However, as that is rather an exception than a rule, in this essay I will look at the cons of foreign aid claiming that it is actually not fulfilling it’s purpose. The reasons behind giving aid are simple and somewhat naive. Countries that are better off feel morally obliged to help poorer countries in need. It is believed that aid will improve people’s lives and will reduce poverty. However noble the cause, generous contributions without thorough analysis do not always lead to good outcomes.
They argue that most studies show that where aid has dominated, pride and ambition have given way to dependence and deference, and where it has been targeted, public management and services have either decayed or collapsed, poverty and inequality have worsened, and insecurity has prevailed. He cites Rwanda as an example where many developed countries helped to position the country at the edge of the abyss of genocide – only to disclaim any responsibility in the aftermath. With a few exceptions, (Korea, Botswana and Honduras) where aid has had a significant impact on poverty reduction, improved social services and competent public institutions, in a much larger number of countries (Cuba, Zambia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Sierra Leone, Somalia) western aid has played minor role in building efficient public sector and in lifting millions out of poverty. In some cases, major recipients of aid are today collapsed states (e.g. Congo Democratic Republic, Sierra Leone, Somalia).
As situations in different countries continue to take new forms, aid can also be provided concerning military, economic means, etc. It is essentially a transfer of useful resources to a country, but that in fact raises some significant issues. Foreign aid has always been characterized as a generous and conscious effort by developed countries to aid developing, poorer countries. Although that is not always the case and it is important to note the negative repercussions that can result for a country at the receiving end. The perception with foreign aid does indeed seem ideological and in fact hopeful.
Humanitarian aid : it is the aid given by a nation to those nations who fall in victim to natural calamities earthquakes, floods, famines, epidemics.it is not only givn by the governments. It is also given by different voluntary organisations in different parts of the world.thus plays a very important role to rebilds thei
There are those who argue that foreign aid is necessary to get people out of their poverty trap as it assists them to initiate a virtuous circle that will help them to invest in critical areas. On the other hand, there are those who believe that foreign aid is wrong. Their argument is that foreign aid only gives a comforting feeling to the poor that someone is taking care of them, but the aid will not reduce their poverty. It prevents them from searching for their own solutions and might corrupt or undermine existing local authorities. This argument follows that the best option for poor countries is the idea that people can find ways to solve their problems if the markets are free and the incentives are right.
Charities make people spend money for no reason and none of the money is helping them. People don't like contributing to charities because it's no reason. If the money not benefitting them why give money. Some people don't have money to just give away for free because they have kids and they also have a family to take care of and other things to do for theirself. People can help their own community with their own money putting in fixing things they see wrong.
This type of aid does not facilitate any economic development in recipient country, but rather is used to create some symbolic objects that are associated with development and industrialization. As Morgenthau (1962, 303) puts it prestige aid can be used to build “an unprofitable or idle steel mill, the highway without traffic and leading nowhere, the airline operating with foreign personnel and at a loss but under the flag of the recipient country.” In turn, military aid can be allocated for two reasons. In the first case military aid is a way to support allies. In the second case, military aid is given in exchange for policy concession. As it was mentioned before economic aid is given in return for policy concession as well, however what makes military aid distinct is the fact that not all donors possess domestic defense industry of a sufficient quality which makes them able to provide arms.
My Service Learning Project had been planned accordingly thanks to my family, I had volunteered with my family at the homeless shelter to serve food and give necessities to the homeless before Christmas time. My personal involvement with the homeless was absolutely attending their priorities such as toiletry, food, assistance, etc. as well as providing a warm hand to be open minded with. I previously had friends who relied on the homeless shelter, and I had credible knowledge on what the homeless were asking for in terms of help. I would engage in involvement or communication with some of the homeless to not only provide their necessities, but positive social interaction.