ipl-logo

World War Dbq Essay

752 Words4 Pages

What is the most effective way to stop a world war? On September 1, 1939, Germany invaded Poland (Timeline), going against the Treaty of Versailles but no one did anything. Every nation ignored the actions of Hitler, which in turn probably gave Hitler the message that he could do whatever he wanted and get away with it. As his actions become unbearable to ignore, the nations became angered and joined the war. The world was then split into two opposing teams: the Axis powers (which housed Germany, Japan, and Italy) and the Allied powers (Great Britain, the United States, China, and the Soviet Union). Would this continuation of appeasement have stopped the war, or should the nations have stood up against Hitler? Before the war was burgeoning, …show more content…

Hitler also wrote that it was Germany’s right to take back the land they had lost. He pledged to get revenge and even though his book told every big nation his plans, no one did anything. No one dared because they did not want another world war on their hands. They also allowed Hitler to host the 1936 Summer Olympics and the United States even pulled two Jewish competitors out in fear of embarrassing Hitler. All of these actions were part of appeasing Hitler. The nations thought that if they ignored Hitler, he would become dissuaded to do what he planned for Germany. The nations continued this for quite a while, even going as far as giving Hitler Sudetenland just to avoid a world war that would start in Europe (Doc 4). This made many Europeans ecstatic, but the Czechs were angered. The gullible British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, believed that appeasement was the answer to all their problems (Doc 5) and that if they let Hitler do whatever he pleased, everything would go away. Appeasement did not go as far as Chamberlain thought it would and it still …show more content…

They wanted to take a stand, but their country was not ready for it. Before the United States had entered World War II, Churchill had warned the people of England that appeasement has left them without “a strong national defense or system of international security” (Doc 6). Churchill did not like appeasement and voiced his opinion to anyone who would listen. All around the world, many believed ignorance was bliss, but in the case of World War II, that saying was very false. Ignoring Hitler only made him all the more determined to start a war and come out on top. If the nations would have acted as one and not ignore Hitler, concentration camps would have been avoided, thousands of innocent lives would have lived on. To stand up is to show courage and even though everyone fought in a war, it was like they cowarded before that fought. The League of Nations may have worked if everyone were present and willing to go against the things they were unsure

Show More
Related

  • How Did Hitler Use Collective Security

    924 Words  | 4 Pages

    What path should the allied powers have gone down in order to create a world peace? Would the world consist of less poverty? How would world history and economy be different from how it is today? Nations opposing Adolf Hitler should have used collective security to potentially stop a world war. Three reasons why opposing nations should have used collective security is because if Hitler were appeased, then he would continue to imperialise other nations.

    Read More

  • Ben Franklin's Statement In World War II

    1139 Words  | 5 Pages

    Britain Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain had all but forfeited the European mainland to Nazi Germany. Eventually, Hitler continued to take over land and grow his popularity in Germany as well as his power. For Example, Hitler became Führer of Germany after German President Hindenburg dies on August 2 1934. (HistoryPlace.com) After years of Hitler’s growth as a dictator in Germany, the idea of expansionism was a recurring idea.

    Read More

  • Hitler's Use Of Propaganda In Germany

    275 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the most important factors of a leader being successful at war is having strong support from their home front and Adolf Hitler used this to his advantage a multitude of times during his reign as chancellor of Germany through the use of propaganda. One example of this was on September 1st, 1939 when Adolf Hitler ordered a blitzkrieg attack at Germany’s eastern border, unto Poland. This act he knew, would trigger a declaration of war from England. On the same day as the attack “The New York Times” reported Hitler as to have said “Germans in Poland are persecuted with a bloody terror and are driven from their homes. The series of border violations, which are unbearable to a great power, prove that the Poles no longer are willing to respect the German frontier.”

    Read More

  • Pearl Harbor's Negative Impact On The Lives Of Japanese Americans

    1393 Words  | 6 Pages

    1939 marked the start of World War II in Germany, quickly spreading throughout Europe. Germany, Italy, and Japan made enemies with the United States, England, and France, who became known as the Allied Forces. The war was initiated by the actions of German dictator, Adolf Hitler, whose goal was to conquer the world for his own personal gain. Hitler was a communist who had the unique ability to persuade nations into joining him in his beliefs and actions, which resulted in the deaths of millions of people for their religious views and cultures. The United States remained neutral from 1939-1941.

    Read More

  • How Should Adolf Hitler Use Collective Security

    924 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the Treaty of Versailles was set in place, a loosely defined area called the Rhineland was to be unoccupied. Again, Hitler violated the treaty and sent his military into the Rhineland. The other nations could have been blinded and didn’t notice that Hitler slowly eased his way into more and more areas in which were neutral or were to be left alone. If other countries would have responded to this, it would have changed Hitler 's view on how vulnerable and weak the other nations are. Not only this, but Hitler explained his movement as a “return to European collective cooperation.”(doc.

    Read More

  • Treaty Of Versailles Dbq Essay

    421 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although the Treaty of Versailles was meant to end the war, the treaty caused more problems like, the treaty took some of Germany's land, tried to control germany's military, and set blame to just one country. All of these things that the treaty caused, helped cause World War II. The Treaty of Versailles took away some of Germany's land and this caused people of germany to get angry. The treaty took away many coal producing areas away from Germany (Doc A), which caused Germany to be poorer.

    Read More

  • Hitler And Stalin Essay

    1670 Words  | 7 Pages

    Chamberlain followed a policy of appeasement with Hitler in order to keep peace and avoid any future potential conflict from occuring. The three points that exemplify the reason as to why Chamberlain appeased Hitler, all indicate that Chamberlain’s Britain saw appeasement as the best possible approach towards Hitler’s radical German regime. In the period after World War 1, nations across Europe began to build and strengthen themselves in order to gain the collective security of their nation as well as international prestige and superiority. The recently signed Treaty of Versailles severely punished Germany for the damage it had caused. When Germany began to grow and expand, breaking the rules established by the Treaty of Versailles, international leaders such as Neville Chamberlain believed in a policy of appeasement because they thought that Germany was simply trying to recover from all that was taken away from them.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Nicolo Machiavelli's The Prince

    840 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Machiavellian philosophy of “it is best to be loved AND feared; if you can’t be both, then be feared.” applies to Adolf Hitler because he was both feared and loved. After WW1, Germany was in bad shape and when Hitler came and assured the people recovery, they could not refuse. In return Hitler brought down the unemployment in Germany from 7 million to only 1 million in 12 months.

    Read More

  • Causes Of Disarmament

    794 Words  | 4 Pages

    The powers now knew that Germany was secretly rearming so they also began to remilitarize. The disarmament struggled for a whole year in the background before completely failing and ending in

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Appeasement

    2028 Words  | 9 Pages

    Appeasement would have been the right decision if it had worked out equally between the countries . Everything that has its positive side, also has its negative side and it was the same situation with appeasement. There are mainly 3 disadvantages of appeasement which are appeasers misjudged Hitler , Appeasement was morally wrong and finally appeasers missed a lot of chances to stop hitler . The appeasers misjudged Hitler, appeasement was morally wrong and finally the appeasers missed excellent chances to stop hitler .

    Read More

  • Cause Of World War 2 Essay

    545 Words  | 3 Pages

    Which was 1 an agreement between France, Italy, Nazi Germany, and Britain. [Since] Germany invaded the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, the British and French prime ministers tried to get Hitler to agree not to use his military in the future in return for the land he had taken.   This act was unsuccessful as Hitler invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia, then this led Britain and France to declare World War II. Another cause of World War II was Fascism. Since the World War I left the economy a mess, countries were being taken over by dictators, as these dictators looked for new lands to conquer.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Appeasement

    1151 Words  | 5 Pages

    As a result, one can deduce that the Appeasement policy agreed between Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler was both a feasible and non-feasible approach from both sides; both having pros and cons and different results if they acted differently towards the policy. In the eyes and views of many historians and analysts of World War II and Neville Chamberlain’s Appeasement policy with Adolf Hitler, many say that the appeasement was the right choice during the inter-war period because it was “based on traditional perceptions of foreign interests and a rational assessment of military means and political will.” REF The people of Great Britain did not want to suffer another war, having already been hit harshly from World War I, hence, allowing the cabinet to use terms of negotiation with Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany and form some sort of “peace” between one

    Read More

  • How Did Adolf Hitler Overconfidence

    526 Words  | 3 Pages

    Overconfidence: By the time of World War II, Hitler have already secured most of the Europe land and all these started with the destruction of the Treaty of Versailles(TOV). He broke off these chains that held him back by leaving the League of Nations. After that, he started to get ready his army and armory required for him to invade his desired countries through the Anglo-German Naval Agreement in 1935, which allowed Germany’s Kriegsmarine total tonnage to be 35% of the Royal Navy’s tonnage, and by remilitarising in the Rhineland in 1936, disregarding the restriction of army forces as stated in the TOV. He demanded the annexation of Austria under the Anschluss claim and Czechoslovakia under the Munich agreement in 1938.

    Read More

  • Was Neville Chamberlain's Policy Of Appeasement Justified?

    1045 Words  | 5 Pages

    Neville Chamberlain used many policies when it came to deciding on how to deal with Hitler. One of the main policies he pursued was appeasing Hitler. Chamberlain was a pacifist and didn’t want war so many historians believe that he used appeasement to prevent another world war. Other Historians believe he used appeasement because Britain wasn’t ready to go to war and so he was buying time so the country could prepare for war. Finally, other historians believe that he used appeasement because he wasn’t a good leader in general and that he was a pushover and was just giving in to Hitler’s demands.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Adolf Hitler Comes To Power

    369 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adolf Hitler’s main move kicked off with the need to do away with the Versailles treaty (n.p, ‘New American Nation’, n.d.). He sued this in his campaign speeches to woe the German nationals. He talked of the toil this had had on its economies as well as frustrating it armament efforts. Upon getting into power in 1933 after being elected as Germany’s chancellor, he did away with any conformity to the treaty (n.p, ‘Hitler Comes to Power,’ n.d.). Germany was up again on its feet economically as well as subsequent armament efforts in a bid to restore Germany to its prior position of being the World’s respected and most powerful super power.

    Read More

More about World War Dbq Essay

Open Document