Abortion should be illegal whether the woman was raped, got pregnant too young, or just doesn 't want to have a child because you don’t think you 're ready. You can always put the baby up for an adoption so they can go live with a family that will care for them. When you abort your unborn child you are killing a person that is half of you. Do you really want to kill a part of you? Help stop these murders, it 's well past time for these innocent lives to be saved from the cruelty
However, I do not believe that the burglar thought experiment is an analogy that accurately explains this concept if a mother gets pregnant due to failed contraception. First of all, the burglar in question has ill intent if he plans to break into your house and steal something from you. A fetus has no bad intent and is a victim of circumstance in this situation. A burglar is an adult that has the ability to use reason and understands that there are consequences to his actions of burglary. People that support abortion often cite the fact that abortion is permissible because a fetus has no rational capacities like children and adults do.
Whether the abortion is completed using drugs like RU- 486, or the surgical procedure, you are taking away a life and killing a human being. The baby is alive and not just some 'group of cells' like abortion doctors like to tell their patients. You are painfully putting a child to death which is morally wrong. How could someone have the power to end a life so harmfully? If a
The biggest dispute of the topic is whether or not people should have the right to choose, Pro Life or Pro Choice. People argue that depending on the circumstances of the mother and how she conceived the baby, it is her right to choose if it lives or dies. Others believe that no matter how you became pregnant, you should keep the baby. Abortion is not morally right because people are willingly killing an innocent child. An abortion is the intentional end of a pregnancy (WebMD).
An abortion should never be an option in any case because it’s considered as murder, it causes pain to the person and baby during and after the procedure, and there are other choices to choose from including adoption. Instead of having an abortion, women can choose a more beneficial option, such as giving the baby up for adoption. When women decide to get an abortion, they don’t think about adoption because of the long process, even though it can help other families who can’t have children. For example “It’s logical that anti-abortion organizations seeking to prevent abortions and promote traditional family structures would aggressively promote adoption, but this connection is often overlooked…”(Joyce). Many women that get pregnant with an unwanted child usually look into having an abortion first rather than going through the long process of pregnancy and giving the baby up for adoption.
Depression after abortion is caused by women who don’t let themselves grieve after the procedure (https://www.newkidscenter.com/). Abortion ProCon wrote about a 2005 study published in BMC Medicine in which it stated that “...women who underwent an abortion had significantly higher anxiety scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale up to five years after the pregnancy termination” (http://abortion.procon.org/). Five years is a long time for someone to feel this way, so women shouldn’t put themselves through that pain. Instead of allowing themselves to suffer, they should just decide not to go through with the abortion. Women’s maternal instincts are to care for a child, but many don’t realize the gravity of what they have done until after the child has been deprived of its existence.
This way mothers won’t be murdering their baby nor will they be living with something not planned. More humans are killed by abortion each year. This is why abortions should be illegal in the world today. Abortion is wrong because killing of an innocent baby is taking place. Other options are adoption.
Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is the act of permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured patients. This is never suggested by the caretaker rather than requested by the patient or their family. Few areas such as the Netherlands have already legalized this practice. This debate, as split as a fork in the road, is over whether or not this approach should be legalized worldwide on stances regarding religion, ethics, and self choice. I see this as being extremely unethical on both religious and social morality levels.
Most religions agree that life begins at the moment of conception, therefore destroying a fetus is murder. Science also agrees that the fetus has life, just the same as a developed baby . Since murder is a felony this technically makes the engineers or doctors who destroy the fetus for the use of the stem cells, criminals. Considering that abortion is legal in our country and the choice of the woman, this is not currently the public
Moral recognition begins at conception and by having an abortion robs the child of the potential that could have lived. Abortion therefore has the same equivalence as murder. The father should be arrested for raping his daughter. According to my religion, abortion is wrong and every child is seen as a blessing from God, so then why destroy God’s
Some plead that they have a fatal medical condition, were raped, or that the pregnancy was unplanned. While in rare cases this is okay, it is still wrong to take the life of another human being. Even though it may not look lkie a child, it still has a right to life. The mere thought of having an abortion is both grisly and unsettling. Another twisted piece to this puzzle is that most of the time all of the fetuses and baby parts are either sold on the black market or are donated to science.
The main issue in regards to the federal protection of a fetus is whether to treat the mother and child as two separate entities or as one single person. Parties to both sides of the argument provide very compelling reasons as to why one should be considered over the other. For example, prosecutors argue that the fetus should be considered a separate entity from the mother and that any harm that is caused to the fetus by another, including the mother, should be considered a criminal act (Elliott, 2013). Opponents, however, argue that this could backfire and jeopardize a woman’s right to choose an abortion and therefore prefer to only recognize the mother as the only victim (NCSL, 2015). Another issue involves the way each state differentiate
It is clear by acts like The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 that many people see the murder or a pregnant woman as a double homicide, and therefore should see abortion as a murder as well. It is also clear that Roe versus Wade stepped over its limit for constitutional authority, and denies the states the rights they deserve under the United States principle of federalism. Finally, the moral reasoning behind why abortion should be illegal are clear. Especially when those in the health care field, who are trained to perform abortions, see that this is
With Trump wanting to remove these services can cause difficulties within a woman’s health. “Yes, because as long as they do the abortion, I am not for funding Planned Parenthood… As long as they’re involved with abortion, as far as I’m concerned forget it, I wouldn’t fund them regardless. I would defund Planned Parenthood because of their view and the fact of their work on abortion…. I am for defunding Planned Parenthood as long as they are involved with abortion” (Donald Trump 1). Having an abortion is inhumane, but removing planned parenthood organizations because of a women’s decision of having an abortion shouldn’t be a concern for the government.