Main Argument: P1: The costs of health care would decrease if we have universal health care. P2: Universal healthcare needs to be available for everyone just like education is. P3: Having healthcare would allow individuals to get the health care that they so deserve. C: Therefore, universal healthcare should be made available for every person regardless if they can afford it or not. Counterargument: P1: Universal healthcare would cause our taxes to go up. P2: Universal healthcare will cause doctor’s wages to decrease. P3: People may abuse universal healthcare and cause the overuse of health care resources. C: Therefore, universal healthcare needs not to be available for every individual. The first premise is the biggest argument against universal health care. It is going to cause an increase in our taxes. …show more content…
The positive side states it will be more affordable but the other side states that universal healthcare will cost more. How does universal healthcare make it so affordable? Individuals will not have huge medical bills. They will never have to worry about any bills coming in the mail at all. How will universal healthcare happen? It is very simple. Taxes will increase more than what they already are just so all individuals can have health care (Emanuel & Fuchs, 2005 and Healy, 2009). Best Objection: The major objection to this is also the primary point which is costs. It will unavoidably cost people so much more than now. At this stage in time, folks pay the health care facilities, but once the universal healthcare goes full force, the government will take over. A good example where they are already doing this is the VA hospitals. Veterans do not get the care that they are supposed to get. If veterans do not get the care that they are meant to get then how will anyone else be able to? (Emanuel and Fuchs, 2005). References Emanuel, E. & Fuchs, V. (2005). Solved! Washington Monthly, Vol. 37 Issue 6, p20-24.
The Affordable Health Care Act, also known as “Obamacare”, is basically just Obama trying to make sure that the whole nation has insurance and if they do not have it by January 1, 2014, they will be penalized with a fine. To make insurance more affordable, many Americans are able to qualify for a subsidy that lowers the cost depending on age and income. Also, “Obamacare” made it impossible for insurers’ to discriminate, or charge higher rates, for anyone who has pre-existing conditions or for a certain gender. Medicare will also be easier to obtain due to requirement of insurance. This law was passed in the U.S. on March 23, 2010 by Congress and President Barack Obama.
In America, universal healthcare would undermine principles important to the functioning of society; specifically, it would undermine individual liberty, free enterprise and free
Health care for everyone is able to give people time out of the financial debt if they have no insurance. When you have no insurance you have to pay out of pocket for all doctor visits and also you might be rejected medical help. So when there is everyone on one page with health care you are able to have your finances in tack a little more also if it becomes more inexpensive for the people. Don 't you think that your body is worth the try?The government makes millions dollars of the medical industry weather prescription drugs,insurance companies,and doctor visits. When everyone is the same that means the government would have to set one set prices for everyone to be able to survive financially in it and not everyone is able to go into
Lastly, in a universal health care system we already have the options stated by the speaker available for consumers. Canadian citizens are able to go to clinics to get medical
First, there would be a decreased amount of health care costs that would be absorbed, and second, social programs would have more money in their budget to use
Why deny people care for their health? Overall the universal healthcare system would benefit the citizens of the United
The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.
Single Payer health care is also much cheaper overall than the currently implemented or any previously implemented system in the United States. The inefficiencies and deprivation of human due to for-profit health care systems must come to an end, and a single payer system must be signed into law because many people have had and will have their lives abused and ruined by the current
Health care is essential for Americans despite pre-existing conditions, and a free market insurance program would allow citizens to received the health care that is so desperately needed. A universal health care system is a matter of human rights and would solve America’s problem of one sixth of the population being
Obama Care also known as the Affordable Care Act signed in by president Barack Obama in 2010, This was to insure that all the Americans will have free access to medical care if they got sick and it would will help reduce the growth of healthcost spending in the country, hence in economic and stability growth among the citizens of America. Right now in the USA the ObamaCare law is a permanent part of the landscape, The USA republicans said that, despite the high court decision upholding various subsidies, the law itself remains the largest and dangerous threat to health care. Although it has its own benefits, Obamacare is increasing costs for hardworking families. Republicans argue that many people have to pay higher costs or see their former policies canceled. Which is leading to poor economy and increasing of debts and deaths within the country.
Analysis of Healthcare to Thesis Healthcare is important to our well being, which is why we have free health care. That also means that Canadians have the burden of paying higher taxes in order to have free health care. Argument #4: The Aging
We should care for everyone who lives in our country even if we don’t know each other. None one should ever be left behind to suffer or see other people suffer from something that can be easily cured. Healthcare would save tons of lives, keep our nation whole, and make everyone strong again. Universal healthcare for everyone would save the lives of children whose parents can’t afford to pay for their insurance.
Now, I know there are already plans out there on how to make this a reality, I just need those plans on my desk and a reasonable timeline to institute those changes. So come on my fellow revolutionaries who have shouted the rallying cry of Universal Healthcare for All, step up and help me change healthcare in our country. Please have your plan on my desk at 6 pm the Monday following my swearing in, cuz I know you've got it written out somewhere, right now, just waiting to be read. Now that I've given that order, I'm sure at least a dozen of those will show up on my desk next Monday.
In the presence of a free health service helps to boost the economy nation which is a lots of people will raise the standard of living by increase the economic productivity. People will contribute in the economy sector very well if they are healthy. From the source that I get, according to House research Department Universal Health Coverage an Economist Perspective 2007 the author says, health care costs may prevent some individuals from working or seeking higher earnings. Working harder to increase earnings may result in losing their subsidized coverage or having to pay more in premiums. So, the free healthcare for everyone will raise the standard which is can lead more to economic
When considering the choice if basic health care should be free for everyone, the choice should definitely be yes. Basic health care should be free for everyone because it will save the lives of people who wouldn 't ordinarily live, it has been shown by two sources that it will help slow the growth of health costs, and providing free health care will also lead to providing insurance for people who don 't have insurance yet. If basic health care does not become free for everyone, our population will drop. The only people left in the world will be the people who are rich and have enough money to have free health care. Basic health care should be free for everyone because it 's the right thing to do and we’re helping each other