The employment of standardized testing in New York City's educational system has been the subject of a contentious debate for almost 20 years. It all began in 2002 with the passing of the No Child Left Behind Act, which required students from 3rd to 8th grade to take annual standardized tests in mathematics and reading. Subsequently, in 2009, the state embraced the Common Core State Standards, which established explicit learning targets for mathematics and English Language Arts, which were subsequently evaluated through standardized tests.
The topic of standardized testing has been greeted with passionate opinions from educators and parents alike. Those in opposition claim that the tests are excessively high-stakes and have an overly narrow
…show more content…
People argue that standardized testing detracts from genuine learning and that the emphasis on test scores results in an overly narrow focus on math and reading, neglecting other crucial areas of education, such as social studies, science, and the arts. While it is true that some educators may prioritize teaching according to the test, this is not a flaw inherent in standardized testing but rather a failure of teaching practices. The use of standardized testing does not inherently prevent teachers from providing a well-rounded education that incorporates multiple subjects and fosters critical thinking and creativity, but rather, it is up to teachers to create a balance between test preparation and other broader learning objectives. Moreover, standardized testing provides an objective measure of student achievement and can identify areas where students need additional support. The data provided by these tests can inform instructional decisions and help teachers target their instruction to address areas where students struggle. This targeted instruction can lead to improvements in academic performance and better prepare students for success in the …show more content…
People argue that standardized tests do not take into account the plethora of challenges that these students face, including language barriers, cultural differences, and limited access to resources. Although it is true that standardized tests may not be a flawless measure of student achievement and some students may encounter obstacles, these tests are designed to provide a fair and impartial measure of student performance. It can be thought of as a mirror, when being held up to a student “it faithfully reflects his or her knowledge and skills back to the test administrator.” Standardized tests are carefully crafted using rigorous research and are intended to be impartial to all students, irrespective of their background. Furthermore, standardized testing generates valuable data that can aid in identifying disparities in academic performance and shaping policies aimed at addressing these
True high-stakes standardized testing was begun in 2001, as part of the No Child Left Behind Act, which was put into place to help make it so that all children would have an equal opportunity to learn, regardless of their race, ethnic background or their families’ income level. While their goals sound admirable, the problem began with the implementation of the act; they wanted to ensure that each child was at least proficient in the standards that they developed, so they decided that testing was the best way to do so (Aske, Connelly & Corman, 2013). The issue with this is that not all students excel at test-taking, and putting so much emphasis on it can cause a student severe stress and anxiety (Colwell, 2013). In 2009, Race to the Top was implemented, but instead of placing less emphasis on testing and more on learning, it made the stakes worse, ensuring that schools that had students who did not perform as well could be shut down, or individual teachers could be fired if they did not show what was considered to be appropriate progress in test scores, which might soon prove impossible since the optimal goal is to reach a level of 100 percent of the students in a school to the proficiency level (Tavakolian & Howell,
Proponents see standardized testing as a way of making testing more efficient and effective by minimizing cost and increasing people’s accountability for their performance in the system. Opponents on the other hand argue that the systems has limitations based on its very nature on what can be tested and as a result of these standards needing to be met sacrifice some very important aspects of students education experience as well as force onto students and teachers a one size fits all model that has failed to deliver on its promises. After having reviewed all the evidence in detail it becomes clear to me that standardized testing is not an effective system for educating students and does more bad than good
In fact, the increasing use of standardized testing will do more damage than good, because of its failure to capture the entirety of a student’s body of work. Furthermore, the overwhelming stress that the United States government, and school systems have placed on the usage of standardized tests has become detrimental to American education, and is not the most effective way to gauge the intelligence of American students. The American educational system should be fixated on providing each child enough attention and information so they can succeed in that class and in the future. However, the increasing focus on having to pass a standardized test has blinded schools of the real goal, because they are required to get their students to pass the standardized tests.
These limitations highlight the need for an alternative form of assessment that can capture a more diverse set of student learning outcomes. As such, the narrow focus of standardized testing may lead to an ineffective evaluation approach, which undermines the goal of education or prepares students for success in various contexts. While standardized tests offer a perspective of student performance in a limited number of areas, they should not be relied upon as the core measure of student
In “What are the Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing,” Spark Admissions argues two outlooks on standardized testing. Standardized testing is any mandatory test that everybody in an area has to take, and they all have to do them under certain conditions. Some examples are SC Ready, MAP, SC PASS and the ACT. Students take these tests to measure their knowledge on a topic and compare them with other students. Standardized testing should not be required in schools because it can cause students to lose confidence in themselves, students with more wealth are the ones more likely to succeed, and the tests are unfair to some students with special needs.
The average American student takes about 112 standardized tests between pre-kindergarten and 12th grade (Strauss). A standardized test is any form of test that requires the student to answer the same selection of common questions in a consistent matter, which makes it possible to compare relative student performance. Standardized tests restrict creativity, waste time, and waste money. We should get rid of standardized tests in our school system. Standardized tests limit a student’s ability to express creativity.
All students dread one thing when it comes to school - testing. Standardized test are the main focus in our school systems instead of actually gaining knowledge at the end of the year. As a mother, Michelle Rhee, understands the lack of attention given on education as a whole instead of just waiting on the scores, but she still agrees on continuing with standardized test. Kristina Rizga opposes the opinion of Michelle Rhee as she does not believe standardized test truly measure the intelligence of a student. Kristina Rizga proves her stand against standardized test by utilizing solid use of argumentation.
The education system in the United States of America is frequently questioned, as well as the systems that have been put in place to try and repair it. The schools in the U.S. have learned to depend on standardized testing too much to the point that it is harmful to the students. Today teachers encourage students to be themselves and become their best self and make them conform to national standards all in one breath. Some of the main problems with standardized testing are: the reforms don’t work for the people that need it most, and the nation relies too much on test scores.
Standardized testing has become one of the most popular types of testing in U.S. public schools to date. Students take numerous standardized tests throughout their childhood schooling. (Studies show that a typical student takes an average of 112 mandated standardized tests between Pre-K and 12th grade.) While standardized testing is one of the main procedures that Universities use to judge incoming students, it is not proven to be the most effective way to convey a student’s actual intelligence level. The U.S. should not focus so heavily on standardized testing because it is not a complete accurate measurement of a student’s intelligence.
Standardized tests cause stress and failure among students. Standardized tests should be banned in the U.S. because of the stress and weight it adds to a student's grades and education after high school. Tests separate groups of kids based on their capability giving them the illusion that they aren't as smart as their friends, taking a toll on their mental health and stability from a young age. Standardized testing does not provide an accurate representation of what a student has learned and provides unnecessary stress throughout the school career. Standardized tests negatively affect public schools is the claim of Standardized Testing Has Negatively Impacted Public Schools``By Bobbie A. Solley.
Standardized tests are becoming less of the norm for students as colleges recognize that they could be a poor resource for college admissions. They have been around since 1875 and should be altered to conform to today's society. Students' futures should not revolve around these exams. Although standardized tests improve equity when applying for college, these exams should not be the center of the school's curriculum because schools are unable to prepare teachers, leaving the students with unnecessary stress and poor achievement.
Spark Admissions explains the advantages and disabilities of standardized tests. Schools should continue to use standardized testing because it gives inclusive opportunities, it gets students ready for future testing, and shows progress. Schools should continue to use standardized testing because it gives inclusive support. “Standardized tests can give students from under-performing high schools a chance to prove that they have mastered ample academic material despite their circumstances” (8). Standardized testing gives kids a chance to show how talented they are in that subject without their
In the article,”Why Standardized Tests Don’t Measure Education Quality” published by Educational Leadership, the authors explain,”Such information, because it illuminates a child’s strengths and weaknesses, can be helpful not only in dealing with their child’s teacher but also in determining at home assistance”(Popham 1). Not everything can be taught in the classroom and sometimes kids need to find extra help outside of school. These standardized tests have always been an efficient way to show where these problem areas are so that students can focus on areas where they need more attention. Continuing to use these standardized tests heavily impact the learning of American students. By looking at the data from standardized tests in American schools, they can show what extra work needs to be done in order to improve students’
The Downfall of Standardized Testing Adccording to a recent report, “42% of ACT-tested graduates in the class of 2022 met none of the subject benchmarks in English, reading, science, and math, which are indicators of how well students are expected to perform in corresponding college courses” (“ACT Test Scores” par. 3). In 2022, “ACT scores were at an average of 19.8, which were the lowest they had been in 30 years” (“ACT Test Scores” par. 1). The school system has failed students by allowing teachers to “teach the test” rather than teach students how to understand and comprehend the material. Therefore, standardized tests are an unfair way to measure a student’s academic performance because of outside factors, the impacts of high-stakes testing,
Students are often taught to memorize facts and formulas rather than to think creatively and critically about the world around them. The focus on testing results in a one-size-fits-all approach to education that neglects the individual needs and interests of students. Furthermore, the use of standardized testing can exacerbate existing inequities in education. Students from disadvantaged backgrounds often struggle with standardized tests due to factors such as lack of access to resources and testing anxiety.