Anthem Revealed In A Dystopian Society

This is something in Anthem that people in the society do not have. Examples of this is they did not have their own unique names. They are not allowed to use possessive words such as “I” or “Myself”. One pledge that Equality and his brothers state before they retired to their beds is, “We are nothing. Mankind is all.

It appears that the structure of Omelas is actually lack structure, for “there was no king. They did not use swords, or keep slaves. They were not barbarians. I do not know the rules and laws of their society, but I suspect that they were singularly few” (Le Guin). When citizens discover the child in the basement, they realize that there are more flaws in the structure of Omelas than they originally thought.

Henceforth, to inhibit the control within the community, the rules should be restricted. The long list of overstated rules does not make a community perfect. In fact, it limits the people’s ability to be unique individuals and limits the freedom within the community. The rules are not important and should be restricted. These dystopian societies are profoundly ordered and have high standards, but that does not mean that they are perfect.

The citizens cannot ever think about feelings because they have never been exposed to it. In Ally Condie’s “Matched” and Lois Lowry’s “The Giver” reveals dehumanization, surveillance over everyone , and propaganda. “The Giver” by Lois Lowry is most

In dystopian literature people are merely submissive followers of the system. They do not contribute in any activities except what the government determines; Henriette Wien explains in her

Generally speaking, the deterrence theory is an encouraging concept but it is much harder to put into play than people would think. While humans have the ability to think rationally, people generally don’t weigh out the pros and cons of every behavior they perform. In his last hours, Ted Bundy did not want to die. But he knew that Ted Bundy would be a household name and even in his last interview, promised that there were more people out there just like

“What brought it to pass? What disaster took their reason away from men? ...The worship of the word “We” (Rand 102). Finally, the idea of punishment could have differences in opinion. Arguably, it seems Equality wouldn’t have the desire to punish others in this new society (after all he faced the punishment himself, didn’t he?).

equality recognizes the flaws in this society and he knew in his heart that it was not right how they were treated and forced to live. Equality began to understand to be totally healthy you have to focus on yourself a little. this is a great lesson because it teaches you courage and it shows you how you cannot control God 's plan for individuals lives. The society quality was living in try to play God they control the height of people that job they would have their thought their schedule and told them that everyone was the same as yourself after reading it and would you Embrace other 's individuality more and be more courageous or just fall into what Society is telling

Not only did these relationships help them gain support, but they helped the characters understand each other and why they have to make sacrifices. Without Sudasa sacrificing her love life with Kiran, he would not have been able to try to leave Koyanagar . Not only did Jimmy sacrifice his trust with his mother, but he did what no other child was willing to do to help Paul. These novels show that relationships are worth fighting for, regardless of how much we have to change and sacrifice for

However, I feel that Mill’s harm principle is not efficient of specific enough to follow. There is a difference between free speech and hate speech. There are people who direct their speech to purposely harm others. This sort of speech should not be tolerated or allowed. By allowing people to express their hate in the form of speech, it would decrease the overall happiness of the majority.