What are Books? Books are the keys to the future and meant to give its readers a moral lesson. Often times we forget about what the book is saying and only look at how it is said. For this reason many generations are are left out on the knowledge and moral lessons that the books give. They are left out because the books that obtain the knowledge and moral lessons are banned from high school libraries. They are banned to shield the teenage eye from content of the books. The sad part is that high school students have no say in the the process of banning books.
Books are banned in high school to protect the teenage eye. To shield high schoolers from the painted picture of reality. Reality, the state of having existence. Reality is the truth behind
…show more content…
First, there has to be an expostulation to a specific book. The expostulation has to be very specific as to what the reader found offensive.Second, the expostulation will be filed and reviewed by a committee. In america the American Library Association(ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom(OIF) will review the expostulation given from the reader.Finally, after the expostulation is reviewed there will be a verdict which states rather the book will be either banned or removed from the library. If the people don’t agree with the verdict that was given from the OIF they will keep attempting to remove the book. There have been over 17,700 attempts to remove books from libraries since 1990 but few books have been banned . In 2014 only 311 books were banned, that is less than 48% of the books that should have been each year, statistically speaking.The book banning process is important to shielding high schoolers for one reason... the ALA’s OIF.The ALA’s OIF has certain requirements that high school student cannot meet to join the organization. So therefore high school students have little say in stopping books from being banned. As Harlan Ellison said “ You are not entitled to your own opinion you are entitled to your informed opinion”.Which means that every living thing on earth not only is entitled to their own opinion but they …show more content…
Although many students may not agree with the banning of books some students do think that some high school books don’t belong in a high school library. Shequoya Jones said “ I don’t think that all books belong in school libraries because some of the books have explicit language and material that some readers are not ready for. Also, you can attain the same books in the public library if you really want them”. This demonstrates students are not always prepared for the content inside the books, even when reading the back of the book. Andre Jones said “Even when reading the back of the book it doesn’t give me the specifics of the explicitness of book”. Gloria Smith is a strong believer of “everything is done for a reason” she also argued that the language is very
Censoring Books In Public Schools Is Necessary To Protect The Children Books have been censored for decades, mostly for secular and religious reasons. With the invention of the printing press in 1450, it became harder to eliminate offensive books, however a study conducted at the American Library Association (ALA), says that most books have been challenged by parents followed by patrons, a board or administration, librarians or teachers, political and religious groups, and the government. The same study showed that “sexually explicit content, offensive language, and "unsuited to any age group" are the top three reasons cited for requesting a book to be removed” (“Banned Books”). Books in public schools should continue to be censored for the protection of children and the improvement of society.
On the issue of banning books, it seems that the parents know the right things and others do not. In reality every book read in a high school, a parent is always going to state why the child should not read such and such a book. It 's simply opinionated. I believe that if a book has some good moral or is taught in a manner that projects good morality then it should be allowed to be part of the school 's
Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.
At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.
Banning books hinders younger generations learning abilities massively. Most people are different in the ways they work and the things they want their child seeing. The only problem with this is that this starts controversy and unnecessary drama around younger audiences. And many audiences of older people do not like things found in books so they challenge in communities to get them banned.
First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
Intro 1: What if your young child is looking through a book at your public library and comes across a topic that was way too mature for their mind set. Would you be okay with it? A big controversial issue that has been going on in the past year is if books should be banned. Now, no one is trying to banish libraries across the globe but people have requested to ban books that are inappropriate. This matter has grown to be worse because everyone has an opinion.
Certain people believe specific books should not be banned in schools or libraries because it interferes with certain people’s freedom. Banning books interferes with the authors freedom rights. Our First Amendment Right states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (“Your Bill of Rights”).
“over 1500 books are challenged becuase of “explisit” sexcual content..” (“Banned and challenged books by the numbers”).(12 infographics about banned and challenged books). Books are one of the best sources for information Kids are missing out on the great quality of books that have/will be banned. “Parents who don 't like specific books can have their kids "opt out" of an assignment without infringing on the rights of others. The National Coalition against Censorship explained that "Even books or materials that many find 'objectionable ' may have educational value, and the decision about what to use in the classroom should be based on professional judgments and standards, not individual preferences." [6] In the 1982 Supreme Court ruling on Board of Education v. Pico, Justice Brennan wrote that taking books off of library shelves could violate students ' First Amendment rights, adding that "Local school boards may not remove books from school libraries simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books."
Attempting to destroy the history that has already occurred is a threatening maneuver to society’s growth. And no matter the case, banning and censorship of books is against the first amendment granted to the American people. And this does not mean anyone should be forced to read something if they do not choose to. The freedom to choose is still there for all, at least in America. If a parent doesn’t want their child reading something they can choose not to allow them to read it themselves.
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
Which is what all schools are supposed to teach. Justice Brendon, part of the supreme court, wrote in 1982 that "Taking books off of library shelves could violate students' First Amendment rights," adding that "Local school boards may not remove books from school libraries simply because they don't like the ideas contained in those books" Although, Parents were the ones to inforce the ban onto the schools. Although, Parents have a right to what their child reads doesn't mean that they get to decide what the entire school can or can't read. It does make sense because the child will still be surrounded by other students who are reading the ‘vulgar' material. But banning the books from schools and public libraries doesn't mean that the book won't dissipate forever.
Parents should have the right to ban books from school libraries because some books could contain offensive material and could stand as a threat to human equality. For example, as society enters a new era of making learning more inclusive, Some books contain material that is offensive to culture, gender and race. Parents should have the right to correct what schools are teaching their kids, and to limit extremism and hatred within the school communities. Equally important, teachers should also understand this issue as a threat to human equality and should stand with parents, not against them. This example illustrates that books that contain biased information,
Though the books that have been banned in the past have controversial issues, they include real situations and problems that can happen in the real world. Books may be banned for going against religious beliefs, but not all people are religious. Novels could also be banned for not being appropriate for a certain age group, but they still include real situations that can happen in the real world, and students need to be educated about them. Therefore, if no books are ever banned or challenged, students would not be restricted from learning about what they will encounter in