There were three main architectural styles in ancient Greece, they were the Doric, Ionic, and the Corinthian. We will examine the style and function of these two well known buildings, those being the Parthenon in Athens and the Parthenon in Rome. We will consider the similarities and differences of the culture and how that shows throughout the buildings architectural design The Parthenon of Athens was built under the watchful eye of statesman Perikles, in the year 447 BC.The ancient Greeks will very good craftsmen when designing these temples even back in their day. Many methods and formulas developed by the Greeks can still be seen in today 's architecture. The Parthenon in Athens is a remarkable site to see as the skeleton of the building still stands to this day. When building these temples the idea …show more content…
The Pantheon in Rome is a very unique building, that even after 2,000 years it is still being used in today 's world. That alone speaks volumes of how well the building was first built, but also the care and maintenance that keeps the Pantheon standing. The Pantheon was built as a Roman Temple, under the ruler of Augustus. Now, used as a church in Rome dedicated to St. Mary, but when first built it is thought to be dedicated to all gods. This Parthenon is very much different from the Parthenon of Athens. The style of this one in Rome falls under the Corinthian architecture columns. Corinthian style was the last of the three styles to be developed. Doric was first and Ionic be after that and before Corinthian. Corinthian style is best known for the unique and very detailed style throughout the column, and capitals. Capital is the top part of the column, which was usually decorated with acanthus leaves, but also had many other options of designs. It also didn’t have columns running around the whole structure. This Pantheon had eight columns in
The Parthenon building consists of the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian columns. These orders are distinguished by their capitals at the top of the column. They are either short and thick, as in the case of the Doric column or tall and slimmer, as in the case of the Iconic columns, the dimensions of either of which is indicative of strength and or power. According to Ricard (2010), “Doric is not only a type of column, but an "order"; this means that temples of the Doric order not only have this type of column, but also have a certain structure at the upper levels”.
Of all the architectural designs utilized by the ancient Greeks throughout history, three major Greek styles have withstood
Between Athens and Rome, I believe Rome had the better system of citizenship. Two different citizenship systems- Athenian and Roman- was the better system? First off, Athenians were extremely tight with their citizenship requirements.
When the Americans built the Capitol in 1791 they wanted to compliment the Romans work and by bringing it into the United States. Roman architecture is very distinctive looking. In almost every famous Roman building their are at least a couple columns, columns are detached or attached from the building in all Roman architecture. Ionic columns are the ones on the Capitol building and on the Colosseum are Roman Tuscan columns. If you compare the Colosseum that was build in 70 AD to the Capitol Building that was build in 1791, there is little to no difference in the style, size or structure in the building that were build thousands of years apart.
Accordingly, each time was influenced by historical events that made them distinctive. With regard to Greek architecture, it is characterized by the logical approach. Furthermore, construction became a representation of the Greek values and views. The human’s experience was a center of events. As a result, the buildings represented the particular attention to human and divinity.
The Greeks were known for their love of symmetry and balance in their buildings. Most of their structures contained columns and pediments. The column, capital, and entablature are examples of Greek architectural traits that have evolved into essential elements of Western architecture. For example, the Corinthian, Doric, and Ionic columns were frequently used in the construction of governmental structures, temples, and monuments in Western architecture. Buildings gained a sense of grandeur and permanence thanks to the usage of these columns, which also served as emblems of power and stability.
Athens had better cultural achievements. “The myths continued to be popular through the centuries, and major public buildings such as the Parthenon at Athens, the Temple of Zeus at Olympia, and the Temple to Apollo at Delphi were decorated with larger-than-life sculpture representing celebrated scenes from mythology.” (Greek mythology) The architecture of Athens often revolved around pleasing the gods, and because of the fact Parthenon is still standing today, it is still a major architectural influence for modern government buildings. “All citizens in Athens could participate directly in the government.
During the classical period from 500 to 300 B.C., the ancient Greeks experienced an age of long-lasting cultural developments. The developed in the areas of democracy, literature, but most importantly in art because art embodies that Greeks ideas and theories to be perfectionists. The Greeks created long-lasting developments in the areas of art during the golden age. According to document 2, Greek architects created one of the finest and most advanced buildings in the entire Ancient world. Not only did the Greeks create appealing buildings, but they would concern the areas of proportion and accessibility.
If I was selected as the Curator for a special project, and had to choose an artwork to carry aboard a space to to preserve I would choose the Parthenon, a temple in Athens, Greece which was impressively built over a period of more than ten years, from 448 and 432 BCE (“The Humanistic Tradition” 122). The temple known as the Parthenon was dedicated to Athena, who was the goddess of war. (“The Humanistic Tradition” 122) According to Silverman, “The Parthenon consists of a rectangular floor plan with a series of low steps on every side, and a colonnade (8 x 17) of Doric columns extending around the periphery of the entire structure, each entrance has an additional six columns in front of it.” Silverman also states that the larger of the two interior rooms, the naos, housed the cult statue, and the smaller room, known as the opisthodomos, was used as a treasury.
The Pantheon was first built with a rectangular plan but when Hadrian came in 125AD and rebuilt it, he added a dome. Currently, the Pantheon is used as both a church and also a historical heritage site. On the other hand, the Brunelleschi 's Dome is part of the Basilica di Santa Maria del Fiore, and it is one of the biggest churches in Florence which is in Italy (Mainstone, 1997). The construction of the church began in 1296
If you have never had the opportunity to see the Parthenon in Greece and the Pantheon in Italy, it’s possible that the similarity of the names would lead you to believe that they are the same or, at least, almost identical. While it is true that certain elements of the buildings mirror each other, there are major differences in their structures and functions. The architecture of each reflects the cultural ideals of the times. After the Greeks overcame the Persian invasion, Athens became the head of all of the Greek city-states. During this period, the country enjoyed peace and great prosperity.
Similarly, the Parthenon and Pantheon were high rising buildings which are typical of a classical
From 300 BCE onwards, the Greek peripteral temple lost much of its importance: during the third century the Asia Minor temple came to end, also in mainland Greece and in the nearby Greek colonies. Even monumental projects like Artemisia and the temple of Apollo had made little progress. All this had changed during the second century, when the temple building had come across some resurgence due partly to increase prosperity, a portion of improvements went to architect Hermogenes of Priene to the Ionic style of architecture, and between the various Hellenistic kingdoms and Rome partly went to the cultural propaganda war waged. So during this process and massive amount of Greek temples had been built in southern Asia Minor, Egypt and North Africa. As far as styles went the Doric style had fallen completely out of fashion.
Examining the Parthenon in Athens and comparing it to the Pantheon in Rome is a great lesson in classical Greek architecture. The Greeks have influenced society’s around the world with their amazing building abilities and classic style. The Romans were heavily influenced by the Greeks greatness, but they did not just merely copy and plagiarize they expanded upon it and created their own schools of thought art and architecture, again thanks to the Greeks. The Parthenon in Athens is a magnificent Doric temple built at the height of the Athenian empire.
The Forum of Trajan is a Roman example of axial planning because as you entered through its triumphal arch towards a statue of Trajan in the center, the surrounding structures were at opposite angles and lines, creating a clear sense of order and focus. [12] The complexity of this planning demonstrates the outlook and organization that went into any of the architecture in Rome and Athens. [13] While many citizens at the time did not appreciate (or may have not noticed) this visual architectural connection between Rome and Athens, the members of the elite who traveled, did especially the Roman Emperor Augustus. The cities of Rome and Athens became increasingly similar during the Augustan period and created a hybrid style that was influenced by Augustus. Though the exchange in architectural culture between these two cities was common there were subtle difference.