time. The essay will talk about my strengths and limitations in a dyadic conversation between my friend and me. I will be focussing on myself in the conversation. The essay will also cover the communication concepts and basics. Strength (Effective Communication) There are two types of ways to communicate, effectively and ineffectively, the type of communication that will be discussed in the paragraph is effective communication.
Yet, one thing still remained – our interpersonal communication. We still exchange information. We still speak about our feelings, through verbal and non-verbal messages. Over time, myriads of professors have developed different theories that humans communicate. This paper will take a look at Knapp’s Relationship Theory what the purpose of the study is and the results.