In today’s world, sugar is viewed as toxic and harmful to the human body. Although true when consumed without moderation, sugar is extremely vital to one’s overall well-being. With the media encouraging sugar-restrictive diets, Americans are misled into believing this sweet substance is the enemy and eliminating it is the solution for reaching weight loss goals. However, this is not the case. Sugar, through the consumption of natural and unprocessed foods, is essential in order to sustain optimal fitness.
Another option was to limit the age of a person whom may be allowed to purchase sugar-added foods or drinks at schools, convenient stores, etc. Blaming added sugar as a cause of obesity is misleading to people as well as policy makers about the “truth of obesity”. Moreover, isolated reductions in added sugar ingestion will undoubtedly not lead to a decrease in obesity rates. Similar fallacies regarding added fats and the preferred decrease in fat intake have completely botched in the
Fatty liver is one of the effects of too much sugar but others include bad teeth, higher chances of cancer, diabetes type two, it’s addictive and it cause more excess fat growth. Cane and brown Sugar is natural so why is it so bad for you? Well arsenic is also natural but you wouldn 't want to be eating it because it 's a poison just like sugar. This is only a couple of things that non natural sugar does to your body, but should you stop eating it? The answer is yes or at least as much as you can help, it is definitely a good decision to give it up.
I will also be arguing that there is a link between fatty liver and too much sugar consumption. Fatty liver also goes hand in hand with diabetes. Taking that all into account I am arguing that my audience cut down on their overall consumption of sugar. That by reducing foods with high sugar content, you will feel better and reduce your risk of many diseases. Establishing credibility on why we should cut back on sugar can be demonstrated by showing the involvement in the science of sugar and the sugar industry and how they have influenced the use of sugar in our diets.
In the article from USA Today, “Eating too much added sugar may be killing you,” Nanci Hellmich expresses that consuming more than the advised limit of sugar has destructive effect on health. Hellmich states that the foods we ingest can contain more sugar than we thought. She defends her claim by exploring a multitude of experiments, presenting statistics, and addressing a quantity of researchers and organizations. Hellmich writes it in an informative tone for readers that desire to know how sugar intake is deadly. She confirms it by stating the variety of foods that are full of sugar and how much of those foods we intake.
She explains, “ditching sugar can destroy metabolism and lead to a weakened immune system, poor digestion, impaired sexual/reproductive function accelerated aging.”(Konie). Stripping sugar from your diet may help you lose some weight, but the affects of neglecting it, affects health drastically. In an article by Sarah Elizabeth Richards she explains sugar affects human health negatively, saying it’s “a host of health ills, such as obesity, diabetes, and an increased risk of cancer.”(Richards). Which are all true, however, this is true when individuals are consistently eating artificial sugars, and unnatural man-made foods. These foods have added sugars and put our lives at risk, yet eliminating natural sugars messes with body functions that need glucose (sugar) to function properly.
And although jobs come to the less developed nations, boosting the economies there, the environment suffers because the restrictions against pollution are less strict. Major companies such as Suncor and Syncrude have legal obligations with the government to restore the land that they are using to as close as they can to the natural state they found it. Sometimes these legal obligations are too expensive for companies to adhere to so they do not proceed with building the plant. This has a significant impact on environmental sustainability as well as sustainable prosperity of the people in that area or
In this paper I will be discussing the topic of Environmental Racism; which is the purposeful placement of environmentally hazardous locations such as toxic waste sites and landfills near communities of minority or low-income. My personal view on the issue of Environmental Racism is that the government is placing a huge burden on the health and safety of those who reside in communities of color and poverty by placing these waste facilities directly in their communities and exposing those to hazardous toxins and pollutants. They play around the issue of being racist, and although they won’t admit to it, it seems quite obvious that there is a correlation between the placement of these facilities and the community. I believe every person, no matter
Sugar Sugar is very bad for you because you can die earlier, it increases your risk for cancer, and it drives up unnecessary calories without adding any nutritional benefits. Sugar is the most controversial topic in the U.S. because of the obesity ratings in our country. Sugar is the most debated topic in the health department, and rightfully it should be. According to the articles, many people have different perspectives on the topic. According to Sarah Richards, she claims “people who consumed more than a quarter of their daily calories as sugar are more likely to die earlier.”(Bitter Truth about sugar and its effects on our health) I completely agree with this statement because sugar is the number one leader towards obesity.
As the global warming becomes a much more serious problem, scientists suggest to place a tax on meat and dairy to decrease greenhouse emission. They found that raising livestock is a large source of greenhouse emission. A successful tax on these good could cut the consumption of the meat and dairy and directly reduce the greenhouse emission and improve human health. The meat and dairy business actually has negative externalities of production to the society. Negative externalities of productions arise when the production of a good spillover negative cost on a third party, which is often times the environment as whole.
Lustig (2012) explains and suggests the following: Authorities consider sugar as ‘empty calories’ but there is nothing empty about these calories. A growing body of scientific evidence is showing that fructose can trigger processes that lead to liver toxicity and a host of other chronic diseases… they [Government] must consider limiting fructose and its main delivery vehicles, the added sugars HFCS (high-fructose corn syrup) and sucrose, which pose dangers to individuals and to society as a whole. (p.28) Another process that occurs in the body is that, “sugar dampens the suppression of the hormone ghrelin, which signals hunger to the brain…interferes with the normal transport and signaling of the hormone leptin, which helps to produce the feeling of satiety…and it reduces dopamine signaling in the brain’s reward center” (Lustig, 2012, p. 28). Though these are only a few examples and there are many more such as sugar feeding cancer cells, it should give you a basic understanding of just how bad sugar is for the
Johnson mentions, “Americans are fat because they eat too much and exercise too little” (Cohen). There will always be an excuse for putting off exercise. Americans need to realize that without changes in ways, humans can die from multiple causes due to obesity. It not only affects the body’s performance, but overall health. It is believed that sugar is a drug itself.
When sitting down drinking a diet soda people really don’t think about what makes diet soda diet. If food and drink companies put diet on front of something does that automatically make it beater or even good for the consumer? When making something diet companies usually go straight for the artificial sweeteners to drop the calories in a food or drink, and when people pick up the diet product off the shelf at the store and they automatically think its good or better for them because of just one little word added to the label. But is it really better for you or could these sweeteners be doing harm? Yeah it might help someone loose that one extra pound or help with fitting into that year-old pair of pants that someone has been just dyeing to