Surprisingly, the Safavid rapidly declined after the rule of Abbas I, despite being at its peak. Several of his Abbas’ advisors plotted to take control of the throne and prevented any legitimate heir succeeding the throne, otherwise, the empire would have lasted much longer than it did. High state officials appointed his grandson to the throne, someone easily manipulated, after Abbas’ death. From that point on, the succession of leaders could not maintain or return the empire to its glory days. Furthermore, the trend of isolating princes in atmospheres of luxury and intrigue led to a decline in Safavid rulers. Too few able leaders like Abbas II came to halt the decline. In addition, internal strife including, factional disputes and rebellions
In both empires, corruption of government
“For legitimizing their rulership, founders of Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empire claimed to descend from certain historical, political or religious leaders. Explain how each of these imperial dynasties claimed such legitimacies and compare them in terms of similarities and differences in the process of establishing their authority.” ALİHÜSEYİN ALTUNBAŞ SOCIAL SCIENCES UNİVERCITY OF ANKARA The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires were three major Islamic empires (Gunpowder Empires) that emerged in the medieval period.
The Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire, two significant Islamic empires, coexisted throughout the beginning of history. The Safavid Empire arose in the early sixteenth century, while the Ottoman Empire began in the early fifteenth. The Safavid Empire was based in Iran, but the Ottoman Empire was mainly based in the Middle East. Shia Muslims dominated the Safavid Empire, as opposed to Sunni Muslims who ruled the Ottoman Empire. Considering their differing religious convictions, the Safavids and Ottomans shared similar visual and cultural traditions.
More quickly than it took to build the empire, it began to fall into pieces,” (Background Essay). If an empire takes less time to fall apart than it took to build, that says quite a lot about the leader’s ability to plan well for the
If these two once-great forces were crumbling, how did the Arab empire manage to thrive? Islam owed its great accomplishments to their strong devotion to their religion, the size of both their empire and trading network,
Several factors prompted this decline such as: several economic problems, the rise of other trade routes, the European hunger for expansion, and weakness in the Ottoman government Furthermore, the Ottoman Empire was both politically and militarily strong, yet, it was too traditional and could not keep up with worldwide changes and modernity through time. Europe and the West were rapidly moving forward innovatively while the Ottomans stayed in their place for too long. All these problems led to the empire being less centralized in Europe. Simply, the Great Powers of Europe took advantage of this situation and allied to completely end the rule of Ottomans. To further affect the empire, European powers chose an Ottoman strength and turned it into a weak point.
Due to this conflict, there was more of a disconnect and that pushed the states apart which
Ottoman Empire Summary The Ottoman Empire had been around for hundreds of years. However it began to weaken. The weakness was from the Ottomans struggle to modernize.
All empires in history had a high in their history but they all eventually came to their demise. The Ottoman Empire and the Ming Dynasty both had ways they gained, consolidated and maintained their power while they were at their highest point. They had significant leaders that lead to these successful points. The Ottoman Empire covered parts of Asia, Europe and Africa controlled by their leader named Suleiman.
Throughout history, many impactful and memorable empires have arisen. Each empire has its own defining traits that lead to its success or demise. Some empires are very similar, while some posses many different traits. And although some can possess the same quality, their implication and utilization of that quality can create many gaps in the empire’s overall similarity to the other. Two powerful and historically important empires are the Ottoman empire, and the Mughal empire.
The Assyrians held a huge obsession with war and because of this, many casualties resulted leading to their downfall. Due to the many causalities, their numbers begin to dwindle and outsiders began to see this as an opputunity to attack and take over. In the end, they were in such a weakened state that, they eventually were defeated by the people of Babylon and they were no longer an independent state. The Persian empire came to power with the help of a powerful leader.
The Muslim world expanded tremendously during the 1300s to 1700s. The Ottoman Empire and Safavid Empire were two out of the three empires that had significant changes during these time. Though the Ottoman and Safavid Empire contrast on leaders and ways they rule, they similar on their declination and cultures. In the Ottoman Empire, multiples leaders contributed to the growth of the Empire. Ghazis were warriors for the Islam that followed strict Islamic rules.
Confusion of leadership caused the government to be highly unstabalized and as the empire grew; lower classes were being burdened by increasing taxes. Ineffective leadership did not allow these problems to be addressed and over extension of borders caused the empire to be too much for one person to rule so the empire was split into two eastern and western
Steadily the military unity declined leading to conquest by the Turks of the Ottoman Empire in
The population went down due to diseases. The country could not hold its own against other world powers such as the huns and the germans. The Germans overran the city of Rome this lead to downfall because it was the end of the country ir got destroyed by foreian invaders. The Roman Empire was on its last breath.