Democracy In Singapore Essay

Introduction

Democracy is better political system for Singapore compared to Communism and Socialism.

Background
1. As Singapore gained independence in1965, Singapore was a third world country and its role as the entrepot of the region is becoming defunct. Singapore then was plagued with riots and instability. Futhermore, Singapore was in situation of resource constraint. The only resource Singapore had was human resource. To make matter worse Singapore then was a disparate collection of immigrants from China, British India and the Dutch East Indies. Singapore was multi racial multi cultural. People adopted their respective language, culture, religion, values system.

2. During the period of Singapore’s independence, there were

Communism – a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state. It is a movement meant to create a classless, moneyless, and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production, as well as a social, political, and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of this social order. In other words, no classes such as Rich and Poor, and that everything is owned by the community, no one 's to be more superior then another, everything is the property of the community. Hence the word Commun in Communism. Commun meaning community, community being everyone! The political system in communism usually takes the form of totalitarianism as Marx described in The Communist Manifesto. The totalitarianism is a political system in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible. It enshrines the idea that the will of the leader is law, that the power of the state must be total and that enemies of the people must be liquidated. Totalitarianism is most closely associated with the Stalinist Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. Its features include dictatorial power, mass mobilization, a personality cult of the leader, a secret or paramilitary police state and extraordinarily high levels of political violence directed at internal enemies or undesirable